Адвокатская монополия в арбитражном процессе
The article reveals the issues of advocate’s activity in criminal procedure; considers the basic ethic problems — accept of assignment, alternative defense, conflicts defense. The article analyses the provisions of the Code of Professional Ethics, opinions of some researchers, provisions of legislation; the article also touches upon the issues of general ethics.
Adversary proceedings are impossible without precise observation of their regalement by all participants of judicial proceeding. The obligation to maintain order in judicial proceeding is laid upon the chairman. No abidance by the advocate to decisions and instructions of the chairman is a violation of requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RF.
The Constitution of the RF declares the right of free qualified assistance to everybody. Evidently the rendering of such assistance will cost a lot to society and state. The reader is presented with a set of three articles in which the author analyses the course of solution of the problem (Article 1. On History of Problem).