Book chapter
Стихотворение Николая Гумилева "Андрей Рублев" как исследовательская проблема
С. 200-211.
Article about the poem by Nikolai Gumilev "Andrei Rublev"
Article about the poem by Nikolai Gumilev "Andrei Rublev"
The article investigates the reception of asmeists in the russian provintial periodics of 1910-s.
Interpretation of Gumilev's famous poem
A guide to the book of memoirs by Irina Odoevtseva "On the banks of the Neva"
The dissertation investigates the evolution of N. Gumilev's estimations of the main russian symbolists: V. Bryusov, F. Sologub, A. Belyj, Vyach. Ivanov, A. Blok.
The article investigates the first review by N. Gumilev on the Vyach. Ivanov’s poetry (first chapter of the book of poems “Cor Ardens”) in context of another modernists reviews (by V. Bryusov, A. Bely, A. Blok and I. Annensky). The article identifies thematic dominants, which are common to all critics (including Gumilev), according to which was forming the representation of Vyach. Ivanov the literary sphere of the late 1900s and early 1910s.
Notes of a Cavalryman (Zapiski kavalerista, 1915–1916) by Nikolai Gumilev are dedicated to the poet’s participation in World War I and reveal a deep influence of Tolstoy’s novel War and Peace. A brief analysis of the work leads to the conclusion that Gumilev on a superficial level often argued with Tolstoy’s concept of war. Nevertheless, on a deeper level he took cues from Nikolai Rostov not only by getting in the same situations as Tolstoy’s hero, but also by resembling Rostov’s psychological type. This consequently allows us to claim that during World War I, Nikolai Rostov was a model according to which Gumilev fashioned his own life.
"Semiotics of Scandal" is the third collection of the series "Mechanisms of culture". It presents the materials of an international conference held at the Center for Slavic studies (Sorbonne, Paris). The authors, using different methodologies, analyze different forms of scandal as one of the dominant categories of the literary process, history, and politics.
The article investigates N. Gumilev's attitude to A. Belyj.