• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 12
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Козлова М. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2014. С. 188-218.

Comparative content analysis of school textbooks of the Soviet and post-Soviet period of Russian history allows us to conclude the increasing individualization of the moral sphere in the Russian society.

Added: Jan 25, 2015
Article
Симонова О. А., Козлова М. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2016. С. 106-122.

This article considers various aspects of the new work ethic that has emerged in Russia’s rural population. This is achieved, in the main, by through an analysis of the verbal markers employed in moral emotions. The decision to concentrate on emotions emerged in the aftermath of a more general study of the social and structural conditions in the Russian countryside, which resulted in interviews abounding with villagers’ representations of negative emotions. Building on the existing body of work on the sociology of emotions, which has in the main focused on studies of shame and envy, the authors have identified new demonstrations of emotion arising from new socio-cultural conditions in the Russian village. This includes "contempt" for rural/physical labour from both the immediate surrounding environment and wider society more generally. This emotional backdrop brings with it negative effects such as shame and envy that, in turn, corrode self-esteem and self-efficacy among the rural population, leading even to withdrawal from active employment on the land and the weakening of social ties. As a result, the rural ethical worldview views work as a thing needed purely in order to meet one’s basic needs, a position that weakens any aspirations toward economic success and simultaneously promotes a sense of endurance and suffering among the rural population who are forced by ‘necessity’ to do such hard and ‘dirty’ work.

Added: Feb 12, 2016
Article
Гаврилов К. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2016. С. 317-330.
The article describes the contribution of Ulrich Beck (1944–2015) to the sociology of risk. His work «Risk society» had a significant impact on the development of the sociology of risk. For example, the ideas related to the social distribution and placement of risk, specificity of responsibility in the modern era, as well as the changing role of science demonstrate the provocativeness of Beck’s thesis and its significance for the ensuing discussion on these subjects. We also analyze the reflexivity of Beck’s works, his ability to respond to the pressing problems of our time using his own theoretical framework, and his attention to criticism and willingness to transform his arguments. We describe an aspect of the transformation of Beck’s theory that is related to the move from taking into account the adverse effects of risks as a consequence of modernization to the attempts to find positive effects of risks in his works on cosmopolitanism and the metamorphosis of the world.
Added: Mar 15, 2017
Article
Омельченко Е. Л. Социологический ежегодник. 2011. № 2011. С. 243-263.

The paper presents an analysis of the key events associated with changes in youth culture and civic activities in modern Russia, occurring during the first decade of the 21 st century. Discursive representations of youth typical for this period (government programs directed toward the youth theme, media projects, activist initiatives), as well as policy responses to the growth of youth activities, including projects of youth mobilization, are also discussed. A key event - the financial and economic crisis (recession) in 2008 - is regarded as a turning point / the turn of the century, which particularly affected the reconceptualization of the youth question in modern Russia in different dimensions: political-activist, patriotic, urban, subcultural and others. In this article we suggest a new focus of considering new forms of youth activism, through the prism of the solidarity approach. We analyze key trends in new youth solidarities in the political, cultural and economic dimensions.

Added: Sep 24, 2012
Article
Покровский Н. Е. Социологический ежегодник. 2011. № 2011. С. 45-47.

Added: Sep 24, 2012
Article
Садыков Р. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2016. С. 16-32.

The article discusses approaches to the definition of social cohesion, challenges of the conceptualization discussed. Definitions of social cohesion vary not only from one studying it discipline to another, but inside this disciplines as well. Today, "social cohesion" - is not a concept, but the variety different ones. In addition to academic interest, research cohesion stimulated by political debate, in which the term has become increasingly popular. The article begins with a general reconstruction of the cohesion concepts in the classical works on sociology. In the following parts of the paper questions connected with the definition of social cohesion are examined. In studies of small groups we observed group and individual levels of social cohesion.

 

Early studies of cohesion in social and psychological works considered cohesion in terms of attractiveness of the group to its members. This interpretation has been criticized for its emphasis on the subjective perception of individuals and lack of attention to the group characteristics of cohesion. However, emphasis on groups has disadvantages. Interrelation and contrast between the two levels of cohesion is one of the most serious problems in the research of cohesion. There is an acute question of the interrelationship between rational and affective factors of cohesion. Researchers disagree on whether to consider the cohesion as a process or some condition. In many works cohesion appears as a synonym of solidarity and trust, and in different ways relates to such concepts as inclusion, social capital, social diversity, poverty. Later studies of social cohesion are mainly oriented to the multi-dimensional model. Social cohesion is presented in such studies as a composite concept, which reduces the interaction of independent factors.

 

Despite a long tradition of research into social cohesion and the development of sophisticated instruments to measure it in different groups, the scientists are far from agreement on the single definition. The paper proposes a new approach to the design of the most successful definition of social cohesion. The essence of this approach is to appeal to the everyday usage of the "cohesion" concept. Ordinary language is the key to understanding the cultural context (the "form of life"), which belongs to members of a particular community. Understanding the categories of ordinary language is not aimed at finding their essence but not a description of how and in what circumstances members of observed community use these categories. Search of the ordinary values of social cohesion is a variant of the necessary preparatory work, which is often by passed in research practice. Attention to use the concept of "cohesion" in ordinary language practice avoids confusion and controversy surrounding the definition of cohesion, providing a reliable criterion for its understanding.

Added: Aug 18, 2016
Article
Симонова О. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2014. С. 148-187.

The article is dedicated to the latest directions in sociology: the sociology of morality and sociology of emotions. The author discusses the causes of the current revival of the sociology of morality which tightly bound to research of the moral emotions. This state of things opens the new fields for the cooperation of sociologists and social psychologists. Also the author traces the traditions in research of moral emotions in sociology and social psychology with special focus on sociological research of shame and guilt. Thus the author comes to the conclusion that the renaissance of sociology of morality is due to rapid upgrowth of the sociology of emotions where moral emotions are studied on the basis of the identity theories.

 

Added: Dec 20, 2014
Article
Симонова О. А. Социологический ежегодник. 2009. № 1. С. 254-261.
Added: Mar 2, 2011