Book chapter
Конституционные основы института пересмотра судебных актов
Similar publications
Added: Jan 8, 2014
Medushevsky A. N. Political Science. PS. Высшая школа экономики, 2015. No. WP BRP 27/PS/2015 .
Transitional constitutionalism remains the subject of intensive political controversies. On the ground of the Project realized by the Institute of Law and Public Policy (Moscow) this article presents the analysis of the basic constitutional principles (pluralism, separation of powers, federalism, independence of justice, the guarantees of political rights and freedoms) describing the changing character of their implementation in different areas of constitutional practices – legislation, constitutional justice, administrative activity and informal practices and the comparative level of constitutional deviations in each of them. The important new acquirement of this research is the concept and methodology of the constitutional monitoring and recommendations for the full-scale reforms in key areas of Russian constitutional and political settlement. The author shows that the true choice of modern society is not the dilemma - constitutionalism versus its negation but the choice between real and sham constitutionalism with a big variety of intermediate options between them. It is precisely the area, which the author defines as a transitional type of constitutionalism, the field of collision of different political stakeholders. This is an area of unstable equilibrium where the implementation of different legal strategies and technologies may produce a definitive effect.
Added: Nov 13, 2015
Вып. 4. М.: ТЕИС, 2009.
Added: Mar 30, 2013
Karliuk M. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2015. No. WP BRP 53/LAW/2015.
The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is an emerging regional organization of economic integration in the post-Soviet space. Following the limited success of previous integration attempts, it seeks to pursue deeper integration, borrowing features from the EU.
The EAEU possesses a complex system of elements of an emerging legal order, some of which have distinct similarities with the EU, but others are decisively different. This paper analyses these features in order to find whether the legal changes that accompany the creation of the new entity allow ensuring the effective functioning of the EAEU and whether the respective legal order is autonomous similar to that of the EU.
The author argues that the EAEU lags behind the EU in terms of the autonomy of the legal order and in its ability to ensure the effective functioning of the organization. Supranational features are limited, while it relies predominantly on intergovernmental elements with a view to preserve the interests of all Member States.
Added: Sep 24, 2015
Морщакова Т. Г. В кн.: Пересмотр судебных актов в гражданском, арбитражном и уголовном судопроизводстве (аналитический обзор нормативно-правовых документов). М.: Юриспруденция, 2011. Гл. Раздел II.
Added: May 10, 2013
Заикин С. С. В кн.: Судьбы конституционализма в России и современном мире. Вып. 7. М.: Юрист, 2012. С. 93-119.
Added: Dec 3, 2012
Смирнов А. В. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы конституционного правосудия. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2011. С. 684-690.
Added: Mar 30, 2013
Любутов Н. А. Государство и право. 2010. № 8. С. 94-99.
Added: Oct 1, 2012