• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 386
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Головко Л., Резник Г. М., Халиулин А. Закон. 2013. № 5. С. 57-63.
Added: Jul 11, 2013
Article
Степанов Д. И. Закон. 2014. № 7. С. 31-55.
Added: Oct 20, 2016
Article
Степанов Д. И. Закон. 2015. № 9. С. 110-128.
Added: Oct 21, 2016
Article
Власова А. С., Удалова Н. М. Закон. 2016. № 6. С. 111-120.

The paper is devoted to the notion of "nominee director", which is widely used by Russian tax authorities and courts in tax cases. This notion has neither legal definition nor special criteria to avow the person as a nominee director. However, the use of it may entail legal consequences rot both: the nominally controlled legal entity, headed by a nominee director, and its counterparties. The authors conclude that the use of the term "nominee directir" in its current interpretation directly contradicts the public nature of tax relations. 

Added: Jan 23, 2017
Article
Саламатина И. В., Смольников Д. И. Закон. 2018. № 3. С. 37-44.

Over the past few years, Russia and some other countries have been taking steps to reduce the number of regulations for businesses. Through comparative analysis the authors come to the conclusion that efforts at deregulation are feeble because of fragmentation. They also emphasise the impor- tance of continuous and consistent codification of existing regulations.

Added: Jan 23, 2019
Article
Орловский Ю. П. Закон. 2019. № 11. С. 39-46.

This article considers main additions and amendments to the Labour Code of the Russian Federation following its adoption, and analyses general aspects of labour legislation such as the notion of labour legislation, sources and principles of legal regulation of labour relations, legal institutions, remote workers and small business employees.

Added: Dec 5, 2019
Article
Вишневский А. А. Закон. 2019. № 12. С. 96-104.

This article attempts to take a non-conventional view on the banking system. The author considers the conventional view to be insufficient as the banking system is seen as a combination of banks and regulators but banks and regulators alone are unable to create any banking activity without the client the is usually “out of picture” of the banking system. The author’s approach is that the “initial state” of the banking system is non-contradictory, its elements are not in opposition to each other under the umbrella of legislative attempts to create an artificial balance between them, but rather they are in cooperation with each other. The author insists that this type of banking system is supposed to be the strategic goal of banking regulation, which so far is limited to a chain of sophisticated responses to crises. To achieve this goal the scholars are supposed to concentrate on a multidisciplinary approach.

Added: Jun 26, 2020
Article
Ренц И. Г., Ярков В. В., Брановицкий К. Л. Закон. 2020. № 1. С. 69-84.

This article considers from a comparative legal point of view the issue of ensuring the uniformity of judicial practice, as well as the relation of the uniformity of judicial practice to the principle of independence of judges, which is relevant in any legal order. It offers general characteristics of the existing German and French models of ensuring the uniformity of judicial practice and suggests improvements in the domestic legal order. One of the key points of foreign experience is not so much about conciliation or overly formal procedures for reconciling differences / deviations in judicial practice through conciliation bodies, but it consists in an effective mechanism for detecting problematic issues and initiating an open discussion of the need to change / maintain judicial practice (in Germany, even with the possible participation of the parties). Such open discussions in the development of uniform approaches to the most complex, important and / or new legal issues along with open discussions involving representatives of the academia and professional community could undoubtedly increase the effectiveness of the existing mechanism in the domestic legal order.

Added: Oct 29, 2020
Article
Галкова Е. В. Закон. 2016. № 11. С. 173-186.
Added: Sep 28, 2016
Article
Дьяченко Е. Б., Энтин К. В. Закон. 2019. № 3. С. 98-119.

The article contains an analysis of the main legal findings of the EAEU Court in 2017–2018. The case-law of the EAEU Court is analysed examined from several perspectivesangles: its influence on the application of EAEU law in the Union and the Member-States and from a comparative perspective taking EU law and the case-law of the CJEU as a point of reference. The Court’s judgments and advisory opinions addressed various issues pertaining to competition law, customs regulation, free movement of goods and workers, labour relations with the EAEU bodies’ employees and officials. Most notably, the Court has formulated the essential properties characteristics of EAEU law and provided a definition for the types of policies implemented by the Union. The establishment by the Court of the properties characteristics of EAEU law — such as primacy, direct effect and direct applicability — constitutes, according to the authors, a necessary precondition for its effective development and application, and paves the way for its use to protect the individuals’ rights and legitimate interests in the national legal systems.The article contains an analysis of the main legal findings of the EAEU Court in 2017–2018. The case-law of the EAEU Court is analysed examined from several perspectivesangles: its influence on the application of EAEU law in the Union and the Member-States and from a comparative perspective taking EU law and the case-law of the CJEU as a point of reference. The Court’s judgments and advisory opinions addressed various issues pertaining to competition law, customs regulation, free movement of goods and workers, labour relations with the EAEU bodies’ employees and officials. Most notably, the Court has formulated the essential properties characteristics of EAEU law and provided a definition for the types of policies implemented by the Union. The establishment by the Court of the properties characteristics of EAEU law — such as primacy, direct effect and direct applicability — constitutes, according to the authors, a necessary precondition for its effective development and application, and paves the way for its use to protect the individuals’ rights and legitimate interests in the national legal systems.

Added: Mar 1, 2019
Article
Медушевский А. Н. Закон. 2020. № 3. С. 28-29.
Added: Dec 25, 2020
Article
Бормашева К. А., Новоселова Л. А., Янковский Р. М. и др. Закон. 2020. № 12. С. 17-28.
Added: Dec 23, 2020
Article
Плешков Д. В. Закон. 2011. № 1. С. 137-140.
Added: Mar 17, 2011