Book chapter
Международно-правовая ответственность государств за международно-противоправные деяния
С. 417-436.
Ганюшкина Е. Б.
In book
Ч. 3: Правовое обеспечение пограничной деятельности. М.: Пограничная академия ФСБ России, 2010.
Similar publications
Барандова Т. Л. СПб.: НОРМА, 2010.
Added: Mar 19, 2013
Ганюшкина Е. Б. Международное право и международные организации. 2012. № 1. С. 10-33.
Added: Jun 30, 2012
Ivanov E. A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 40/LAW/2014.
The Order of Malta became a subject of international law with the emergence of classical international law in the 16th century and the concept of international legal personality and since that period has always been recognised as such. However, the form of its existence has undergone a number of transformations. Today, the Order of Malta constitutes a unique subject and the nature of its international legal personality represents a great scientific and practical interest. The author is of the opinion that both theories of recognition which exist in the doctrine of international law, i.e. the declarative and constitutive theories, apply to the status of the Order of Malta. This paper analyses the nature of international legal personality and the mission of the Order of Malta as a subject of international law in the 21st century. Special attention is paid to the Constitution, the Government and the judicial system of the Order of Malta, as well as cooperation between the Order and the Russian Federation.
Added: Oct 2, 2014
Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2009.
Added: Jul 23, 2012
Панченко П. Н. В кн.: Современное российское уголовное законодательство: состояние, тенденции и перспективы развития с учетом требования динамизма, преемственности и повышения экономической эффективности (к 15-летию принятия Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации 1996 года). Материалы всероссийской научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 4 октября 2011 года). Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2012. С. 258-269.
Added: Oct 9, 2012
Бикметова Т. И., Королев Г. В кн.: Коммуникативистика: прикладные аспекты социально-гуманитарного знания: Материалы IV Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, 14 марта 2008. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2008. С. 14-18.
Added: Dec 5, 2012
Мулюн В. Н. В кн.: Модернизация экономики и глобализация: В 3 кн. Кн. 3.. Кн. 3. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2009. С. 674-683.
Added: Aug 20, 2013
Юмашев Ю. М. Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2009. № 2. С. 3-9.
Added: Oct 15, 2012
Лютов Н. Л. трудовое право; право социального обеспечения. 12.00.05. МГЮА им. О.Е. Кутафина, 2013
Added: May 15, 2014
Rusinova V., Pereverzeva A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2020. No. 97.
This paper revisits the traditional trade-off between privacy and security, which underpins the compatibility of general and indiscriminate mass surveillance with international human rights instruments, and extends the orthodox patterns of legal argumentation using interdisciplinary knowledge, which is able to nurture, and to be translated into, the language of International Human Rights Law. In search of new resources and a second wind for the overburdened legal concept of privacy, this research combines a positivistic legal perspective with knowledge from sociologically framed surveillance studies, political theory, behavioral economics, and computer science, and deals with the threats and responses thereto from this epistemological standpoint.
The first of three threats singled out in the paper—the ‘securitization’ of the danger of terrorism—is treated through embedding the effectiveness of predictive algorithms to the proportionality test. A consensus of ‘Big Brothers’ to use mass surveillance tools as the second threat is considered using constitutional theory and the bridge of the ‘democratic society’ component included in some international human rights instruments to transpose issues of fair representation to the standard of review. The third threat is the shift of social norms towards the permissibility of being watched. Resources to cope with this challenge can be found in the complementation of an individual reading of privacy as a right and a value by a collective one, which follows a primarily socio-economic trend to consider privacy as a public good.
Added: Dec 11, 2020