Решения о применении временных мер Европейского суда по правам человека с целью предотвращения высылки и экстрадиции: проблемы исполнения и оценка эффективности

Ius Publicum et Privatum. 2018. № 1(1). С. 21–23.

Глазова А. П.

The article examines the problem of non-enforcement of the decisions of the European Court
of Human Rights in cases on the prevention of expulsion or extradition. The transformation of
the institution of interim measures after its adoption by international law from national legal
systems is analyzed, particular attention is paid to the British legal tradition. Legal positions
of states are considered when deciding whether or not to comply with the requirements of the
European Court of Human Rights on the application of interim measures to prevent the
expulsion or extradition at the national level by the example of such judgments as «Trabelsi
v. Belgium» and «Savriddin Juraev v. Russia». The author comes to the conclusion that
violations of the ECHR decisions on the application of interim measures often occur not
because of the impossibility of the execution of the decision by the state, but because of
the imperfection of the legal procedures at the national level or the unwillingness of the
states to implement these decisions. It is emphasized the need to find a balance in which
interim measures are simultaneously acceptable to states and will protect the interests
of the applicants.

Keywords: права человека, Европейский Суд по правам человека, human rights, European Court of Human Rights, временные меры, extradition, экстрадиция, interim measures