• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдено 16 публикаций
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Статья
Lukyanov F. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 474-485.

Twenty-five years have passed since the Cold War, but no stable international order has been created. The idea about a Western-centric unipolar world has failed, and a multipolar system is yet to emerge, though it’s hard to comment on how it may function properly.

Due to its size, geopolitical location, resource potential, great power tradition and aspirations Russia finds itself in the middle of the most important trends shaping the next world order. Global demand for a stable and balanced model is intertwined with Russia’s quest for its new international identity. Thus, re-assessment of the past quarter of a century is needed both internationally and nationally to pave a way to the future.

Добавлено: 10 декабря 2016
Статья
Karaganov S. A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 461-473.

The article discusses the results of Russian foreign policy since the collapse of the Soviet Union against the background of major new global and regional international trends and the policy of other major world powers. The author argues that Russia should work for preventing a new structured confrontation in Europe, maintaining international stability, and keeping the world from sliding into a big war which seems to be more likely now than ever before in the last 50 years. At the same time it should join forces with China, India, Iran and other major non-Western players in building a community of cooperation, development and security for Greater Eurasia, open to the world and serving as one of the pillars of its stable and peaceful development. The world is changing incredibly fast and precariously. Russia must occupy a leading place in this world by moving towards economic growth and playing a key role in preventing a new world war, supporting global strategic stability and building or rebuilding international cooperation and security structures for the decade to come.

Добавлено: 13 декабря 2016
Статья
Lukin A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 455-457.
Добавлено: 16 сентября 2018
Статья
Lukin A. Strategic Analysis. 2018. Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 134-153.
Добавлено: 25 августа 2018
Статья
Bordachev T. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6.

Кризисное состояние дел в отношениях ЕС-Россия -это окно возможностей для выстраивания новых принципов сотрудничества. Обе стороны могут наконец постараться учесть интересы и ценности друг друга и избавиться от балласта недопониманий и ошибочного восприятия. Будущее ЕС и России не в единстве, а в сосуществовании.

Добавлено: 7 декабря 2016
Статья
Grigoryev L. M. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 498-512.

The socio-economic history of Russia demonstrates that its ‘place’ in global economic relations has been subject to complex cyclical processes. The country entered the 20th century with a high growth rate and burgeoning industrialisation that included significant foreign capital. Historically exports primarily included raw materials such as grain and timber while imports consisted largely of machinery and consumer goods.The fast industrialisation and society changes involved large numbers of people in manufacturing, finally bringing success in many areas, especially education, nuclear and space studies, weaponry and health care. However, during the 20th century the general trend toward modernisation was interrupted by World War I, the Civil War, purges of the 1930s and World War II, which caused enormous loss to both the working population as a whole and, in particular, to its most creative members: the entrepreneurs and the intelligentsia. The collapse of the Soviet Union caused a further loss of industrial potential, a surge in emigration and the need to restructure socioeconomic institutions and launch a new wave of modernisation. At each such critical juncture, the country relied heavily on export of raw materials, struggled to restore human capital and defence capabilities, and was forced to import technologies and consumer goods, now and again as a century ago, while each time on a different level.

Добавлено: 13 декабря 2016
Статья
Skriba A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 604-618.
Добавлено: 18 октября 2016
Статья
Makarov I. A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 536-546.
Добавлено: 13 октября 2016
Статья
Lukin A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 573-589.
Добавлено: 11 ноября 2016
Статья
Krivushin I. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 524-535.
Добавлено: 27 ноября 2016
Статья
Lukin A. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 255-270.
Добавлено: 13 июня 2016
Статья
Bratersky M. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 513-523.

This article contributes to the rich body of literature on Russian security perceptions and analyses how Russian security thinking evolved over the last 20 years. The focus of the article is on how Russian security perspective shifted from the goal of assuring Russian security by integration and cooperation with the West to the idea of Russia’s own separate geo-economic project and the goal of reducing the country’s dependencies on the West. Security in this article is understood both as a military-political and as an economic phenomenon

Добавлено: 20 октября 2016
Статья
Lukin V. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 486-497.

This article examines the difficult search for identity in modern Russia amid debate over its future development. It explores practices in such countries as China and Germany, which have successfully adapted national identity to the need for modernisation and effective development in a new historical environment. The article analyses the risks that stem from Russia’s inclination towards focusing on the past and absolutising the factor of space. Finally, the piece offers suggestions on how to forge Russia’s new identity.

Добавлено: 13 декабря 2016
Статья
Entina E., Entin M. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40:6. P. 590-603.

Key ideas associated with Eurasianism were developed in the 19th century. The narrative of classical Eurasianism in the 1920s was developed to explain that Western civilisation was not superior to other civilisations. Eurasia is the middle continent between other parts of Europe and Asia. There are historical, geographical, and cultural impetuses here which push nations to different forms of association. However, the dissolution of the USSR gave birth to new ideologies and political theories of Eurasianism. The most positive one was extensively developed by the President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbaev. Today, we witness the fourth stage of the development of Eurasianism.

Добавлено: 19 октября 2016
Статья
Batyuk V. I. Strategic Analysis. 2017. Vol. 41. No. 5. P. 464-477.
Добавлено: 13 октября 2017
Статья
Suslov D. Strategic Analysis. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 6. P. 547-560.
Добавлено: 23 октября 2016