Article
Комплексная оценка инвестиционной привлекательности и инвестиционной активности Российских регионов: методика определения и анализ взаимосвязей
Вопросы экономических наук. 2004. № 2. С. 96-101.
Поздняков К. К.
Similar publications
Поздняков К. К. Саарбрюкен: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
Added: Jun 27, 2012
Поздняков К. К. Внешнеэкономический бюллетень. 2004. № 4. С. 40-46.
Added: Jun 26, 2012
Кирюшин С. А. В кн.: Научно-техническая конференция профессорско-преподавательского состава, аспирантов и студентов «Строительный комплекс-96». Тезисы докладов. Часть 4: Исследования по технологии, организации, экономике и управлению строительством. Ч. 4. Н. Новгород: Нижегородская государственная архитектурно-строительная академия, 1996. С. 57-57.
Added: Jul 4, 2012
Кирюшин С. А. В кн.: О развитии инвестиционно-строительного комплекса Нижегородской области. Материалы региональной научно-практической конференции 26.02.1998 г. Доклады и тезисы. Н. Новгород: Международная академия инвестиций и экономики строительства – Нижегородское региональное отделение, 1998. С. 54-55.
Added: Jul 4, 2012
Городнов А. Г., Богатырев А. В. В кн.: Совершенствование механизмов управления предприятием. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского, 2005. С. 8-10.
Added: Jun 1, 2012
Naidenova I. N., Parshakov P. Financial Economics. FE. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 11.
It is believed that investments in intellectual capital enable a company to create a competitive advantage that results in the ability to earn economic profits and increase company value. However, this influence is reciprocal: Companies that generate more money can invest more funds in intellectual capital. The aim of this study is to use vector autoregression (VAR) to analyze the return on investments for companies in tangible and intellectual assets. This instrument allows us to take into account both the lag effect and the mutual influence of intellectual capital components.
Added: Feb 12, 2013
Поздняков К. К. Экономика и финансы. 2004. № 26. С. 73-74.
Added: Jun 25, 2012
Кривенко П. А. Научные доклады лаборатории макроэкономического анализа. WP12. Высшая школа экономики, 2010. № 03.
Added: Mar 15, 2013
Ч. 1. Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство, 2010.
Added: Jan 18, 2013
Anisimova A. I., Muradyan P. A., Vernikov A. V. SSRN Working Paper Series. Social Science Research Network, 2011. No. 1919817.
This empirical paper adds to competition and industrial organization literature by exploring the interplay between industry structure and competitiveness on local, rather than nation-wide, markets. We use micro-level statistical data for banks in two Russian regions (Bashkortostan and Tatarstan) to estimate Herfindahl-Hirschman index, Lerner index, and Panzar-Rosse model. We estimate Panzar-Rosse model in two ways: via the widely used price-equation that accounts for scale effects and then via a revenue-equation that disregards scale effects as suggested by Bikker et al. (2009). We find both regional markets to be ruled by monopolistic competition, although estimation by revenue-equation does not reject monopoly hypothesis for Tatarstan. Existence of sizeable locally-owned and operated institutions does not necessarily lead to higher competitiveness of the given regional market, and the results from non-structural methods of estimation suggest that bank competition in Bashkortostan is stronger than in Tatarstan. Going further away from aggregated analysis we compute Lerner indices in two product segments of Tatarstan – retail and corporate loans – and find that retail segment is significantly more competitive. Local banks exert more market power in corporate loans, while federal branches – in retail loans.
Added: May 14, 2012
Трунин П. В., Дробышевский С. М., Евдокимова Т. В. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2012.
Added: Mar 26, 2013
Penikas H. I. Financial Economics. FE. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 03.
The Basel Committee of Banking Supervision initiated a discussion on the most efficient practices to prevent bank managers from excessive risk-taking. This paper proposes a game-theoretical approach, describing the decision-making process by a bank manager who chooses his own level of risk and effort. If the level of risk implies the variability of the future outcome, the amount of effort applied affects the probability of a positive outcome. Although effort is unobserved for the bank’s stakeholders, the risk level is under control, and is associated with certain indicators such as capital adequacy ratio or leverage level. The risk-neutral utility function of a bank manager and a binary game outcome of gaining profit or loss for a bank are assumed. Starting from the general incentive contract scheme having the fixed and variable parts of remuneration, it is proposed that differentiating the variable part of remuneration is sufficient to motivate bank managers to make fewer risky decisions. More precisely, the variable part of remuneration (e.g. the share of the bank’s profit) needs to be higher in proportion to the higher variance of outcome for the high -risk outcome case to stimulate a bank manager to opt for lower-risk decisions in place of higher-risk situations.
Added: May 3, 2012
Penikas H. I., Titova Y. Financial Economics. FE. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 02.
In this paper we elaborate a simple model that allows for the predicting of possible reactions from financial institutions to more stringent regulatory measures introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in regard to global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The context is framed by a 2011 BCBS document that proposes higher capital requirements for global systemically important banks. We attempt to analyze bank interactions in an oligopolistic market that is subject to demand constraints on loan amounts and additional loss absorbency requirements introduced by the regulator. We distinguish between the bank’s announced funding cost that determines both the loan amount issued and the market interest rate, and the bank’s true funding cost that has a direct impact on retained earnings. We conclude that in a two-stage game both banks will announce the highest funding cost, thus reducing the amount of loans granted (in line with the regulator’s objective), but at the expense of a higher cost of borrowing established in the market. If the game is repeated, then both banks also choose lower loan amounts in the periods prior to the last one in which the declared funding cost is the lowest possible. It should be noted that the designated outcome also coincides with the findings of the Monetary Economic Department of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Added: May 3, 2012
Added: Jun 24, 2011