• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдено 9 публикаций
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Статья
Zakharov A., Carnoy M. International Journal of Educational Development. 2015. No. 43. P. 1-11.
Добавлено: 25 мая 2015
Статья
Zakharov A., Tsheko G., Carnoy M. International Journal of Educational Development. 2016. No. 50. P. 108-124.
Добавлено: 29 июля 2016
Статья
Diwan I., Vartanova I. International Journal of Educational Development. 2020. Vol. 78. P. 102249.

Do states manage to build education systems that produce students with political values they uphold? We test the indoctrination hypothesis using World Value Survey data spanning 96 countries. We devise an empirical strategy that can identify the effects of education on political values by using information about the political regime under which individuals live, and regimes under which they got educated. Our results suggest that state indoctrination is at work. For example, we find that higher education increases voting behavior by at least 45 percent more for cohorts that have studied in a democratic rather than an autocratic country.

Добавлено: 23 сентября 2020
Статья
Loyalka P., Zakharov A. International Journal of Educational Development. 2016. Vol. 49. P. 22-30.

В статье оценивается эффект теневого образования (обращения к услугам репетиторов и платных подготовительных курсов вне школы) на учебные достижения старшеклассников. На российских данных проведен анализ с использованием фиксированных эффектов. Согласно результатам анализа, теневое образование положительно влияет только на достижения учащихся, изначально показавших высокую успеваемость в школе, и не дает значимого эффекта для слабоуспевающих учеников. Делаются попытки объяснить полученные результаты. Гипотеза, что старшеклассники, использующие теневое образование, уменьшают свое участие в основных занятиях (напр., в выполнении домашних заданий), не нашла подтверждение в ходе анализа. Строится предположение, что слабоуспевающие ученики выбирают услуги теневого образования низкого качества, что, в конечном итоге, приводит к усилению неравного доступа в вузы.

Добавлено: 2 марта 2016
Статья
Morsy L., Khavenson T., Carnoy M. International Journal of Educational Development. 2018. Vol. 60. P. 60-79.
Добавлено: 11 ноября 2017
Статья
Smolentseva A. International Journal of Educational Development. 2020. Vol. 78. P. 102265.

The marketization of higher education in the 15 countries that were formally part of the USSR has established a system model that is distinctive within world higher education, the dual-track tuition system. The foundations of this model were established in the economic liberalization of late Soviet period which facilitated a common pattern in higher education across the post-Soviet countries. Although a private sector has been established, the primary mode of marketization has taken place within the public sector. This remains dominant but has been split into two heterogenous segments in terms of funding and student selection. National systems, and individual institutions, have become divided between state-subsidized higher scoring students, and fee-paying lower performing students, creating different valuations and behaviours for the two segments. National standardized testing is an important instrument of marketization, shaping student selection and institutional differentiation and legitimating the unequal social outcomes that result. Empirical comparison across the 15 countries demonstrates a high level of privatisation of costs, largely because of private funding within public sector. This system model, which is incoherent and fosters a large-scale commitment to non-excellence, reflects a larger duality within post-Soviet societies and polities which remains unresolved. Higher education is riven between the Soviet egalitarian legacy of higher education as a public good, and the post-Soviet moment of the late 1980s and 1990s in which policy shaped by Anglo-American neoliberal thinking set out to turn education into a consumer choice on the basis of an abstract formula of the ideal market.

Добавлено: 30 августа 2020
Статья
Prakhov I., Kotomina O., Sazhina A. International Journal of Educational Development. 2020. No. 78. P. 102252.
Добавлено: 24 августа 2020
Статья
Prakhov Ilya, Yudkevich M. M. International Journal of Educational Development. 2019. No. 65. P. 98-105.
Добавлено: 10 сентября 2017
Статья
Zakharov A., Carnoy M., Loyalka P. International Journal of Educational Development. 2014. No. 36. P. 13-21.
Добавлено: 4 марта 2014