• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 175
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Оберемко О. А. Социологический журнал. 1995. Т. 2. № 2.
Added: Oct 27, 2010
Article
Radaev V. V. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal. 2000. Vol. 3-4. P. 186-200.
Added: Sep 11, 2012
Article
Харламов Н. А. Социологический журнал. 2008. № 2. С. 180-185.
Added: Nov 8, 2008
Article
Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р., Кононенко Р. В. Социологический журнал. 2009. № 4. С. 171-180.
Added: Mar 16, 2010
Article
Абрамов Р. Н. Социологический журнал. 2010. № 3. С. 107-122.
Added: Sep 28, 2011
Article
Масловский М. В. Социологический журнал. 2011. № 1. С. 5-9.

В статье представлено формирование социологической концепции Й. Арнасона, выделены ее теоретические источники, раскрыты особенности его подхода к исследованию обществ советского типа, охарактеризованы основные положения анализа советской модели модерна.

Added: Feb 20, 2014
Article
Грязнова О. С., Магун В. С. Социологический журнал. 2011. № 1. С. 53-73.

Basic Human Values of the Russian teachers are compared with those of their colleagues from the 27 European countries, using the Schwartz Value Survey data collected in the 1990s. It was found that the average Russian teacher is extremely high in Security and extremely low in Hedonism. In addition the Russian teachers often leave their colleagues behind in the scores on Self-Enhancement (Achievement and Power) and Conformity-Tradition but often hang back in the commitment to Self-Direction and Self-Transcendence (the latter combines the values of Benevolence and Universalism). The coincidence between relative value scores of the Russian teachers and the conclusions drawn from cross-country comparison of the national samples as well as value similarity between Russia and some other countries of similar level of economic and political development are discussed. The paper illustrates the disparity between research results and common ideological stereotypes.

Added: Sep 14, 2012
Article
Магун В. С., Грязнова О. С. Социологический журнал. 2011. № 1. С. 53-73.
Added: Dec 3, 2010
Article
Троцук И. В. Социологический журнал. 2006. № 1-2. С. 183-193.
Added: Jan 22, 2017
Article
Социологический журнал. 2011. № 2. С. 21-38.
Added: Jan 18, 2012
Article
Краснопольская И. И., Солодова Г. С. Социологический журнал. 2012. № 4. С. 2-12.

In a basis of article lays understanding of the nature of a stranger and the group, offered by G. Simmel. Presence of a stranger is one of necessary elements for comprehension and maintenance of unity of group. Main attention of the article is given to a specific character of interactions of group and stranger, to how group supports its own borders and prevents penetration of a stranger into its community. Reasons why group does not accept stranger and why he cannot become a full-fledged member are considered in the article. It is suggested that group has, supports and constructs its own borders, which, on the one hand, limit what is inside the group, its unity and solidarity. On the other hand, borders prevent approaching of stranger with group and its penetration into internal system of interactions. Borders in the article are understood as special spatial limitations or social practices that determine social interactions.

 

Added: Jun 12, 2013
Article
Абрамов Р. Н. Социологический журнал. 2012. № 4. С. 5-23.

This article analyzes the theoretical approaches to the investigation of nostalgia in the social sciences. Nostalgia has become an important element of interaction of individual and social consciousness of the past. The concept of nostalgia needs theoretical conceptualization. Now it is used as a convenient metaphor that describes a complex range of emotional experiences associated with the past. This article provides an overview of current concepts of nostalgia and to comment on the further theoretical development of the concept.

Added: Feb 17, 2013
Article
Кон И. С. Социологический журнал. 2008. № 2. С. 123-126.
Added: Oct 17, 2013
Article
Моляренко О. А. Социологический журнал. 2017. Т. 23. № 4. С. 104-120.

The reflection of the disclosed observations and in-depth interviews (conducted with state and municipal officials and employees of state and municipal institutions), conducted by the author throughout the course of 6 years of field research in over 150 municipalities, including ones collected within the framework of 2 projects specially focused on the quality of statistical and registration activities, in conjunction with the thematic systematization of scientific literature on this subject, has allowed to identify 3 basic groups of reasons for the restrictions and distortions of statistics.

The first group contains an unavoidable often over-simplified representation of socio-economic processes on behalf of the state for the sake of registrability. A number of other conceptual and methodological factors also form this group. The second focuses on the problems of unintended systematical real methods of primary data collection and processing differences from the formal, and also on the distortions of statistics associated with the specifics of the administrative-territorial information gathering system. In other words, the technological restrictions and distortions are gathered in the second section. The third group includes the deliberate falsification of indicators to improve the assessment of authorities’ efficiency, together with other deformations of socio-psychological origin arising due to the fact that statistics are not a neutral tool.

The purpose of this article is to systematize and give a detailed description of the mechanisms of socio-economic and other processes of distortion by means of the optics of authorities, as well as to formulate possible ways of improving the quality of information. The following tasks are identified in order to achieve the main objective: a consistent detailed consideration of the causes and consequences of the restrictions and distortions, a rethinking and factor classifying of the content of domestic and foreign research on this topic through the results of our own field qualitative research.

The author concludes that official statistics in the Russian Federation have lost their referential function; also there is an increasing gap between those indicators accumulated by the subjects of official statistical accounting, together with the image of reality formed on their basis, and the reality itself. “The dead zones” (processes, objects, aspects and features which are not visible to the managers) are found in all sectors of society and authority’s activity: in the assessments of economic activity, social status and living standards of the population, recording offences and crimes, registration of municipal property — in some cases it can be large-scale and in other cases it could be relatively insignificant.

The author assumes that poor quality of information is one of the major reasons for the inefficiency of domestic public administration. The described conditions of the system seem to be an institutional trap; the transformation of official statistics, registration processes and authorities’ vision system can only come at significant a cost, and so the status quo remains standing. The author offers possible ways to solve the considered issues, in case the government does see the need to improve the quality of statistical data.

Added: Nov 28, 2017