Book chapter
Правотворческие ошибки в контексте юридических коллизий уголовного судопроизводства России
С. 944-961.
We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
In the aspect of the Russian Federation preparation for the holding of the global sports competitions, not only practical questions become urgent, but also a theoretical analysis of the legal regulation of sports relations problems does. This article touches on the basic methodological approaches to the category «mechanism of legal regulation» in the context of relations arising in sports sphere.
The regulation of sport relations has sufficiently prolonged history; however, only from the middle of XX century state begins to take active part in this process. It is traditionally customary to assume that as the prevailing catalysts of this they served the need for providing safety with taking of sport measures, which sport association no longer could manage by its forces, and the entering into the sport of the large volume of the money investments, whose revolution needed control from the side of state. There are other points of view on this score.
Adversary proceedings are impossible without precise observation of their regalement by all participants of judicial proceeding. The obligation to maintain order in judicial proceeding is laid upon the chairman. No abidance by the advocate to decisions and instructions of the chairman is a violation of requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RF.