?
Порядок разрешения вопросов о возмещении убытков, причиненных незаконными действиями государственных органов и должностными лицами
The article concerns interesting and important issues of compensation for harm caused by illegal actions of administrative bodies. The article focuses on the current aspect of the issue. The paper proposes necessary amendments to the legislation related to the issues raised in the article. In particular, the paper proposes amendments to the legislation, for example the supplement of Art. 2 in the Law of the Russian Federation from 27.04.1993 N 4866-1 On appealing against the actions and decisions violating the rights and freedoms of citizens’ may be supplied with the provision that citizens have the right to file application for damages or losses caused by illegal actions of administrative bodies in the event of denial letter regarding the implementation of pre-court dispute resolution by an official. The author also proposed to supply Art. 6 of the Law of the Russian Federation from 27.04.1993 N 4866-1 On appealing against the actions and decisions violating the rights and freedoms of citizens with the provision under which in cases established by law, when considering a complaint for damages (harm)caused by unlawful actions (inaction) of an official, court must take into account the obligation to complywith the order of pre-trial dispute resolution procedure for damages (harm) to a maximum of 100,000 roubles. Russian law 27.04.1993 N 4866-1 On appealing against the actions and decisions violating the rights and freedoms of citizens may include a rule under which unlawful conduct of an official who would not pay damages shall responsible. The author shows the necessity of the changes in the Arbitrazh and Civil procedural Codes of the Russian Federation, the Russian Code of Civil Procedure concerning the cases when an appropriate subject doe s not voluntarily pay the damages caused by unlawful actions (inaction) of officials, the amount to be raised through the courts, can be increased. The author concluded that legislation should encourage compensation in administrative procedure, as opposed to large financial costs in the courts.