• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 52
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Кудрявцева Е. В. Российская юстиция. 2002. № 1.
Added: Feb 18, 2010
Article
Назмутдинов Б. В. Российская юстиция. 2010. № 8. С. 55-60.

Евразийство,   идеократия,   политическая философия,   Форма правления

Added: Oct 11, 2012
Article
Позднякова Е. А. Российская юстиция. 2015. № 5. С. 63-66.
Added: Oct 5, 2015
Article
Колоколов Н. А. Российская юстиция. 2011. № 4. С. 29-33.
Added: Dec 6, 2012
Article
Ковтун Н. Н. Российская юстиция. 2013. № 12. С. 47-49.
Added: Jan 20, 2014
Article
Михайлов В. К. Российская юстиция. 2016. № 1. С. 58-61.

The necessity of setting provisions concerning regional commissioners within federal legislation is settled down with the purpose of universalizing and strengthening state guarantees which provide human rights and freedoms protection. It is being proved that even adopted in 2015 Federal law from 6 April 2015 №76-FZ “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation in order to improve Human Rights Commissioners’ activities” has occurred to be unequal to the task. Merits and demerits from this act and also from current relevant subjects’ legislation are noticed and also compared with each other and to the basic principles of functioning of human rights commissioners’ institutes. It is supposed to enlarge the powers with which regional commissioners are vested by granting them the right to go to courts of general jurisdiction and also to statutory courts of subjects. It should be enshrined in federal legislation and be done in order to improve the activities of regional commissioners and to strengthen guarantees of human rights protection on their territories.

Added: Jan 22, 2016
Article
Соколов Т. В. Российская юстиция. 2014. № 12. С. 36-39.
Added: Oct 11, 2018
Article
Чаплинский А. В., Плаксин С. М. Российская юстиция. 2017. № 10. С. 43-46.

The article is devoted to the activities of the Russian Government and federal executive bodies on preparation, discussion and examination of bills on preparlament stage. The authors argues that the efficiency of the federal legislative process is largely dependent on method of organization of law drafting activities of the Russian Government. The article deals with three major shortcomings of law drafting activities of the Government, dramatically reducing its efficiency: the lack of a systematic regulation, excessive complication of the procedure of bill’s preparation, the lack of normative timeframe for completion of individual stages. Particular attention is paid to identifying duplication: preparing of government bills includes 3 public examination, similar in content and form; 2 legal examination with the same subject and 2 partially overlapping examination, evaluating the impact of the bill on the business environment. The author formulated proposals for solution, based on the analysis of deficiencies.

Added: Feb 7, 2018
Article
Масленникова С. В. Российская юстиция. 2013. № 7. С. 38-41.

The article examines the draft of russian Code of administrative prosedure. The Code is seen as a positive institute for the russian legal system.

Added: Mar 26, 2015
Article
Васильева С. В. Российская юстиция. 2013. № 7. С. 38-41.

The article provides a legal appraisal of the draft Code of administrative court procedure, introduced in the State Duma in March 2013. by President of the Russian Federation.

Added: Nov 18, 2013
Article
Соболева А. К. Российская юстиция. 2000. № 10. С. 44-46.
Added: Feb 24, 2010
Article
Ковтун Н. Н. Российская юстиция. 2010. № 5. С. 29-34.
Added: Oct 26, 2012
Article
Маркунцов С. А. Российская юстиция. 2013. № 9. С. 13-16.

The article considers different approaches to the classification of legal prohibition in the criminal law. The author concludes that the most of general theoretical classifications of a legal prohibitions are hardly applicable to a legal prohibition in the criminal law. At the same time in the science of criminal law has its own classification of criminal law prohibitions, having more practical, applied value.

Added: Nov 17, 2013
Article
Сердюков А. В. Российская юстиция. 2010. № 5. С. 54-56.
Added: May 13, 2010
Article
Ковтун Н. Н. Российская юстиция. 2010. № 5. С. 29-34.
Added: Jun 25, 2010