Квалификация совместного совершения преступления с лицом, не подлежащим уголовной ответственности: новый поворот в судебной практике
У збірнику вміщено тези доповідей та повідомлень, з якими виступлять учасники Міжнародного симпозіуму "Кримінальний кодекс України 2001 р.: проблеми застосування і перспективи удосконалення", що відбудеться 21-22 вересня 2012 р. у Львівському державному університеті внутрішніх справ. У симпозіумі беруть участь відомі вчені, авторитетні фахівці з проблем сучасного кримінального права, які представляють наукові центри юридичної науки України, Російської Федерації та Республіки Біларусь, Польща, Німеччина, Молдова.
This paper is dedicated to the life and work of Artur Vladimirovich Petrovsky (1924-2006), a well-known Soviet/Russian psychologist. It illuminates his theoretical views on personality and group activity, in particular, the three-factor model of 'significant other', the concept of personalisation, and the stratometric concept of groups and collectives. His empirical works analysing the phenomena and characteristics of activity-mediated relations are described as well.
Conclusions: there is a practical necessity of increase of defi niteness of an operating regulation of ideal set, acceptance of some the conventional rules of its estimation; it is necessary to analyze more full practice positions on this point in question; monitoring of infl uence of short stories of the legislator on behavior in sphere of action of the criminal law is necessary.
1. Description of the problem. Instrumental analysis makes it possible to find the arguments of adjudication on the bounders and structure of corpus delicti, its correlation to criminal and filling-up legislation. 2. Initial theses. Corpus delicti is regarded as that expressed in criminal law doctrine result of reorganization of orders of criminal law into other practically necessary form. That happens in the process of theory and practical experience accumulation. The construction of corpus delicti is transformed for practical needs, textually expressed system of features, regulated by criminal law and characterizing deeds as a crime of a definite type. Correlation of construction of corpus delicti with law and doctrine. Corpus delicti, its algorithm. Transition from law regulations to corpus delicti can be done: 1) prog-nostically; 2) within constant analysis of law; 3) in the process of law application. 3. Stages of instrumental building of corpus delicti: prognostic, doctrinal, law applicatory. Instrumental approach to corpus delicti includes within each stage: 1) based on criminal law decision of classification of corpus delicti and its borders; 2) objective description of a factual model; 3) acception of meaning correlated with legal notions and constructions; 4) choice of the construction of the corpus delicti and disposal of characteristics; 5) verification of legitimacy, necessity and adequacy of foundation. 4. Instrumental analysis of disputable questions of understanding and application of constructions of corpus delicti. A. Functions and purposes of application of construction of corpus delicti. Functions of corpus delicti: a) modeling; b) communicative; c) identificatory; d) technological. B. Contents of corpus delicti. Contents of corpus delicti as it is traditionally regarded does not correspond to indications of crime, does not characterize features of social danger; sign of danger of penalty also does go into corpus delicti. Two variants are proposed for the discussion: widening of the borders of corpus delicti by means of introduction of signs of social danger and signs, defining individualization of penalty and to limitate corpus delicti by characteristic of criminally punished act, separating it from contents of guilt and contents of social danger. C. Structure of corpus delicti. There are two problems: division of elements of crime seems to be extremely harsh and inadequate - it is expedient to include signs of special and time limits of act, causal links, crossing signs of objective and subjective sides, first of all consequences and an object of crime, into the structure of corpus delicti. Forms of committing a criminally punished act is a crime commitment in complicity, ideal system, not finished crime.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/