• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 76
Sort:
by name
by year
Working paper
Яковлев А. А., Казун А. П., Соболев А. С. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2014
In their most recent works, North and his co-authors (North, Wallis, Weingast, 2009) (North, Wallis, Webb, Weingast, 2012) name the formation of organizations capable of effectively restricting violence in society as a necessary condition for transfer from developing societies to sustainable economic growth societies. However, the mechanisms of emergence and conditions for the operation of such organizations in contemporary developing countries remain unclear. We shall follow the logic of formation of such organizations using the case study of collective actions of the Russian business community aimed at restricting “state violence” against business. We shall try to identify the conditions leading to a shift in the choice of strategies from attempts of informal agreements with extorters controlling means of coercion to cooperation of businessmen and trace further evolution of organized forms of collective actions. Finally, we shall assess to what extent the created organizations can be effi cient and self-supporting in the long term.
Added: Apr 19, 2014
Working paper
Шадрин А. Е., Беляев А. Н. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2005. № 01.
In accord with discussions about the ways of rise competitiveness this paper analyses the experience of state assistance policy in the competitive ability of the other countries’ economy. The suggestions according its practical application under conditions of Russia are also discussed in this paper.
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Working paper
Радаев В. В. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2001. № 01.
Added: Mar 14, 2013
Working paper
Баталина М. Л., Московская А. А., Тарадина Л. Д. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2008. № 02.
Added: Apr 2, 2013
Working paper
Данилов Ю. А. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2003. № 05.
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Working paper
Голикова В. В. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2009. № 01.
Added: Apr 2, 2013
Working paper
Бакли Ной, Гарифуллина Г. А., Рейтер О. Дж. и др. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2013
Added: Aug 16, 2013
Working paper
Борисова Е. И. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2013. № 5.
The paper analyses homeowners associations (HOAs) in Russia. Systematization of the 20 years’ reform trends is given, several periods with different patterns of HOA formation are proposed. Special attention is devoted to the numerous problems that HOAs experience. Among them are immature tenants, legislative obstacles and monopolization and state capture of the vital for HOA life markets.
Added: Jan 31, 2014
Working paper
Маркес Второй И., Яковлев А. А. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2017. № WP1/2017/04.
Added: Jan 18, 2018
Working paper
Яковлев А. А., Казун А. П., Ситкевич Д. А. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2016
Added: Jun 3, 2016
Working paper
Долгопятова Т. Г. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. № 06.
Added: Dec 15, 2012
Working paper
Chepurenko A., Gabelko M., Obraztsova O. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2011. No. 04.

The paper argues that when developing an explanatory model of the early-stage entrepreneurial activity level (measured by total index of early entrepreneurial activity - TEA) one should consider the ‘path dependency’ of the ‘institutional matrix’ of different societies. Otherwise one could wonder why some theoretical models of TEA determining factors, as provided by a lot of studies, are not statistically significant for younger market systems and entrepreneurship in transitional economies. However, comparing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data with the scope of official statistics provides a deeper insight into adults’ intrinsic incentives to become entrepreneurial. A statistical analysis
of national TEA levels does not support the thesis that TEA levels, and structure, change under economic slowdown. Therefore, it seems logical to suggest that to interpret the TEA level it is important to examine some fundamental specific of different types of national markets rather than just the actual economic situation itself. When testing this hypothesis, the authors compared the characteristics of GEM countries with stable, high or low TEA levels. A Fisher’s linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) is used to examine whether different groups of countries can be distinguished by linear combinations of predictor variables and to determine which variables are responsible for this separation. The FLDA model explains the parabolic form of the relation between the level of economic development and TEA. A database of independent variables includes some different quantitative, ordinal and nominal variables determining the context of the national capital accumulation history. Using FLDA, we argue, one might foresee future tendencies of TEA - not only for GEM participating countries.

Added: Dec 26, 2012
Working paper
Авдашева С. Б., Руденский П. О. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2002. № 01.
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Working paper
Маркес Второй И. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2017. № WP1/2017/05.
Added: Jan 18, 2018
Working paper
Шкаратан О. И. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2006. № 03.
The key problem of the social situation in post-Soviet Russia implies that its future and the prospects of developing new efficient post-industrial economy to a large extent depend on the successful creation of the new middle classes, the very foundation of which is composed of professionals and managers. A considerable proportion of these social occupational groups is facing a difficult situation, which can be described by the inability for accumulative reproduction of human capital and the lack of innovative activity. The nature of transitional processes in Russia has led to a stable reproduction of socially unwelcome (and even illegal) behavior models of those groups, which were accepted as the only possible way of adaptation to a normative social structure, where the mechanisms of social protection were scarce. In this research the primary attention is drawn to analysis of socioeconomic situation, accumulation of human capital, social and occupational status dynamics, and the state of social protection of professionals and managers. Its empirical base along with the data collected from statistical sources and legal documents includes series of representative surveys of Russian population, held in January 1994 and November 2002 under the author’s guidance, as well as the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey database (RLMS 2004). We also relied on information from a number of in-depth interviews with the experts (representatives of federal and regional authorities, owners and executives of firms and organizations) and the representatives of managers and professionals (2004—2005).
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Working paper
Иванов И. М., Шкаратан О. И. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2005. № 1.
Added: Nov 13, 2012
Working paper
Долгопятова Т. Г. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2002. № 03.
Added: Apr 1, 2013
Working paper
Спиридонова О. И. Институциональные проблемы российской экономики. WP1. НИУ ВШЭ, 2010. № 03.
Added: Apr 2, 2013