In the article the urgent and important issues that arose during the discussion of bills, devoted to the legal institution of accreditation in Russia. It is shown, that the provisions of the legal act regulating the accreditation, insufficient exercise of normative-legal regulation of such complex legal phenomenon as accreditation. It is noted that the legal science has been unable to provide evidence-based recommendations on the legal regulation of accreditation as a legal instrument.
The article is devoted to the functioning of the permitting system in Russia. Accent is made on the authorization powers of the executive bodies of the constituent members of the Russian Federation. The features of demarcation of authorization powers between the Russian Federation bodies and the regional executive bodies on the subject of joint jurisdiction.
Рассматривается историческая перспектива вопроса ответственности государства и должностных лиц за вред, причиненный невластными субъектами. Затрагивается также исторический зарубежный опыт.
The article jusitifies the need of overcoming the purely jurisdictional approach to the administrative law and overestimated role of the Administrative Code, as well as forming the anticipating support system for the country's functioning. Focus on organization of management of state affairs allow to develop a mechanism of stable influence of principles, institutes and norms of administrative law and development of other branches of law and, eventually, on social and economic and political process, stable international and legal development.
The article describes the stages of administrative law science development and explains the conditions for renewal of its certain provisions. A new system of science is proposed, modern administrative and legal institutes of regulation, competence of subjects, discretion, risks, etc., are considered in detail. Proposals on improvement of the administrative laws are subsantiated.
In the article the author analyzes the problem of versatility of the law and manufacturability of administrative regulations. It is shown, that at the present stage the concept of technology in legally significant activities remains a metaphor.
The article reveals the problem of realization of criminal liability for willful evasion of disclosure or provision of information on the securities market. The author draws attention to the complexity of proving major damage as a necessary feature of the crime. As one of the options for increasing the effectiveness of Art. 185.1 Criminal Code RF the author considers the question of a possible replacement in her construction feature “major damage” on administrative prejudice.
The article examines the influence of the ideas of Professor B.V. Rossinskiy to development national administrative law and science of public administration. The author analyzes his views on the organization of management processes, approaches to the functioning management systems both at the state level and in life.