• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдены 4 публикации
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Препринт
Yakovlev A. A., Freinkman L., Makarov S. et al. BOFIT Online. DP. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2017. No. 10.
Tight budget constraints confronting the Russian authorities since the 2008 crisis urge the federal government to adjust the traditional system of its relations with the regions. The paper presents the case of the Republic of Tatarstan (RT) to analyze potential regions’ response to the emerging, considerably harsher “rules of the game.” Our main conclusion is that Tatarstan and other stronger Russian regions can take advantage of the current crisis for transitioning to a new economic development model resembling developmental states in Southeast Asia. This conclusion draws on analysis of the strategies recently implemented by the RT elites in response to external shocks the republic had to cope with in the post-Soviet period. Special focus is on identifying key factors that helped the republic successfully tackle the previous shocks, such as effective mechanisms of aligning the interests of the main regional elite groups and forming a consensus regarding the republican developmental priorities and the instruments for their attainment. The actual prospects for the formation of a developmental state model in Tatarstan will depend upon the success of the current regional elite in finding a consolidated response to new challenges facing the republic in recent years, as well as the constructiveness of the federal policy towards the regions. One of specific obstacles for Tatarstan to follow on Asian experience of catching up relates to a need to accelerate opening up of the regional economy for new, domestic and foreign, players.
Добавлено: 28 декабря 2017
Препринт
Yakovlev A. A. BOFIT Online. DP. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2013. No. 7.
This article is based on the results of the projects “Collective actions of firms: compensation of state and market failures or rent seeking” and “Institutions and economic development: the role of bureaucracy and experiments as a method of reforms analysis and assessment”, which were conducted by HSE Institute for Industrial and Market Studies as part of the HSE Program of Fundamental Studies in 2012. The author is grateful to Vladimir Gimpelson, Evsei Gurvich, Yakov Pappe and Tseren Tserenov and to participants of the seminar at East China Normal University (Shanghai, December 2012) for their comments and suggestions
Добавлено: 15 ноября 2013
Препринт
Yakovlev A. A. BOFIT Online. DP. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2016. No. 2.
Добавлено: 28 января 2016
Препринт
Voskoboynikov I., Solanko L. BOFIT Online. DP. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition, 2014. No. 6.
Based on newly available data, we argue that multifactor productivity increases over the period 1995–2008 generated only about a half of Russia’s GDP growth, a smaller increase than most previous estimates. Further, growth in multifactor productivity seems to have contributed to a smaller share of GDP growth in 2003–2008 than in the first seven years of our observation period. These results imply that increases in capital inputs, and consequently investments in fixed capital, are more important than previously thought for Russia’s economic growth. Detailed analysis of industry-level data reveals two drivers of economic growth in the period: the extended oil & gas sector and high-skill-intensive services. Our analysis indicates that growth in the extended oil & gas sector reflected increased capital inputs, while growth in high-skill-intensive services seems to be part of catching up with more advanced markets. Neither sector is likely to spur growth in the coming decade.
Добавлено: 7 июня 2014