Article
Модели рейтингов банков для риск-менеджмента
Управление финансовыми рисками. 2006. № 4. С. 362-373.
Карминский А. М., Пересецкий А. А., Рыжов А. В.
Similar publications
Радионова М. В., Андрианов Д. Л. Пермь: Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет, 2012.
Added: Jan 31, 2013
Hainsworth R., Karminsky A. M., Solodkov V. M. Financial Economics. FE. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 01.
Investors are being encouraged after the global crisis to reduce their dependence on the largest credit rating agencies for risk assessments of companies and securities. Comparing risk assessments from different sources rapidly becomes non-trivial when more than three credit rating agencies are involved. We propose a method for comparing rating scales, and hence constructing correspondence diagrams and tables, thereby treating the rating scales used by different agencies as objects of study. Scales are compared by looking at sets of ratings assigned to similar entities (in this case banks) with the assumption that the risk being measured by each credit rating agency is the same for a given rated entity at a given point in time. Two ratings assigned by two credit rating agencies may differ for two reasons: the two agencies have different opinions about the relative positioning of the rated entity (e.g., issuer or security) with respect to the universe of other rated entities; both agencies position the rated entity with respect to the universe of other rated entities in the same way, but they use different symbols to represent this position. Type 1 differences should disappear when a large number of ratings are considered. The existence of type 2 differences will require a mapping from one rating scale to another. Studying international bank ratings for a five-year period shows that there are type 2 differences for the largest credit rating agencies. A mechanism for constructing mappings between scales could lead to more competition with new credit rating agencies.
Added: Aug 28, 2012
Юдкевич М. М., Панова А. А. В кн.: Контракты в академическом мире. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2011. С. 259-302.
Added: Sep 5, 2012
Edited by: А. В. Бутуханов СПб.: Отдел оперативной полиграфии НИУ ВШЭ – Санкт-Петербург, 2012.
Added: Feb 21, 2013
Черкасова В. А. Управление корпоративными финансами. 2010. № 3. С. 144-149.
Управление рисками
Ключевые слова: портфельный подход, концепция VaR, хеджирование рисков, хедж-премия, стоимость компании
Added: Oct 17, 2012
Ларионова М. В. Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2012. № 1. С. 34-69.
Added: May 15, 2012
Перфильева О. В., Заварыкина Л. В., Лопатина А. С. Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2012. № 1. С. 122-155.
Added: May 21, 2012
Карминский А. М., Костров А. В., Мурзенков Т. Н. Математические методы анализа решений в экономике, бизнесе и политике. WP7. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. № WP7/2012/04.
Added: Dec 10, 2012
Силаева В. А., Силаев А. М. Научные доклады лаборатории количественного анализа и моделирования экономики. P1. Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. № P1/2010/01.
Added: Sep 5, 2012
Пономарева Е. А., Андрюхина А. В. В кн.: Сборник статей по материалам IX научно-технической конференции студентов и преподавателей НИУ ВШЭ – Нижний Новгород «Современные проблемы в области экономики, менеджмента, бизнес-информатики, юриспруденции и социально-гуманитарных наук». Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2011. С. 17-19.
Added: Oct 10, 2012
Ражева (Еделькина) А. А. В кн.: Сборник научных статей в двух частях III Международной научно-практической конференции «Глобализация и выбор стратегии экономики России». Часть I. Ч. 1. М.: Государственный университет Министерства финансов Российской Федерации, 2012. С. 74-80.
Added: Jun 20, 2012
Королев А. В. СПб.: Издательство СПбГЭТУ "ЛЭТИ", 2011.
Added: Feb 8, 2013
Ч. 1. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство, 2010.
Added: Jan 18, 2013
Трунин П. В., Дробышевский С. М., Евдокимова Т. В. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2012.
Added: Mar 26, 2013
Added: Jun 24, 2011
Вишневская Н. Т. Проблемы рынка труда. WP3. Высшая школа экономики, 2005. № 03.
The paper examines the institute of minimum wage in developed and transition economies and in a number of the developing countries. First of all the institutional mechanism of minimum wage fixing is considered. One of the sections explores the dynamics of absolute and relative levels of minimum wage. The special attention is paid to the impact of the institute of minimum wage on the labour market. The author considers the mechanism of transmission of the minimum wage increases on the employment and unemployment dynamics. The paper also contains the result of the empirical research. The experience of many countries witnesses that large increases in minimum wage levels lead to the stagnation of the employ-ment, especially of the disadvantaged groups. The negative effect is larger for the companies with higher share of labour costs and more active use of unqualified labour, that is small businesses and agricultural enterprises. One of the main conclusions is that the minimum wage is not an effective tool of the poverty reduction as the majority of the recipients live in households of average and upper average income.
Added: Oct 13, 2012