• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 1 601
Sort:
by name
by year
Book
Никитенко Е. Л. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2019.
Added: Oct 30, 2019
Book
Edited by: А. К. Болотова Вып. 2. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Book
Ясин Е. Г. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 2002.
Added: Feb 10, 2012
Book
Абашкин В. Л., Голанд М. Ю., Гохберг Л. М. и др. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2013.
Added: Jul 24, 2013
Book
Давидсон А. Б. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2017.
The Cape of Good Hope used to be called “The Tavern of the Seas”, a waypointon the route followed by ships from Europe to the Far East. For Russian ships it was a route from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok and Russian America. Why would South Africa attract us now a days? Why is it important to know what is going on in this faroff land? The author lived there for several years in the 1990s. At that time South Africa was going through a turning point in its history, and he tried to understand the meaning of this country’s experience for the rest of the world.
The book is intended for historians, political scientists, specialists in cultural studies, graduate and undergraduate students as well as those interested in the history of South Africa.
Added: Jan 30, 2017
Book
Давидсон А. Б. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2015.
Added: Apr 10, 2015
Book
Теплова Т. В. М.: Издательский дом ГУ-ВШЭ, 1998.
Added: Feb 10, 2012
Book
Усоскин В. М., Белоусова В. Ю. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012.
Added: Jul 7, 2015
Book
Крауч К. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2020.
Added: Jun 11, 2020
Book
Азов А. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2013.

The book considers events from the history of early Soviet translation studies. It discusses how the approach to the foreign text and the translator’s role and responsibilities were changing in theoretical and critical publications on translation during the period from the 1920s to the 1950s and 1960s. Translation concepts studied by the authors include both concepts which permitted (or even required) the translation to preserve the originality and stylistic freshness of a foreign work, and those which only acknowledged translations that had adjusted the foreign work to readers’ literary tastes and views. The authors demonstrate how, using critical articles and armed with an accumulation of theoretical models, translators engaged in a serious struggle with each other.

 

The story is illustrated with a detailed history of a conflict between I. A. Kashkin, who suggested the theory of realistic translation, and advocates of other views on translation, E. L. Lann and G. A. Shengeli. The polemics between Kashkin, Lann, and Shengeli in the 1950s are cited in the book, and some of the papers are published for the first time.

 

The book is intended for researchers studying translation, the history of literary criticism, and anyone interested in the history of Russian translation.

 

Added: Apr 28, 2014
Book
Кларк Б. Р. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2011.
Added: Nov 1, 2011
Book
Романова В. В., Мацкевич А. В. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012.
Added: Oct 24, 2012
Book
Юдкевич М. М., Воскобойников О. С., Иванова Ю. В. и др. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2013.
Added: Sep 17, 2013
Book
Юдкевич М. М., Иванова Ю. В., Борусяк Л. Ф. и др. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2013.
Added: Dec 9, 2013
Book
Edited by: П. В. Соколов, Ю. В. Иванова М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2012.

This monograph covers studies that aim to reconstruct the contextual history of argumentative practices in various areas of intellectual culture in Western European antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Early Modern period, including theological thought, science, scholastic philosophy, and humanistic literature. The authors discuss topics that are important for understanding European intellectual culture such as the argumentative structure of philosophical, scientific, and theological writings; communication modalities of philosophical and scientific knowledge; and genre-specific and logical-semantic features of philosophical and scientific polemics. The history of philosophical and scientific thought is presented as a series of transformations in philosophical and scientific argumentation, and as a history of the invention of new arguments and the recurrence of polemical practices. In their reconstruction of the historical and philosophical process, the authors seek to take into account multiple extra-theoretical factors (social, political, and institutional) influencing the development of philosophy and science. Concepts, theses, and ideas are analyzed in the context of their usage in the dominant forms of intellectual culture.

Added: Oct 15, 2012