• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 69
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Калмыкова А. В., Терещенко Л. К. Право и экономика. 2011. № 7.
Added: Oct 12, 2013
Article
Терещенко Л. К. Право и экономика. 2011. № 7. С. 4-9.
Added: Nov 28, 2011
Article
Шоренков Р. Н. Право и экономика. 2012. № 5. С. 2-7.
The given article is devoted to research of questions administrative procedure for appeal of acts of tax and customs bodies, office holders affirmative action (failure to act). The author considers the most vital problem aspects of defense of rights taxpayer in the administrative order and question about correlation of administrative and judicial order appeal forms.
Added: Aug 13, 2012
Article
Чураков В. Д. Право и экономика. 2016. № 8. С. 55-71.

The content of consolidated reports about regulatory impact assessment, formed by drafters of legal acts, is analyzed in the paper. The consolidated reports have been reviewed for compliance with requirements of information provision. Completeness and quality of reports have been investigated. The research provides a solid ground for identifying problems of regulatory impact assessment and proposing methods of solution.

Added: Sep 29, 2016
Article
Tikhomirov Y. A. Право и экономика. 2004. No. 3.
Added: Dec 2, 2008
Article
Богданова А. В. Право и экономика. 2012. № 12. С. 59-65.
Added: Feb 10, 2013
Article
Будник Р. А. Право и экономика. 2016. № 8. С. 36-41.

The paper examines the role and place of dispositive principle in the system of intellectual property rights. The principle is being considered as the basis of an inclusive mechanism of copyright regulation by civil law.

Added: Oct 23, 2016
Article
Павловская О. Ю. Право и экономика. 2015. № 1. С. 74-79.

in article the author touches upon the legal aspects and explores the problems of occupation level and employment of persons with disabilities on the basis of law enforcement practice

Added: Feb 14, 2015
Article
Власова А. С. Право и экономика. 2012. № 1. С. 65-68.

This article is devoted to the content and interconnection analysis of the categories «interest» and «entrepreneurial risk». The logical connection analysis of the categories is carried out by using not only the theoretical point of view, but also the practice of application.

Added: Sep 9, 2012
Article
Шабров Р. В. Право и экономика. 2010. № 7. С. 43-49.

The article is aimed at researching and finding gaps in the state regulation of information support for the attraction of foreign investments. In addition, the issue of foreign investors' access to information is examined.

 

 

Added: Oct 10, 2012
Article
Павловская О. Ю. Право и экономика. 2013. № 12. С. 45-49.
Added: Dec 22, 2013
Article
Павловская О. Ю. Право и экономика. 2018. № 12. С. 12-17.

The article is devoted to the actual problems of legal regulation of self-employment. A comparative historical and legal analysis of certain provisions of the legislative regulation of self-employment in the period of the USSR and in modern Russia. The foreign experience in this sphere is considered. The article presents an overview of the opinions of a number of researchers and the author's own position on the criteria that would distinguish the concepts of "self-employment" and "entrepreneurship". Attention is paid to the branch of self-employment as a legal institution and the issue of legalization of the legal status of self-employed citizens.

Added: Dec 24, 2018
Article
Гринев В. П. Право и экономика. 2015. № 7. С. 37-44.
Added: Aug 18, 2015
Article
Алексеевская Е. И. Право и экономика. 2018. № 4. С. 73-78.

Aimed at raising the effectiveness of the judicial system and budget expenditure, this article views it through the Queue Theory, which allows solving a non-trivial task of determining the system’s type and key parameters.

The Russian judicial system is a complex network of queuing systems with a discretionary number of service centers (judges), each being a queuing system itself. It simultaneously includes multi-channel and single-channel queuing systems, is stochastic, non-linear and open. The demand flow is heterogeneous, without consequences or losses and has different priority classes (absolute or relative priority). It may be described as stochastic with an uneven intensity and dynamic prioritization.

This article defines three parameters of the conceptual judiciary model: structural, stress and functional. It also points to the problems of the judicial system viewed as a mathematical model, which must be addressed by the rational disciplines of buffering and service.

Added: Jun 2, 2018