Book
Юридическая техника. Ежегодник
Ч. 1. Вып. 7: Третьи Бабаевские чтения "Юридическая аргументация: теория, практика, техника". Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2013.
Editor-in-chief:
В. М. Баранов
Under the general editorship:
М. В. Баранова
Chapters
Панченко П. Н. В кн.: Юридическая техника. Ежегодник. Ч. 1. Вып. 7: Третьи Бабаевские чтения "Юридическая аргументация: теория, практика, техника". Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2013. С. 36-47.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Keywords:
юридическая техника
Similar publications
Тенилова Т. Л. Юридическая техника. 2009. № 3. С. 309-316.
Added: Dec 12, 2012
Borisova T. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 05.
The article describes and analyzes the legislative politics of revolutionary regimes in Russia in 1917-1918. The author aims to demonstrate the political meaning of the form of early Soviet legislation and its legitimizing effect. The revolutionary legislators often used specific language in the new laws as a vehicle of legitimacy, i.e. to make the people comply. The two main types of legal language used by the Bolsheviks can be interpreted from the perspective of different types of legitimacy. The revolutionary strategy used propagandistic legislation, written in the language of lay people, which urged them to act according to the new law. It can be seen as a request for acts of the people to legitimize the soviets. On the contrary, the traditional strategy employed old bureaucratic means of writing and distributing legislation to the local soviets. The language used by this strategy was closed to the understanding of a lay audience and implied traditions of obeying the law written in familiar legal language, which in turn implied rational/legal legitimacy. The second strategy had already become dominant after the first months of the Bolshevik revolution. This observation demonstrates that from the very beginning of their rule, Soviet leaders approached legislative policy from a technocratic point of view, which determined the further development of Soviet legal theory and practice.
Added: Jul 20, 2012
Исаков В. Б. В кн.: Право на доступ к информации: возможности и ограничения в электронной среде: сборник материалов международной научно-практической конференции. Вып. 2. СПб.: Президентская библиотека имени Б.Н. Ельцина, 2012. С. 57-77.
Added: Feb 26, 2013
СПб.: СПбИВЭСЭП, 2013.
This collector contains international conference papers on legal theories. Papaers are related to a problem of symbolic and attributive entity of law. This problem is tried to solve in perspectives of legal phylosophy, history, techniques as well as in perspective of different branches of law.
Collected papers may be of law researchers, teachers, postgraduates and students interest.
Added: Jan 13, 2014
Вып. 6: Техника современного правотворчества: состояние, проблемы, модернизация. Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2012.
Added: Oct 30, 2012
Borisova T. Y. In bk.: From the Judge's Arbitrium to the Legality Principle: Legislation as a Source of Law in Criminal Trial. Iss. 31. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2013. P. 295-315.
The article describes and analizes the issue of access to all potential legal sources in late imperial Russia as an important component of legality principle. The author investigates how local features of political and administrative culture and legal professionalism determined the specific practical application of this principle.
Added: Feb 19, 2014
Маркунцов С. А. Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2016. № 4. С. 31-42.
In the beginning of the article analyzes the trend of increasing in the Сriminal code of the Russian Federation the number of criminal law prohibitions, constructed using administrative prejudice. Currently in the Special part of the Сriminal code of the Russian Federation contains nine articles that contain such prohibitions. It is noted that all introduced criminal law prohibitions with administrative prejudice different in its design features. With the implementation of some of them in law enforcement practice, serious difficulties arise. It is concluded that the use of administrative prejudice in the design of criminal law prohibitions should be scientifically substantiated. At the same time along with the practical problems of application of the relevant criminal law prohibitions, there is a problem in the understanding of administrative prejudice. In the doctrine of criminal law, some scholars in determining administrative prejudice trying to do exclusively concepts of criminal law (sectoral) concepts, others scholars are using mostly theoretical constructs. Defining administrative prejudice, the scientists also different emphases in the understanding of its legal nature and essence: in the main, see it as a phenomenon exclusively of law enforcement practice, or primarily as a phenomenon of legal (legislative) techniques. Administrative prejudice is determined by the concept of "prejudicially (legal) relationship", "specified relationship", "part of the process of proof", "legal rule", "a special way of verification of the facts", "legal" elements of crimes", "the reception of legal technique", etc. According to the author's best is a consideration of this legal phenomenon as a special means of legal techniques along with the legal axioms, presumptions and fictions. This understanding of administrative prejudice reflects its specificity in a narrow sectoral sense, however, it is a legal phenomenon can be defined in a broader sense, reflecting primarily its cross-sectoral nature of the position legal (criminal) policy. From the position of the approach the scholars point out that administrative prejudice is a "special relationship of criminal and administrative law", "means of criminalization and decriminalization", "means of prevention of crimes", "means of combating criminality", etc.
Added: Feb 25, 2017
Edited by: В. М. Баранов Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2012.
Added: Oct 22, 2012
"10.07.27 Философские проблемы государства и права
10.07.31 Социология права
10.07.61 Теория права
10.09.91 История государства и права отдельных стран
"
Added: Nov 17, 2012
Грачева Ю. В., Князева Е. А. В кн.: Правовые науки в XXI веке: стратегические направления развития [Текст]: Международный сборник научных трудов.. Вып. 5. Владимир: Финансовый университет при Правительстве РФ, 2015. С. 46-54.
Added: Feb 23, 2016
Mayanskiy E. arxiv.org. math. Cornell University, 2013. No. 5150.
We list all finite abelian groups which act effectively on smooth cubic fourfolds.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Edited by: В. М. Баранов, П. Н. Панченко, А. В. Козлов Т. 1. Н. Новгород: Нижегородский филиал НИУ ВШЭ, 2009.
Added: May 24, 2012
Лукьянова Е. А. Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2007. № 15. С. 4-9.
Added: Nov 19, 2013
Edited by: П. Н. Панченко, А. В. Козлов Т. 1. Н. Новгород: ООО "Стимул-СТ", 2010.
Added: May 24, 2012
Totyev K. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2014
This article is devoted to the legitimation and application of the standards of ex post and ex ante by courts and the executive authorities in the sphere of competition regulation. The postulates of ex post and ex ante are considered as legal principles. The principle of ex post is intended solely for judicial and administrative application; it has a deontological framework; it assumes that the legality of the activity of economic entities is assessed only on the basis of positive legal criteria in terms of the subjective rights violated; it is limited to a particular case. The traditional approach to the principle of ex post limits the scope of its application on the subjects and excessively expands its objects. The postulate of ex ante has a utilitarian basis which assumes the assessment of the application of relevant rules in the future. One of the main aims of the article is to refute the common view of lawyers and economists that a legislator applies principle of ex ante not being bound by principle of ex post, while it is the other way around for the courts and the executive authorities. The principle of ex ante may be applied not only in the process of the creation of new rules but also at the application stage for existing rules on economic competition. This is justified because the arguments of the courts and the executive authorities about a refusal to take into account the consequences of a decision in a particular case are not convincing.
Added: Apr 17, 2014
Edited by: В. М. Баранов, Д. Краснов Н. Новгород: Нижегородская академия МВД России, 2009.
Added: May 24, 2012
Edited by: В. А. Лабузов Оренбург: Оренбургский государственный институт менеджмента, 2011.
Added: Apr 16, 2012
Edited by: С. А. Боголюбов, Н. И. Хлуденева М.: Юстицинформ, 2011.
Added: Apr 16, 2012
Храмова Т. М. Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2012. № 7. С. 10-16.
The article is devoted to a particular form of freedom of assembly — the right to counter-demonstrate. The author underlines the value of this right as an element of democratic society, but also acknowledges the risk of violent actions among participants of opposing demonstrations. Due to this risk, the government may adopt adequate measures restricting the right to counter-demonstrate, certain types of which are analyzed in this paper.
Added: Jan 10, 2013
Borisova T. Y. Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2012. No. 04.
This article analyzes the usage of legislation as a legal source in the Russian Empire through the phenomenon of the publication of law. The author argues that the absence of separation of executive, legislative and court powers had definite negative effects for lawmaking and enforcement. The legislative politics of Russian emperors could be analyzed using Jürgen Habermas‘ concept of ―representative publicness‖ (representative öffentlichkeit): to a large extent, the tsars considered law as both an assertion of authority and a means of governing. Their actions towards strengthening legality in the state (i.e. the compulsory publication of legislation) were in essence symbolic or theatrical. In fact, since the separation of laws from executive acts did not exist in imperial Russia, the legislation was published (or stayed unpublished) exclusively for state administrators. The conflict in conceptions of legality between state and civil actors in the second half of the nineteenth century was not of a merely political nature. The article demonstrates that there was a public demand for publication of legislation; insufficient accessibility of legal information negatively influenced social and economic development in imperial Russia.
Added: Jul 20, 2012
Белый А. В. ЭКО. 2010. № 6. С. 97-114.
Development of standards of international controllability is reviewed in the article. Institutional approach is applied to development of international legal regime of Energy Charter. Definition of controllability is connected to development of international standards of dispute settlement, which are described in the article in detail. In connection with controllability, Russian interest, defense of investment in European Union and ecological investment encouragement, is reviewed in the article.
мировое управление и управляемость, Мировая экономика, международное экономическое право, энергетическая хартия, International control and controllability, International economics, international economic law, Energy Charter
Added: Oct 4, 2012
Гетьман-Павлова И. В. Государство и право. 2010. № 6. С. 84-92.
международное частное право; недвижимость; ; школа бартолистов; бартолисты; теория статутов; статуарная теория/
Added: Oct 1, 2012