• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 99
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Лебедев А. Н. Психологический журнал. 2008. Т. 29. № 1. С. 133-137.
Added: Feb 9, 2010
Article
Золотарева А. А. Психологический журнал. 2011. Т. 32. № 6. С. 62-69.

The review of theoretical conceptions about perfectionistic self-presentation in foreign psychology is presented in the article. The history of creation of original version of “Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale” is described. The results of Russian-language adaptation of “Perfectionistic Self-Presentation Scale” are presented. The main limitations and resources for the development of the questionnaire are described.

Added: Mar 17, 2013
Article
Апанович В. В., Знаков В. В., Александров Ю. И. Психологический журнал. 2017. Т. 38. № 5. С. 80-96.

Approbation of the Russian-language version of Analytic-Holistic Scale (N = 260) have been conducted. Convergent validity have been verified by means of Rational-Experiential Inventory (R. Pacini, S. Epstein), Metapersonal Self-Interpretation (T. DeCicco, M. Stroink), Independent–Interdependent Self-Interpretation (T. Singelis). Satisfactory psychometric characteristics have been obtained. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α – 0.663), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.576, p = .008) are satisfactory. Interpretable significant correlations between Analytic-Holistic Scale and other scales under study have been revealed, thus confirming the Scale’s validity. The results indicate that Analytic-Holistic Scale can be used for analytic–holistic thinking study in Russian culture.

Added: Jan 17, 2020
Article
Гулевич О. А. Психологический журнал. 2006. № 3. С. 68-77.
Added: Oct 1, 2012
Article
Семенов И. Н. Психологический журнал. 2015. Т. 36. № 6. С. 45-54.
Added: Feb 26, 2016
Article
Лобанова Т. Н. Психологический журнал. 2015. Т. 36. № 2. С. 87-98.

New classifi cation grounds for assigning of characteristics and types of interests are proposed, the typology of interests actual for employees is offered. Structural model of employee’s interests that can be used for researches in organizations by managers and by psychologists as well is presented. Socio-psychological aspects of contradictions in employees interests in organization are analyzed (N = 130), correlations between interests and effi ciency of work activity are revealed (N = 30). Contradictions between different groups (intergroup, corporative) and contradictions between corporative and civil interests are considered as the most signifi cant types of contradictions. The designation of work’s perspectives, stimulation of creativity, complexifi cation of the work due to new tasks’ developing, conformation of feeling of success on-stream, creation of comfortable conditions for development are specifi ed as the way to form stably useful and socially signifi cant employees’ interests.

Added: Jul 15, 2015
Article
Веракса А. Н., Коробейникова Е. Ю., Леонов С. В. и др. Психологический журнал. 2015. Т. 36. № 6. С. 109-118.
Added: Oct 12, 2015
Article
Леонтьев Д. А. Психологический журнал. 2002. Т. 23. № 3. С. 23-30.
Added: Aug 20, 2013
Article
Золотарева А. А. Психологический журнал. 2013. Т. 34. № 2. С. 117-128.

Main conceptions about normal and pathological perfectionism in psychology are examined in the article. The results of elaboration and approbation of the original method “Differential Test of Perfectionism” are presented. The procedure of psychometric verification of scale indices is described. 

Added: Mar 17, 2013
Article
Нартова-Бочавер С. К. Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40. № 5. С. 15-26.

Abstract. The central idea of the article is the argument that the human environments may be not only a source of stress but also a resource for individual’s self-help. It is shown how two scientific areas discovered to the Russian scholars by Ancyferova’s work, namely, everyday life psychology and coping psychology, develop and interact in the contemporary psychology. It is proved that the understanding of the person’s self-organization is possible only if those environments in which the person’s daily life is realizing would be to the analysis added, and this approach to the human functioning is eco-friendly, idiographic and optimistic. The main stages of the formation of the everyday life psychology as an eclectic direction formed under the influence of psychoanalysis, anthropology, existential philosophy, and behaviorism are analyzed. Having generalized research on person-environment fit, the Person-Environment Fit Approach to Stress by R. Harrison et al. and the Socio-Ecological model by B. Little, considering environment as a factor of quality of life, are presented. It is concluded that it would be efficiently, to use the recovery potential of basic human environments is made, taking into account individual’s personality.Abstract. The central idea of the article is the argument that the human environments may be not only a source of stress but also a resource for individual’s self-help. It is shown how two scientific areas discovered to the Russian scholars by Ancyferova’s work, namely, everyday life psychology and coping psychology, develop and interact in the contemporary psychology. It is proved that the understanding of the person’s self-organization is possible only if those environments in which the person’s daily life is realizing would be to the analysis added, and this approach to the human functioning is eco-friendly, idiographic and optimistic. The main stages of the formation of the everyday life psychology as an eclectic direction formed under the influence of psychoanalysis, anthropology, existential philosophy, and behaviorism are analyzed. Having generalized research on person-environment fit, the Person-Environment Fit Approach to Stress by R. Harrison et al. and the Socio-Ecological model by B. Little, considering environment as a factor of quality of life, are presented. It is concluded that it would be efficiently, to use the recovery potential of basic human environments is made, taking into account individual’s personality.

Added: Jun 21, 2019
Article
Люсин Д. В., Овсянникова В. В. Психологический журнал. 2013. Т. 34. № 6. С. 82-94.

The problems of measuring the emotion recognition ability as a component of emotional intelligence are analyzed. A new method (Videotest) is proposed. It allows to measure two aspects of emotion recognition, i.e. accuracy of modality recognition and sensitivity to emotions. A psychometric analysis of the proposed method showed a satisfactory reliability and validity. Recommendations on how to improve it are discussed.

Added: Jun 2, 2013
Article
Козлова М. А., Козлов А. Психологический журнал. 2016. Т. 37. № 3. С. 60-70.

The answer to the question about the sources of cultural-specific and universal aspects of morality demands for the reference to social psychological and anthropological researches. The review is oriented to the verification of the concept of “moral grounds” (J. Haidt). We substantiated hereditary determinism of individualizing moral foundations – care and justice, while genetic tightness of group-oriented morality – ingroup cohesion and vertically is challenged. Appeal to neurobiological research allows us to imagine the brain as a communication point between genetics and environment. We considers the study of moral sphere through the prism of identity as the direction of possible integration of psychological, anthropological, genetic, and neurobiological approaches.

Added: May 12, 2016
Article
Пономарев Я., Семенов И. Н., Степанов С. Ю. Психологический журнал. 1988. Т. 9. № 4.
Added: Mar 26, 2013
Article
Улановский А. М. Психологический журнал. 2009. № 2 . С. 18-28.
Added: Oct 31, 2009
Article
Шадриков В. Д. Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40. № 2. С. 15-26.

The special factor determining a science development is the arrangement of its conceptual categories. This is completely relevant to theoretical issues of ability and giftedness studies. In present article based on the analysis of the researches, most notably native classical psychologists, and our empirical data the definition of theoretical constructs “ability” and “giftedness” is provided. The approach to determining the nature of ability is founded. The ability is considered in three dimensions: as inherent, subject-activity and personal. It is highlighted that the abilities of the human being (personality) should be considered simultaneously in three dimensions. In each dimension at that it would be shown the irregularity and heterochrony of their (abilities) development. This helps to understand the nature of a complete process of ability formation and development. The suggested concept for ability structure makes it possible for answer the basic methodological question about the relationship between inclinations and abilities. It concerns the consideration of the ability of an individual as the properties of physiological functional systems that implement certain mental functions. It is shown that the ability development is based on a definite natural foundation by completing with intellectual operations acquisition (abilities of subject of an activity), and being under control and directing impact of the motivation and moral qualities (abilities of a personality). Other implications of a proposed view on the nature of ability are discussed in the article. Given that the giftedness in majority of researches considered as qualitatively feature specificity combination of abilities that determines the success in a certain activity and based on the proposed definition of ability the concept of “giftedness” is defined. Some principal issues of giftedness theory is addressed to considerations.

Added: Jun 18, 2019
Article
Богачева Н. В. Психологический журнал. 2019. Т. 40. № 4. С. 32-45.
Added: Nov 26, 2019
Article
Петренко В. Ф. Психологический журнал. 2002. Т. 23. № 3. С. 113-121.
Added: Oct 17, 2013