Standardization under EU Competition Rules and US Antitrust Laws
Standardization under EU Competition Rules and US Antitrust Laws is a comprehensive and detailed legal analysis of standard-setting procedure and the regulation of standard essential patents. It deals with the competition law aspects of competitors' collaboration to create technical standards, as well as the contentious antitrust issues regarding access to standards and standard essential patents.
In this paper the recent ECJ judgment in Huawei is discussed in light of the earlier case law from the EU and the US. The Huawei case has been long awaited and many in academia hoped that it would finally deliver answers to if, when and on what terms access to so-called Standard Essential Patents would be granted under EU antitrust law. However, the question is whether Huawei is that case. On the contrary, it seems that the ECJ ruling gives room for speculation even in reference to core issues, some of which are dealt with in this paper.
The monograph considers theoretical and methodological aspects of the development of higher education, provides a historical overview of the problems of higher education in Russia and abroad, describes innovative pedagogical technologies of higher education. Special attention is devoted to the questions of psychological and pedagogical aspects of the transformation of higher education.
The purpose of the article is to draw attention to the similarities of technical regulation of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. The fact of similarity was established in a number of scientific works, including a joint Belgian-Austrian-Russian project. The convergence of two integration models is a way to overcome political confrontation and technical barriers between two integration unions. The most realistic scenario is sectoral agreements on mutual recognition of conformity assessments, like the transatlantic ones. To increase trust, it is important to develop professionalism and independence of the EAEU bodies. Joint scientific and practical projects, in turn, should contribute to shaping of a constructive agenda.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/