Взаимодействие региональных и местных органов власти в управлении пространственным развитием

Высоковский Александр Аркадьевич

Publications

Book chapter

Взаимодействие региональных и местных органов власти в управлении пространственным развитием

С. 338-347.

Высоковский А. А.

Language: Russian

Full text (DOC, 129 Kb)

Keywords: управление развитием пространственное развитие региональная власть местная власть

In book

VIII Международная научная конференция. Модернизация экономики и общественное развитие: В 3 кн.

Edited by: Е. Г. Ясин Кн. 3. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2007.

О развитии государственно-частного партнерства в российских регионах

Воротников А. М., Королев В. А. Недвижимость и инвестиции. Правовое регулирование. 2010. № 2(43). С. 49-57.

The willingness of the regional authority and business to partnership in the investing activities on the public property objects, as well as the level and the main difficulties of the infrastructure market development, based on the principles of public-private partnership, are being investigated in the article

Added: Oct 22, 2012

Муниципальная политика и местное самоуправление в России

Горный М. Б. Ч. 1: Муниципальная политика. СПб.: ЮТАС, 2010.

Added: Feb 7, 2013

Оценка результативности и намеренное искажение данных на региональном и муниципальном уровнях власти

Kalgin A., Eliseenko V. Государственное и муниципальное управление. WP8. Высшая школа экономики, 2015. No. WP8/2015/05.

The problem of credibility of performance information is understudied in the public administration literature. Only a few scholarly articles examine the issue of (dis)honest performance reporting. Despite the widespread acceptance of the importance of public sector transparency and accountability, little attention has been devoted to examining the factors that promote or undermine honest performance reporting in government agencies. This article presents the results of a survey of 177 Russian municipalities who were asked to rate the credibility of 35 performance indicators used by regional government to evaluate performance of local authorities. The survey demonstrates that some indicators are trusted significantly less than others. The following statistical analysis shows that least trusted indicators exhibit a pecu-liar dynamics that Kalgin (2014) describes as “prudent data manipulation”. Theoretical explanations of this are presented based on different theories of bureaucracy. The article was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2014–2015 (grant № 14-05-0009) and supported within the framework of a subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.

Added: Mar 19, 2016

Российская корпорация и региональные власти: модели взаимоотношений и их эволюция

Yakovlev A. A. WP BRP 55/LNG/2017. Высшая школа экономики, 2007. No. 14.

Relations between enterprises and authorities in Russian regions have attracted the attention of many researchers since the mid-1990s. At present, the issues raised by these relations are just as urgent as before because of two current trends. On one hand, growing pressure from the global market is an objective reason for the business community in Russia to seek government support. However, after the Yukos affair Russian business in general found itself subjugated to the federal authorities. For this reason, Russian companies may be expected to more closely cooperate with regional and local administration in pursuit of more favorable conditions for business. On the other hand, the Russian fiscal system was reformed and authority between the federal center and the Russian regions were redistributed so that the budgets of regional governments were reduced and their liabilities remained almost unchanged. Thus, regional authorities may in turn have incentives to change their policy posture towards the business community. In this paper we will use the results of a new empirical study of Russian joint stock companies to assess the extent to which these two trends affected the real mechanisms of interaction between businesses and the state on the regional level.

Added: Mar 14, 2013

Заключение

Лимонов Л. Э. В кн.: Пространственное развитие Санкт-Петербургской агломерации: особенности, проблемы, факторы. СПб.: Международный центр социально-экономических исследований «Леонтьевский центр», 2012. С. 187-193.

Added: Feb 14, 2013

Оценка готовности региональных органов власти привлекать независимых поставщиков социальных услуг

Ефремов С. В. Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2013. № 1. С. 91-109.

Added: Apr 3, 2013

Инновационный менеджмент

Тебекин А. В. М.: Юрайт, 2013.

Added: Feb 21, 2013

Предисловие

Added: Feb 14, 2013

Пространственное развитие Санкт-Петербургской агломерации: особенности, проблемы, факторы

Власова Т. В., Лимонов Л. Э. СПб.: Международный центр социально-экономических исследований «Леонтьевский центр», 2012.

Added: Feb 14, 2013

SPATIAL DIMENSION OF KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES IN RUSSIA

Kotomina O. V. Science, Technology and Innovation. WP BRP. Высшая школа экономики, 2015

This paper is focused on the spatial aspects of the knowledge intensive business services sector in Russia. The study is based on a unique empirical data from mass surveys of Russian producers and consumers of KIBS. Comparative analysis of the incoming and outgoing flows of KIBS in Russian regions helps us to classify federal districts by their involvement in KIBS exchange, and to map the intensity of these flows. We have identified regions that are actively involved in both the purchase of services and their delivery outside the regional boundaries (Volga and Central Districts); active regions of consumption with an average level of production (Northwestern and Siberian Districts); and the passive regions, who are only weakly involved in inter-regional exchange of knowledge intensive business services (Ural and Southern Federal Districts).

Added: Nov 23, 2015

Собственность на землю и регулирование застройки как факторы пространственного развития территории ( на примере Санкт-Петербурга)

Лимонов Л. Э. В кн.: Инновационная экономика: реалии и перспективы: научная конференция, Санкт-Петербург, 27 сентября 2011 года. СПб.: Отдел оперативной полиграфии НИУ ВШЭ – Санкт-Петербург, 2012. С. 95-99.

In Soviet period absence of market prices led to extremely inefficient land use and spatial development of cities. Centralized planning system was not flexible and responsive to changing demand, preoccupied with minimization of construction costs and characterized by very low density of land use. In 20 years after the beginning of market economic reforms and mass privatization of real property the situation in land use and spatial development of Russian cities didn’t change much. Main reasons of this are: unclear, non-specified and often not registered property rights; quasi-monopoly of the state on urban lands; absence of clear distinction between federal, regional and municipal lands; high transaction costs and administrative barriers for developers; still very much administrative approach to planning and land use regulation, absence of real dialog with community development groups and NGOs. In this legal and institutional environment regional and/or local authorities often act in interests of big and influential investors and developers, scarifying interests of community as well as of small private owners and tenants. As a result we can see a further worsening of the urban environment, decreasing of green areas, disappearance of historical character of whole parts of city centers, sprawl developments in suburbia etc.

To measure transaction costs and administrative risks in urban development and construction, a survey of developers, builders and real estate agents was undertaken in St Petersburg and Leningrad region, the results of which are presented in the paper.

Added: Feb 14, 2013

Рефлексивная диагностика в управлении развитием организации (на примере семинара-тренинга по стратегии развития компании)

Степанов С. Ю., Кремер Е. Акмеология. 2011. № 1. С. 77-91.

The article describes theoretical and practical grounds for the methods of reflexive diagnostics and practical approaches to their use in organizational consulting activity. The authors, representing reflexive acmeology school, provide an original methodology of psycho diagnostics use in the management of company and its leaders development.

Added: Dec 14, 2012