Article
Доменное имя в системе средств индивидуализации
Вестник Высшего Арбитражного Суда Российской Федерации. 2010. № 4. С. 102-113.
Similar publications
Козичева Е. В. Маркетинг в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 3. С. 40-46.
Added: Jul 9, 2012
Титова Е. В. Экономические науки. 2010. № 12 (73). С. 90-94.
Added: Apr 13, 2012
Лушина Л. А. В кн.: Преступления против интеллектуальной собственности: материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (Нижний Новгород, 19–20 мая 2011 года). Н. Новгород: Стимул-СТ, 2011. С. 269-280.
Added: Mar 1, 2013
Kashanin A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 32/LAW/2014.
In codifying intellectual property rights, Russian legislators have left what standards of originality and creativity can be considered criteria of copyrightability a moot point. Nevertheless, it is crucial for answering questions about where the lower boundary of copyrightability lies and, consequently, what intellectual products that have an insignificant creative component, but are of high economic importance – such as databases, computer software, advertisement slogans or design work – should be copyrightable. This article addresses the problem of identifying criteria for copyrightability and non-copyrightability in the Russian legal literature by modeling various types of demarcation criteria and analyzing their strong and weak points. Analyzing debates in the legal literature warrant the conclusion that there is a trend to set looser standards for originality and creativity and grant copyright protection to works of low authorship.
Added: Feb 14, 2014
Будник Р. А. Хозяйство и право. 2012. № 3. С. 70-78.
This paper is dedicated to the establishment of inclusive legal method in the system of intellectual property rights in terms of information economy.
Added: Aug 27, 2013
Сухарева А. Е. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2017.
Added: Mar 2, 2018
Баширов М. А. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. WP BRP 29/LAW/2013.
Сloud computing is treated by most of the experts as one of the main trends of information technologies development for forthcoming years. In present article we focus on general overview of the main aspects of cloud computing services legal regime in Russia. Such aspects include, inter alia, intellectual property and contract law matters, taxation issues, execution of the agreements, warranties and representations under cloud computing agreements and personal data regulations.
Added: Jan 24, 2014
Козлов А. В. В кн.: Демократия в России: проблемы и перспективы развития. Материалы всероссийской (с международным участием) научно-практической конференции, посвященной 80-летию ДГУ, 22–24 сентября 2011 г.. Махачкала: Дагестанский государственный университет, 2011. С. 60-65.
Added: Jul 23, 2012
Edited by: И. В. Коробко Вып. 1(87). М.: Отделение подготовки и выпуска официальной информации Федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Федеральный институт промышленной собственности» (ФИПС), 2014.
Added: Apr 1, 2014
Марширов В. В., Марширова Л. Е. В кн.: Власть, бизнес, бизнес-образование: интеграция на пути модернизации. Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции (7 апреля 2011 г., г. Ульяновск, УлГТУ). Ульяновск: УлГТУ, 2011. С. 214-217.
Added: Jul 3, 2012
Панченко П. Н. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2008.
Added: Oct 24, 2012
Kashanin A. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014. No. WP BRP 30/LAW/2014.
This article addresses the problem of identifying criteria for copyrightability and non-copyrightability in the Russian legal system, especially in judicial practice. An analysis of court rulings issued over the past few years warrant the conclusion that there is a trend towards setting looser standards of originality and creativity. The article also describes a trend in Russian judicial practice to grant copyright protection to works of low authorship and goes into problems and contradictions that this entails. It compares principles that evolved in Russian law with similar principles used abroad, mainly in Germany.
Added: Jan 24, 2014
Borisova T. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 05.
The article describes and analyzes the legislative politics of revolutionary regimes in Russia in 1917-1918. The author aims to demonstrate the political meaning of the form of early Soviet legislation and its legitimizing effect. The revolutionary legislators often used specific language in the new laws as a vehicle of legitimacy, i.e. to make the people comply. The two main types of legal language used by the Bolsheviks can be interpreted from the perspective of different types of legitimacy. The revolutionary strategy used propagandistic legislation, written in the language of lay people, which urged them to act according to the new law. It can be seen as a request for acts of the people to legitimize the soviets. On the contrary, the traditional strategy employed old bureaucratic means of writing and distributing legislation to the local soviets. The language used by this strategy was closed to the understanding of a lay audience and implied traditions of obeying the law written in familiar legal language, which in turn implied rational/legal legitimacy. The second strategy had already become dominant after the first months of the Bolshevik revolution. This observation demonstrates that from the very beginning of their rule, Soviet leaders approached legislative policy from a technocratic point of view, which determined the further development of Soviet legal theory and practice.
Added: Jul 20, 2012
М.: Российский экономический университет имени Г.В. Плеханова, 2011.
Added: Dec 14, 2012
Edited by: В. Быченков Калуга: КФ РПА Минюста России, 2010.
Added: Dec 14, 2012
Mayanskiy E. arxiv.org. math. Cornell University, 2013. No. 5150.
We list all finite abelian groups which act effectively on smooth cubic fourfolds.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Тенилова Т. Л. Юридическая техника. 2009. № 3. С. 309-316.
Added: Dec 12, 2012
Edited by: М. М. Рассолов Кн. 1: Проблемы теории и истории государства и права. М.: РПА Минюста России, 2010.
Added: Dec 14, 2012
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014
This article is devoted to the legitimation and application of the standards of ex post and ex ante by courts and the executive authorities in the sphere of competition regulation. The postulates of ex post and ex ante are considered as legal principles. The principle of ex post is intended solely for judicial and administrative application; it has a deontological framework; it assumes that the legality of the activity of economic entities is assessed only on the basis of positive legal criteria in terms of the subjective rights violated; it is limited to a particular case. The traditional approach to the principle of ex post limits the scope of its application on the subjects and excessively expands its objects. The postulate of ex ante has a utilitarian basis which assumes the assessment of the application of relevant rules in the future. One of the main aims of the article is to refute the common view of lawyers and economists that a legislator applies principle of ex ante not being bound by principle of ex post, while it is the other way around for the courts and the executive authorities. The principle of ex ante may be applied not only in the process of the creation of new rules but also at the application stage for existing rules on economic competition. This is justified because the arguments of the courts and the executive authorities about a refusal to take into account the consequences of a decision in a particular case are not convincing.
Added: Apr 17, 2014