Конституционные основания осуществления нормоконтроля в гражданском процессе и предмет судебной деятельности
The paper argues that the constitutionally required is only a judicial compliance assessment. Analyzing the structural features of different models of judicial compliance assessment, the author proves the interconnection and interdependence of the constitutional provisions, the subject of judicial activity and the specific procedural rules of the contestation of normative legal acts. Explore the possibility of a judicial compliance assessment model, the author argues that the development of production rules on contestation of normative legal acts on the model of the right resolve the dispute fully corresponds with the constitutional guarantees of the right to judicial protection.
The subject of this article - is the research of public interest in Russian civil proceedings. The author compares the private interest and the public interest as well the public, state and society interest in law and draws conclusions about their similarities and differences. The article deals with the specific manifestation of public interest in civil proceeding (abstract and specific) and investigates problems of using this term in the text of the law and practice.
The article discusses the features of challenging legal acts and decisions of state authorities in accordance with the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. Unfortunately, many modern problems of administrative legal proceedings are historically predetermined by the peculiarities of Russian legislation, which were laid down during the Soviet period. Two years later, the established law enforcement practice of the CAS RF allows for an analysis and preliminary assessments of the main trends (trends) in the development of both legislation and the practice of administrative legal proceedings.
The article discusses the features of challenging legal acts and decisions of state authorities in accordance with the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation.The author explores the new requirements for evidence and proof. By analogy with the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the Code establishes that the named authorities, organizations and officials must prove the legality of the adopted normative acts, decisions, actions (inaction) of bodies, organizations and officials
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter