• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 6
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Терехович В. Э. Метафизика. 2020. Т. 35. № 1. С. 8-29.

In this article, I analyze the arguments against the importance of the ontological and epistemological issues of modern physics. The connection between physics and philosophy is examined on the basis of several concepts of the connection between philosophy and science. I conclude that only physicists can effectively solve the philosophical issues of their field of science. Subsequently, it can accelerate the revolutionary transformations in the physical picture of the world.

Added: Jul 17, 2020
Article
Катречко С. Л. Метафизика. 2011. № 1. С. 31-55.

How is metaphysics possible? The answer to this question can be received by means of Kant’s transcendental method. According to Kant, the basis (background) of any metaphysics is metaphysica naturalis, which is conceived as human reason speculation demand to arise and solve questions that are beyond possible experience and exceed the limits of a current ‘physical’ situation. Thereby the man is homo metaphysicus (Aristotle. Kant). Possibility of metaphysica naturalis roots in the human faculty of imagination and is connected with our language, its metaphysics. There are two modus of the academic metaphysics. Possibility of metaphysica generalis is connected with presence in our language (resp. Mind) special metaphysical (ontologic) predicates (categories). Possibility of metaphysica specialis is connected with presence in our language (resp. Mind) wholeness, or encompassing totalities (comp. with the Encompassing of K. Jaspers).

Added: Nov 19, 2013
Article
Терехович В. Э. Метафизика. 2015. Т. 15. № 1. С. 129-152.
Added: Mar 4, 2020
Article
Терехович В. Э. Метафизика. 2019. Т. 31. № 1. С. 155-165.
Added: Mar 4, 2020
Article
Катречко С. Л. Метафизика. 2012. Т. 5. № 3. С. 130-150.
Added: Nov 19, 2013