Стратегическое планирование предпринимательской деятельности в цепях поставок
Уваров С. А.
Маркетинг взаимодействия и экономика предпринимательства: Ученые записки диссертационного совета Д 212.354.16.
Edited by: Г. Л. Багиев Вып. 1. СПб.: Астерион, 2015.
Added: Jul 26, 2012
Сабаткоев Т. Р., Султанов Р. Р. Логистика и управление цепями поставок. 2012. № 2 (49). С. 25-32.
At this article we describe the benefits from integration not just within one supply chain, but within a net of different supply chains around the world. Today, there is no single methodological approach to integration with companies from different supply chains. However, with thoughtful approach to information management all potential risks from integration with vendors from other supply chains can be minimized, and at the same time benefits from integration with vendors from other supply chains can improve the efficiency of each integrated company, improving its competitive advantage. We will show which major issues the integration on global level can solve, from which modules the integration system should consist and which principles it should follow.
Added: May 30, 2012
Развитие опорной сети региональных транспортно-логистических центров на территории Республики Казахстан
Прокофьева Т. А., Тулендиев Е. Е., Ювица В. Н. Железнодорожный транспорт. 2010. № 7. С. 64-68.
Added: Oct 2, 2012
Мищенко А. В., Карабулина Е. Е. Логистика сегодня. 2010. № 6. С. 380-388.
Added: Oct 17, 2012
Жичкин А. М., Гурьянова С. Ю. М.: Московский государственный институт электроники и математики, 2010.
Added: Apr 12, 2012
Кирюшин С. А. В кн.: Стратегическое управление предприятиями, организациями и регионами: сборник статей Всероссийской научно-практической конференции. Ч. 1. Пенза: РИО ПГСХА, 2007. С. 166-168.
Added: Jul 6, 2012
Направления совершенствования нормативной правовой базы в сфере стратегического планирования. Аналитический доклад (по результатам мониторинга реализации Федерального закона от 28 июня 2014 г. № 172-ФЗ «О стратегическом планировании в Российской Федерации»)
Клименко А. В., Королев В. А., Двинских Д. Ю. и др. Государственное и муниципальное управление. WP8. Высшая школа экономики, 2016. № WP8/2016/03.
Added: Oct 19, 2016
Sokolov A., Chulok A., Mesropyan V. R. Science, Technology and Innovation. WP BRP. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. 19/STI/2013.
Currently the framework conditions for science and technology and innovation (STI) policy have changed significantly in Russia: a system of technology forecasting has been established, which focuses on ensuring the future needs of the manufacturing sector of the national economy. This system was supposed to be the main part of the state strategy planning system which is currently being formed. Over the last decade dozens of science and technology forward-looking projects have been implemented, among which 3 cycles of long-term S&T Foresight stand out prominently. The Foresight was developed by the request of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. The development of the 3rd cycle of long-term Foresight includes both normative («market pull») and research («technology push») approaches. The project involved more than 2,000 experts and more than 200 organizations. Within the project a network of six sectoral Foresight centers was created on the basis of leading universities. The article describes the most important issues of future studies in Russia and presents the principles which formed the basis for the long-term science and technology (S&T) Foresight until 2030. The authors explore its position in the national technology Foresight system and the possibilities for the implementation of its results by the key stakeholders of the national innovation system and on the level of STI policy. Eventually Russian experience could be fairly interesting and useful for many other countries with similar socio-economic features and barriers
Added: Oct 10, 2013
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2016. No. 2.
This paper explores business transactions in the context of the principle of legality. It will be argued that Article 168 of the Russian Civil Code, as a meta-rule, contains three types of rules: 1) rules dealing with the priority of special rule and exceptions (exclusive rules); 2) rules dealing with the interpretation of general, special and exclusive rules as well as with the requirements of statutes or other legal acts violated by a transaction and established outside Article 168 of the Civil Code; 3) rules dealing with the admissibility of special rule and exceptions, as well as with the conditions of admissibility of these rules. With regard to the first group of the rules, the legislature and commercial courts consider Article 168 of the Civil Code a common base with respect to other grounds in the Civil Code and in certain other statutes for declaring transactions invalid. According to the second group of rules, the subject-matter (object) of legal interpretation consists of two elements: а) the text of Article 168 of the Civil Code; and b) the texts of legal acts, described by the generic term “statute or other legal act.” Article 168 of the Civil Code provides instructions not only for rules as objects of application of the article, but also for the methods of interpreting violated requirements. The rules of admissibility for special rule and exceptions, as well as the conditions of admissibility for these standards, are aimed at the numerous cases in which the legislature, in the Civil Code or in other legal acts, expressly establishes nullity (voidness), voidability and other legal consequences for illegal transactions. The paper also answers questions regarding the impact of recent amendments to the Russian Civil Code on using rules for business transaction invalidity in commercial courts.
Added: Feb 27, 2016
Макеева О. С. В кн.: . С. 274-284.
Added: Jul 11, 2012