• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 467
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Мясников С. А., Ротмистров А. Н. Социологические исследования. 2014. № 5. С. 131-135.

This article presents the results of theoretical and empirical study of political paternalism expressing among Moscow students. This study is based on concepts and methodology of a number of related branches of scientific knowledge: political science, sociology, social psychology. Purposes of our study: to make a review of studies of political paternalism in Russia, to formulate an operational concept of political paternalism, to develop a technique for measuring expressing ofMoscow students’ paternalist attitude in its political slice,to describe thisexpressing, including classifiing students according to the quality and intensity of their expressingof political paternalism.

Added: Sep 26, 2013
Article
Мясников С. А., Ротмистров А. Н. Социологические исследования. 2014. № 5. С. 131-135.

This article presents the results of theoretical and empirical study of political paternalism expressing among Moscow students. This study is based on concepts and methodology of a number of related branches of scientific knowledge: political science, sociology, social psychology. Purposes of our study: to make a review of studies of political paternalism in Russia, to formulate an operational concept of political paternalism, to develop a technique for measuring expressing ofMoscow students’ paternalist attitude in its political slice,to describe 2 thisexpressing, including classifiing students according to the quality and intensity of their expressingof political paternalism.

Added: Nov 9, 2017
Article
Покровский Н. Е. Социологические исследования. 1993. № 6. С. 20-30.
Added: Oct 16, 2013
Article
Покровский Н. Е., Нефедова Т. Г. Социологические исследования. 2013. № 4. С. 13-23.
Added: May 25, 2013
Article
Карачаровский В. В., Шкаратан О. И. Социологические исследования. 2020. Т. 46. № 3. С. 27-39.
Added: Apr 23, 2020
Article
Толстова Ю. Н. Социологические исследования. 2004. № 9. С. 12-14.
Added: Nov 26, 2010
Article
Силаева В. Л. Социологические исследования. 2012. № 10. С. 111-122.
Added: Sep 26, 2013
Article
Гофман А. Б. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 2. С. 148-148.
Added: Oct 16, 2013
Article
Покровский Н. Е. Социологические исследования. 2007. № 1. С. 17-21.
Added: Oct 16, 2013
Article
Балабанова Е. С., Бедный А. Б., Грудзинский А. О. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 4. С. 69-78.
Added: Dec 13, 2011
Article
Гофман А. Б. Социологические исследования. 2015. № 11. С. 29-36.
Different conceptual aspects of social unity and their interrelations are discussed.
Added: Nov 25, 2016
Article
Савинская О. Б., Истомина А. Г., Ларкина Т. Ю. и др. Социологические исследования. 2016. № 8. С. 21-29.
Added: Nov 23, 2015
Article
Сафонова М. А. Социологические исследования. 2012. Т. 337. № 5. С. 106-117.
Added: Aug 30, 2012
Article
Чернова Ж. В. Социологические исследования. 2003. № 2. С. 97-104.
Added: Dec 29, 2010
Article
Нисневич Ю. А. Социологические исследования. 2016. № 5. С. 61-68.

The paper is devoted to instrumental conceptualization of corruption, including classification of its forms and definition of the institutional mechanism. It proposes an analysis of conceptual approaches to corruption and demonstrates that the major aspects of normative approach are as follows: value judgment of corruption as an unambiguously negative phenomenon; associating corruption with contempt of the law or violation of moral and ethical standards; consideration of corruption as a deviant behavior. The author emphasizes challenging issues and ambiguity of this approach. The rationalist approach to corruption, including the economic approach, does not address value judgments or various norms and standards, but describes it in terms of functional assessment of its symptoms and consequences. The paper counters the claim that corruption fulfils some positive functions such as the function of deregulation and overcoming bureaucratic barriers. The paper reveals a generalized mechanism of corruption: exceeding authority and violating the official powers and duties regulations, including code of conduct and ethical standards, and (or) social behavioral, moral, and ethical norms, an official of an administrative organization illegitimately distributes and uses resources of the organization to gain personal or group benefits, not to implement the functions and objectives of the organization. The author proposes a new definition of the term “political corruption” and describes an hierarchy system of types of political and economic corruption, where the “state capture” is at the top. The author also determinates the institutional mechanism of corruption in the sphere of public power, the essence of which lies in the various types of abuse of its resources. While conceptualizing corruption in public policy in an instrumental way, it is defined as an abuse, misuse of public power resources by a public official not for implementing functions of the state or providing social progress, but for obtaining undue preferences or deriving tangible or intangible personal or group benefits, including gaining advantages in favor of third parties.

Added: Jun 9, 2016
Article
Сабирова Г. А., Лукьянова Е. Л. Социологические исследования. 2012. № 5. С. 79-88.
Added: Dec 7, 2012
Article
Малинкин А. Н. Социологические исследования. 2014. С. 76-85.
Added: Mar 16, 2015
Article
Черных А. И. Социологические исследования. 1993. № 8.
Added: Mar 27, 2012