Сборник научных статей по корееведению студентов вузов СНГ
The article investigates the socialization families Korean revolutionaries (1920-1930). Stormy revolutionary life reduced importance of the family in society, social problems associated with the family dealt party bodies. For children Internationalist Communists built orphanages, where they were brought up, studied and prepared profession. Analysis of life Pak Viviana and her parents Park Honyena and Chu Sedyuk showed that dedicating his entire life to the struggle for the liberation of Korea, parents depend on external circumstances and the conditions of existence, not on their own have been alienated from their child. In one family, three different fates. Creative activities Park Viviana once again proves how the Korean people hardworking and talented.
The report is considered part of the Soviet Koreans in the construction of the socialist state - the DPRK. Since 1946, after the liberation of the Korean Peninsula for rehabilitation and construction of the state, the Soviet leadership sent from the Soviet specialists in different fields from the Soviet Koreans. According to the identified archival materials in North Korea sent experts irrigation, hydrometeorological and manufacturing communications equipment, technical assistance in the preparation of plans for the rehabilitation of industrial enterprises and specialist advisers to work in Korean organizations to work in the field of science, culture and health. Soviet specialists sent to North Korea until 1958. It is difficult to agree with the findings of previous research that Soviet Koreans were supposedly free entry and exit in the DPRK. Registration forms the members and alternate members of the CPSU (b) - Koreans living in the Soviet Union were made in 1944. Lists Koreans citizens of the Soviet Union, aimed to North Korea in 1946-1950,. for teaching and others. work and their family members (properties and help them) were also under strict control. As scientific interest, and reserve lists of Stage III (personal affairs Koreans citizens of the Soviet Union, not left to work in North Korea), dating back to 1946 year.
The article considers the Views of L. N. Tolstoy not only as a representative, but also as a accomplisher of the Enlightenment. A comparison of his philosophy with the ideas of Spinoza and Diderot made it possible to clarify some aspects of the transition to the unique Tolstoy’s religious and philosophical doctrine. The comparison of General and specific features of the three philosophers was subjected to a special analysis. Special attention is paid to the way of thinking, the relation to science and the specifics of the worldview by Tolstoy and Diderot. An important aspect is researched the contradiction between the way of thinking and the way of life of the three philosophers.
Tolstoy's transition from rational perception of life to its religious and existential bases is shown. Tolstoy gradually moves away from the idea of a natural man to the idea of a man, who living the commandments of Christ. Starting from the educational worldview, Tolstoy ended by creation of religious and philosophical doctrine, which were relevant for the 20th century.
This important new book offers the first full-length interpretation of the thought of Martin Heidegger with respect to irony. In a radical reading of Heidegger's major works (from Being and Time through the ‘Rector's Address' and the ‘Letter on Humanism' to ‘The Origin of the Work of Art' and the Spiegel interview), Andrew Haas does not claim that Heidegger is simply being ironic. Rather he argues that Heidegger's writings make such an interpretation possible - perhaps even necessary.
Heidegger begins Being and Time with a quote from Plato, a thinker famous for his insistence upon Socratic irony. The Irony of Heidegger takes seriously the apparently curious decision to introduce the threat of irony even as philosophy begins in earnest to raise the question of the meaning of being. Through a detailed and thorough reading of Heidegger's major texts and the fundamental questions they raise, Haas reveals that one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century can be read with as much irony as earnestness. The Irony of Heidegger attempts to show that the essence of this irony lies in uncertainty, and that the entire project of onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology, therefore needs to be called into question.
The article is concerned with the notions of technology in essays of Ernst and Friedrich Georg Jünger. The special problem of the connection between technology and freedom is discussed in the broader context of the criticism of culture and technocracy discussion in the German intellectual history of the first half of the 20th century.