Book
Экономика предприятия
Жичкин А. М., Гурьянова С. Ю.
Similar publications
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Бикметова Т. И., Шевердина Ю. В кн.: Коммуникативистика: прикладные аспекты социально-гуманитарного знания: Материалы IV Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, 14 марта 2008. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2008. С. 22-26.
Added: Dec 5, 2012
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2016. No. 2.
This paper explores business transactions in the context of the principle of legality. It will be argued that Article 168 of the Russian Civil Code, as a meta-rule, contains three types of rules: 1) rules dealing with the priority of special rule and exceptions (exclusive rules); 2) rules dealing with the interpretation of general, special and exclusive rules as well as with the requirements of statutes or other legal acts violated by a transaction and established outside Article 168 of the Civil Code; 3) rules dealing with the admissibility of special rule and exceptions, as well as with the conditions of admissibility of these rules. With regard to the first group of the rules, the legislature and commercial courts consider Article 168 of the Civil Code a common base with respect to other grounds in the Civil Code and in certain other statutes for declaring transactions invalid. According to the second group of rules, the subject-matter (object) of legal interpretation consists of two elements: а) the text of Article 168 of the Civil Code; and b) the texts of legal acts, described by the generic term “statute or other legal act.” Article 168 of the Civil Code provides instructions not only for rules as objects of application of the article, but also for the methods of interpreting violated requirements. The rules of admissibility for special rule and exceptions, as well as the conditions of admissibility for these standards, are aimed at the numerous cases in which the legislature, in the Civil Code or in other legal acts, expressly establishes nullity (voidness), voidability and other legal consequences for illegal transactions. The paper also answers questions regarding the impact of recent amendments to the Russian Civil Code on using rules for business transaction invalidity in commercial courts.
Added: Feb 27, 2016
кредитные ресурсы, прибыль, оптимизация, управление, устойчивость, риск, неопределенность
Added: Oct 12, 2012
Яковлев А.А., Демидова О.А. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2011. No. 03.
In this work, we regard public procurement as an instrument used by the state for indirect support of enterprises. In this context, we have investigated the place that public procurements occupy in the system of relations between the business and the state; whether or not we can regard public procurements as a component in the “system of exchanges” between enterprises and authorities; and the extent to which public procurements are combined with measures for direct support of enterprises. For this investigation, we used the data from a survey of enterprises conducted by the Institute for Industrial and Market Studies at the National Research University – Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2009. Our econometric study demonstrated that in Russia, public procurements cannot be regarded as a component in the system of exchanges, and the extent of combination between direct and indirect support depends on the level of the supporting government. At the federal level, direct and indirect instruments of government support complement each other, but at the regional and local levels, direct and indirect support can both complement and substitute for each other. The effect of mutual complementation can be observed in relations with those firms, which conceal information about their ownership structure and are supposedly affiliated with regional and local bureaucrats. Our analysis gives us grounds to believe that as economic development of a region rises, direct support of enterprises declines, giving way to indirect support by means of public procurements.
Added: Dec 26, 2012
Гапонова О. С., Кулагова И. А., Сторожук А. Д. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского, 2005.
Added: Jun 1, 2012
Волков Г. М., Волков В. Г., Гурьянова С. Ю. и др. М.: Московский государственный институт электроники и математики, 2004.
Added: Jan 6, 2013
Клевченкова М. Н. В кн.: Регистрация субъектов предпринимательской деятельности: зарубежный опыт. М.: Статут, 2012. Гл. 1.2. С. 49-79.
Added: Nov 30, 2012
Макеева О. С. В кн.: . С. 274-284.
Added: Jul 11, 2012
Ч. 1. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство, 2010.
Added: Jan 18, 2013
Березовский Д. С. Вестник Московского государственного университета печати. 2011. № 2.
Added: Mar 3, 2014
Вишневская Н. Т. Проблемы рынка труда. WP3. Высшая школа экономики, 2005. № 03.
The paper examines the institute of minimum wage in developed and transition economies and in a number of the developing countries. First of all the institutional mechanism of minimum wage fixing is considered. One of the sections explores the dynamics of absolute and relative levels of minimum wage. The special attention is paid to the impact of the institute of minimum wage on the labour market. The author considers the mechanism of transmission of the minimum wage increases on the employment and unemployment dynamics. The paper also contains the result of the empirical research. The experience of many countries witnesses that large increases in minimum wage levels lead to the stagnation of the employ-ment, especially of the disadvantaged groups. The negative effect is larger for the companies with higher share of labour costs and more active use of unqualified labour, that is small businesses and agricultural enterprises. One of the main conclusions is that the minimum wage is not an effective tool of the poverty reduction as the majority of the recipients live in households of average and upper average income.
Added: Oct 13, 2012