Конституционное Собрание Российской Федерации как орган, обладающий государственно-властными полномочиями
Гришина Т. А., Каргин К. В.
Конституция России и развитие законодательства: сборник материалов межвузовской научно-практической конференции
Н. Новгород: Нижегородская правовая академия, 2011.
Анализ эффективности управления бюджетными процессами в интеграционных объединениях на примере Европейского союза
Зайцев Ю. К. Саарбрюкен: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011.
Added: Sep 14, 2012
Козлов А. В. В кн.: Конституционно-правовые проблемы уголовного права и процесса: сборник материалов международной научной конференции. Санкт-Петербург, 30-31 октября 2009 г.. СПб.: Петрополис, 2010. С. 171-176.
Added: Jul 23, 2012
Голощапов А. М. Вопросы правоведения. 2012. № 2. С. 98-110.
Added: Sep 10, 2012
Орловский Ю. П., Кузнецов Д. Л., Черняева Д. В. Проблемы рынка труда. WP3. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. № WP3/2013/09.
This research is aimed at analyzing the prospects of the Russian minimum wage legislation reform from an international legislative perspective. Authors study historical aspects of conceptual development in the field worldwide, examine the “minimum wage” concept definitions suggested in international treaties and legislative sources of various countries from a comparative viewpoint, suggest a methodology of the minimum wage setting procedures and systemize relevant mechanisms of enforcement. A policy of abstention from the minimum wage setting on the national level has also been studied and the compensatory instruments have been singled out and described. On the basis of the results of this research major trends in the minimum wage regulations in contemporary world have been outlined. A study of the pressing problems of the minimum wage legal regulation in the Russian Federation and of the suggestions for its further development are given in a separate section of this paper.
Added: Nov 1, 2013
Зайцев Ю. К. Саарбрюкен: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
Added: May 28, 2012
Миронюк М. Г., Сыроежкин К. Л. В кн.: Политические системы современных государств. Т. 2: Азия. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2012. С. 509-525.
Added: Oct 10, 2012
Гимпельсон В. Е. Экономическая социология. 2010. Т. 11. № 4. С. 24-68.
Added: Aug 31, 2012
Antonov M. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2013. No. WP BRP 24/LAW/2013.
This paper examines the correlation between the concepts of sovereignty, human rights, and democracy in Russian legal and political debate, analyzing this correlation in the context of Russian philosophical discourse. It argues that sovereignty is often used as a powerful argument which allows the overruling of international humanitarian standards and the formal constitutional guarantees of human rights. This conflict between sovereignty and human rights also recurs in other countries, and many legal scholars demand the revision or even abandonment of the concept of sovereignty. In Russia this conflict is aggravated by some characteristic features of the traditional mentality which frequently favors statism and collective interests over individual ones, and by the state building a “power vertical” subordinating regional and other particularistic interests to the central power. These features and policies are studied in the context of the Slavophile-Westernizer philosophical divide. This divide reveals the pros and contras put forward by the Russian supporters of the isolationist (conservative) policy throughout contemporary history, and especially in the sovereignty debates in recent years. The Russian Constitution contains many declaratory statements about human rights and democracy, but their formulations are vague and have little concrete effect in court battles where the application of international humanitarian law is counterbalanced by the concerns of the protection of sovereignty. These concerns coincide with isolationist and authoritarian policies, which led in 2006 to their amalgamation into the concept of “sovereign democracy.” This concept is considered in this paper to be a recurrence of the Russian conservative tradition. Even though the concept in its literal meaning has been abandoned by its author and supporters, most of its ideas are still on the cusp of the official political discourse which reproduces the pivotal axes of the Russian political philosophy of the 19th century.
Added: Sep 18, 2013
Postylyakov S. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2015. No. WP BRP 55/LAW/2015.
The article deals with relevant problems of determination of the objective limits of the prejudgment using the prejudgment of the particular types of court rulings as an example. The author concludes that the concept of «circumstances» should be defined as facts and established on their basis legal relations. The author considers that the court orders, the judgments in absentia, the judgments of dismissal due to the approval of the settlement as well as the higher court rulings that verify legality of previous judgments not verifying validity should be excluded from the objective limits of the prejudgment. The author analyzes rules of the draft of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 2000 and comes to the conclusion that Article 61 of the current Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation requires to be amended
Added: Oct 8, 2015
Семин В. Г. В кн.: Инновации на основе информационных и коммуникационных технологий. Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции (2010). М.: МИЭМ, 2010. С. 601-602.
Added: Apr 27, 2012
Воронин А. С., Усов И. В. Проблемы национальной стратегии. 2011. № 2. С. 49-69.
Added: Oct 25, 2012