The article is devoted to the problem of determining the legality and validity of judicial decisions, the correlation of national standards of fairness act in a civil trial with the standard of a fair trial. The author analyzes the novel in a civil procedural law for compliance with the international obligations of the Russian Federation in the field of human rights, reproduced in Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In this article legal problems caused by terminological uncertainty and absence of unequivocal and constant concept of “valuation activity” are revealed. Issue of the concept volume is considered on the basis of determination of its generic and specific features. The approach to definition of the concept as a totality of relations connected to the cost definition is analyzed.
In the article the author analyses a law phenomenon, which hasn’t been given a deep theoretical development in the law science of our country so far – nullification of the law in the jury trial. Having taken into account certain points of view of our country’s and foreign researches, the author gives his own view upon the considering phenomenon and suggests taking into the scientific turn of speech the author’s variant of the definition “nullification of the law in the jury trial”.
The subject of this article - is the research of public interest in Russian civil proceedings. The author compares the private interest and the public interest as well the public, state and society interest in law and draws conclusions about their similarities and differences. The article deals with the specific manifestation of public interest in civil proceeding (abstract and specific) and investigates problems of using this term in the text of the law and practice.