The commentary provides an expert assessment of the landmark legislative changes.
The article examines the role of an abstract interpretation of acts of the highest courts in the context of the unity of judicial enforcement, due to the need to implement the constitutional prohibition of discrimination enshrined in the administration of justice. Arguing about the validity of acts of abstract interpretation, the author concludes that their binding may be deemed constitutionally justified only if the current system of legal regulation in the mechanism of denial of constitutional jurisdiction.
The article is devoted to the research of content and meaning of judicial legal positions in resolving disputes about the rights of means of individualization of legal entities, goods, services and enterprises. The article provides examples of judicial legal positions that have a significant impact on the formation of a unified jurisprudence protection of intellectual property rights