Book chapter
Место России в глобальных рейтингах конкурентоспособности
С. 74-80.
Ражева (Еделькина) А. А.
In book
Ч. 1. М.: Государственный университет Министерства финансов Российской Федерации, 2012.
Similar publications
Hainsworth R., Karminsky A. M., Solodkov V. M. Financial Economics. FE. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 01.
Investors are being encouraged after the global crisis to reduce their dependence on the largest credit rating agencies for risk assessments of companies and securities. Comparing risk assessments from different sources rapidly becomes non-trivial when more than three credit rating agencies are involved. We propose a method for comparing rating scales, and hence constructing correspondence diagrams and tables, thereby treating the rating scales used by different agencies as objects of study. Scales are compared by looking at sets of ratings assigned to similar entities (in this case banks) with the assumption that the risk being measured by each credit rating agency is the same for a given rated entity at a given point in time. Two ratings assigned by two credit rating agencies may differ for two reasons: the two agencies have different opinions about the relative positioning of the rated entity (e.g., issuer or security) with respect to the universe of other rated entities; both agencies position the rated entity with respect to the universe of other rated entities in the same way, but they use different symbols to represent this position. Type 1 differences should disappear when a large number of ratings are considered. The existence of type 2 differences will require a mapping from one rating scale to another. Studying international bank ratings for a five-year period shows that there are type 2 differences for the largest credit rating agencies. A mechanism for constructing mappings between scales could lead to more competition with new credit rating agencies.
Added: Aug 28, 2012
Россия в глобальном мире. Сборник научных трудов 10-й Всероссийской научно-теоретической конференции
СПб.: Издательство Политехнического университета, 2012.
Added: Feb 14, 2013
Титова Е. В. Вестник экономической интеграции. 2010. № 11 (31). С. 72-79.
Added: Apr 13, 2012
Попова М. В. В кн.: Теоретические и прикладные проблемы науки и образования в 21 веке. Сборник научных трудов по материалам Международной заочной научно-практической конференции 31 января 2012 г.: в 10 частях. Часть 5. Ч. 5. Тамбов: ТРОО «Бизнес-Наука-Общество», 2012. С. 112-114.
Added: Jul 17, 2012
Карминский А. М., Пересецкий А. А., Рыжов А. В. Управление финансовыми рисками. 2006. № 4. С. 362-373.
Added: Mar 6, 2013
Шадрин А. Е., Беляев А. Н. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2005. № 01.
In accord with discussions about the ways of rise competitiveness this paper analyses the experience of state assistance policy in the competitive ability of the other countries economy. The suggestions according its practical application under conditions of Russia
are also discussed in this paper.
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Макарова И. А. В кн.: Современные вопросы науки и образования – XXI век. Сборник научных трудов по материалам Международной заочной научно-практической конференции 29 февраля 2012 г. В 7 частях. Часть 2. Тамбов: ТРОО «Бизнес-Наука-Общество», 2012. С. 86-87.
Added: Sep 27, 2012
Кирюшин С. А. В кн.: Научно-техническая конференция профессорско-преподавательского состава, аспирантов и студентов «Строительный комплекс-96». Тезисы докладов. Часть 4: Исследования по технологии, организации, экономике и управлению строительством. Ч. 4. Н. Новгород: Нижегородская государственная архитектурно-строительная академия, 1996. С. 56-56.
Added: Jul 4, 2012
Плотников А. Т. 2. Саратов: Издательство ЦПМ «Академия Бизнеса», 2011.
Added: May 11, 2012
Пересецкий А. А., Карминский А. М., Головань С. В. и др. Препринты Научно-исследовательского центра РЭШ. WP. Научно-исследовательский центр РЭШ, 2009. № WP/2009/084.
Kazakhstan banking system is traditionally supposed to be more advanced than the Russian one. Since 2003 international accounting system was adopted in Kazakhstan and since 2005 Basel-2 norms were introduced (In Russia — no earlier than 2009). In the paper banks’ data for 2002– 2006 are used to estimate models of the banks’ technical efficiency and models of Moody’s bank ratings. In contrast to some previous papers, no significance difference is found for the average banks’ technical efficiency scores for the two countries at lest for the period 2002–2006. The rating models do not show significant difference in Moody’s experts approach for Russian and Kazakhstan banks’ ratings.
Added: Jun 15, 2013
Гапонова О. С. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского, 2006.
Added: Jun 1, 2012
Ларионова М. В. Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2012. № 1. С. 34-69.
Added: May 15, 2012