Славянство как проблема в текстах славянских и российских интеллектуалов XVII–XX вв.
The article examines the use of linguists terms Slavonicism, staroslavyanizm (word derived from Old Slavonic), tserkovnoslavyanizm (word derived from Church Slavonic) and related to them. The focus is on the term «tserkovnoslavyanizm», as it is particularly important in the study of Christian discourse of the modern Russian language. The author offers his definition of «tserkovnoslavyanizm» and justifies its examples.
In modern linguistics, a considerable number of works devoted to the study Slavonicisms ("tserkovnoslavyanizmy"). But most of these studies aimed at studying the stylistic features Slavonicisms in certain works of a particular author. The shift of interest towards the stylistic features Slavonicisms associated with relevant work G. Vinokur. Until now, however, it has not been given due attention to the issue of discursive, semantic typing Slavonicisms not been given the definition of the concept of 'tserkovnoslavyanizm' in its correlation with the modern Church Slavonic language. Also ignored were Slavonicisms function in non-fiction texts, church and theological spheres of functioning. Attempt typing Slavonicisms functioning in the modern Russian language on the basis of the body of research presented in the article "Functional types tserkovnoslavyanizmy in the modern Russian language."
The article considers the Views of L. N. Tolstoy not only as a representative, but also as a accomplisher of the Enlightenment. A comparison of his philosophy with the ideas of Spinoza and Diderot made it possible to clarify some aspects of the transition to the unique Tolstoy’s religious and philosophical doctrine. The comparison of General and specific features of the three philosophers was subjected to a special analysis. Special attention is paid to the way of thinking, the relation to science and the specifics of the worldview by Tolstoy and Diderot. An important aspect is researched the contradiction between the way of thinking and the way of life of the three philosophers.
Tolstoy's transition from rational perception of life to its religious and existential bases is shown. Tolstoy gradually moves away from the idea of a natural man to the idea of a man, who living the commandments of Christ. Starting from the educational worldview, Tolstoy ended by creation of religious and philosophical doctrine, which were relevant for the 20th century.
This important new book offers the first full-length interpretation of the thought of Martin Heidegger with respect to irony. In a radical reading of Heidegger's major works (from Being and Time through the ‘Rector's Address' and the ‘Letter on Humanism' to ‘The Origin of the Work of Art' and the Spiegel interview), Andrew Haas does not claim that Heidegger is simply being ironic. Rather he argues that Heidegger's writings make such an interpretation possible - perhaps even necessary.
Heidegger begins Being and Time with a quote from Plato, a thinker famous for his insistence upon Socratic irony. The Irony of Heidegger takes seriously the apparently curious decision to introduce the threat of irony even as philosophy begins in earnest to raise the question of the meaning of being. Through a detailed and thorough reading of Heidegger's major texts and the fundamental questions they raise, Haas reveals that one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century can be read with as much irony as earnestness. The Irony of Heidegger attempts to show that the essence of this irony lies in uncertainty, and that the entire project of onto-heno-chrono-phenomenology, therefore needs to be called into question.
The article is concerned with the notions of technology in essays of Ernst and Friedrich Georg Jünger. The special problem of the connection between technology and freedom is discussed in the broader context of the criticism of culture and technocracy discussion in the German intellectual history of the first half of the 20th century.