• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 6
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Zinchenko O. O., Arsalidou M. Human Brain Mapping. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 955-970.

Social norms have a critical role in everyday decision-making, as frequent interaction with others regulates our behavior.  Neuroimaging studies show that social-based and fairness-related decision-making activates an inconsistent set of areas, which sometimes includes the anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and others lateral prefrontal cortices.  Social-based decision-making is complex and variability in findings may be driven by socio-cognitive activities related to social norms.  To distinguish among social-cognitive activities related to social norms we identified thirty six eligible articles in the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) literature, which we separate into two categories (a) social norm representation, and (b) norm violations.  The majority of original articles (> 60%) used tasks related with fairness norms and decision-making, such as ultimatum game, dictator game or prisoner’s dilemma; the rest used tasks related to violation of moral norms, such as scenarios and sentences of moral depravity ratings etc. Using quantitative meta-analyses we report brain common and distinct brain areas that show concordance as a function of category.  Specifically, concordance in ventromedial prefrontal regions is distinct to social norm representation processing, whereas concordance in right insula, dorsolateral prefrontal and dorsal cingulate cortices is distinct to norm violation processing. We propose a neurocognitive model of social norms for healthy adults, which could help guide future research in social norm compliance and mechanisms of its enforcement. 

Added: Nov 13, 2017
Article
Den Ouden D., Malyutina S., Basilakos A. et al. Human Brain Mapping. 2019. Vol. 40. No. 7. P. 2153-2173.

Agrammatism in aphasia is not a homogeneous syndrome, but a characterization of a nonuniform set of language behaviors in which grammatical markers and complex syntactic structures are omitted, simplified, or misinterpreted. In a sample of 71 left-hemisphere stroke survivors, syntactic processing was quantifiedwith theNorthwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Classification analyses were used to assess the relation between NAVS performance and morphosyntactically reduced speech in picture descriptions. Voxel-based and connectivity-based lesion-symptom mapping were applied to investigate neural correlates of impaired syntactic processing. Despite a nonrandom correspondence between NAVS performance and morphosyntactic production deficits, there was variation in individual patterns of syntactic processing. Morphosyntactically reduced production was predicted by lesions to left-hemisphere inferior frontal cortex. Impaired verb argument structure production was predicted by damage to left-hemisphere posterior superior temporal and angular gyrus, as well as to a ventral pathway between temporal and frontal cortex. Damage to this pathway was also predictive of impaired sentence comprehension and production, particularly of noncanonical sentences. Although agrammatic speech production is primarily predicted by lesions to inferior frontal cortex, other aspects of syntactic processing rely rather on regional integrity in temporoparietal cortex and the ventral stream.

Added: Jan 22, 2019
Article
Hung Y., Gaillard S. L., Yarmak P. et al. Human Brain Mapping. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 10. P. 4065-4082.

Inhibitory control is the stopping of a mental process with or without intention, conceptualized as

mental suppression of competing information because of limited cognitive capacity. Inhibitory control

dysfunction is a core characteristic of many major psychiatric disorders. Inhibition is generally

thought to involve the prefrontal cortex; however, a single inhibitory mechanism is insufficient for

interpreting the heterogeneous nature of human cognition. It remains unclear whether different

dimensions of inhibitory processes—specifically cognitive inhibition, response inhibition, and emotional

interference—rely on dissociated neural systems. We conducted systematic meta-analyses of

fMRI studies in the BrainMap database supplemented by PubMed using whole-brain activation

likelihood estimation. A total of 66 study experiments including 1,447 participants and 987 foci

revealed that while the left anterior insula was concordant in all inhibitory dimensions, cognitive

inhibition reliably activated specific dorsal frontal inhibitory system, engaging dorsal anterior cingulate,

dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and parietal areas, whereas emotional interference reliably

implicated a ventral inhibitory system, involving the ventral surface of the inferior frontal gyrus and

the amygdala. Response inhibition showed concordant clusters in the fronto-striatal system, including

the dorsal anterior cingulate region and extended supplementary motor areas, the dorsal and

ventral lateral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, midbrain regions, and parietal regions. We provide

an empirically derived dimensional model of inhibition characterizing neural systems underlying different

aspects of inhibitory mechanisms. This study offers a fundamental framework to advance

current understanding of inhibition and provides new insights for future clinical research into

disorders with different types of inhibition-related dysfunctions.

Added: Jun 20, 2018
Article
Pavlova A., Butorina A., Nikolaeva A. Y. et al. Human Brain Mapping. 2019. Vol. 40. No. 12. P. 3669-3681.

The contribution of the motor cortex to the semantic retrieval of verbs remains a subject of debate in neuroscience. Here, we examined whether additional engagement of the cortical motor system was required when access to verbs semantics was hindered during a verb generation task. We asked participants to produce verbs related to presented noun cues that were either strongly associated with a single verb to prompt fast and effortless verb retrieval, or were weakly associated with multiple verbs and more difficult to respond to. Using power suppression of magnetoencephalography beta oscillations (15–30 Hz) as an index of cortical activation, we performed a whole‐brain analysis in order to identify the cortical regions sensitive to the difficulty of verb semantic retrieval. Highly reliable suppression of beta oscillations occurred 250 ms after the noun cue presentation and was sustained until the onset of verbal response. This was localized to multiple cortical regions, mainly in the temporal and frontal lobes of the left hemisphere. Crucially, the only cortical regions where beta suppression was sensitive to the task difficulty, were the higher order motor areas on the medial and lateral surfaces of the frontal lobe. Stronger activation of the premotor cortex and supplementary motor area accompanied the effortful verb retrieval and preceded the preparation of verbal responses for more than 500 ms, thus, overlapping with the time window of verb retrieval from semantic memory. Our results suggest that reactivation of verb‐related motor plans in higher order motor circuitry promotes the semantic retrieval of target verbs.

Added: Jul 11, 2019
Article
Schaworonkow N., Blythe D., Kegeles J. et al. Human Brain Mapping. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 8. P. 2901-2914.

Relating behavioral and neuroimaging measures is essential to understanding human brain function. Often, this is achieved by computing a correlation between behavioral measures, e.g., reaction times, and neurophysiological recordings, e.g., prestimulus EEG alpha-power, on a single-trial-basis. This approach treats individual trials as independent measurements and ignores the fact that data are acquired in a temporal order. It has already been shown that behavioral measures as well as neurophysiological recordings display power-law dynamics, which implies that trials are not in fact independent. Critically, computing the correlation coefficient between two measures exhibiting long-range temporal dependencies may introduce spurious correlations, thus leading to erroneous conclusions about the relationship between brain activity and behavioral measures. Here, we address data-analytic pitfalls which may arise when long-range temporal dependencies in neural as well as behavioral measures are ignored. We quantify the influence of temporal dependencies of neural and behavioral measures on the observed correlations through simulations. Results are further supported in analysis of real EEG data recorded in a simple reaction time task, where the aim is to predict the latency of responses on the basis of prestimulus alpha oscillations. We show that it is possible to "predict" reaction times from one subject on the basis of EEG activity recorded in another subject simply owing to the fact that both measures display power-law dynamics. The same is true when correlating EEG activity obtained from different subjects. A surrogate-data procedure is described which correctly tests for the presence of correlation while controlling for the effect of power-law dynamics.

Added: May 13, 2015
Article
Iscan Z., Jin T. B., Kendrick A. et al. Human Brain Mapping. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 9. P. 3472-3485.

In the last decade, many studies have used automated processes to analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data such as cortical thickness, which is one indicator of neuronal health. Due to the convenience of image processing software (e.g., FreeSurfer), standard practice is to rely on automated results without performing visual inspection of intermediate processing. In this work, structural MRIs of 40 healthy controls who were scanned twice were used to determine the test–retest reliability of FreeSurfer-derived cortical measures in four groups of subjects—those 25 that passed visual inspection (approved), those 15 that failed visual inspection (disapproved), a combined group, and a subset of 10 subjects (Travel) whose test and retest scans occurred at different sites. Test–retest correlation (TRC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and percent difference (PD) were used to measure the reliability in the Destrieux and Desikan–Killiany (DK) atlases. In the approved subjects, reliability of cortical thickness/surface area/volume (DK atlas only) were: TRC (0.82/0.88/0.88), ICC (0.81/0.87/0.88), PD (0.86/1.19/1.39), which represent a significant improvement over these measures when disapproved subjects are included. Travel subjects’ results show that cortical thickness reliability is more sensitive to site differences than the cortical surface area and volume. To determine the effect of visual inspection on sample size required for studies of MRI-derived cortical thickness, the number of subjects required to show group differences was calculated. Significant differences observed across imaging sites, between visually approved/disapproved subjects, and across regions with different sizes suggest that these measures should be used with caution.

Added: Jul 13, 2015