The article delivers an analysis of German text by the Russian philosopher and classical philologist A.F.Losev (1893–1988) published below which contains four annotations of his earlier works. The author discusses the question of it's dating and shows that the annotations present brief summaries of Losev's treatises which have been later partially used as material for his published books. The treatise “General aesthetics from the dialectical viewpoint” has given materials for two books “The dialectics of the artistic form” (1927) and “Music as an object of logic” (1927), the study “The theory of number in the ancient Greek philosophy” has been published in parts as two studies “Dialectics of number in Plotinus” (1928) and “Aristotle's critique of Platonism (1928), the three-volume “Philosophy of name' has been shortened up to the published version оf “The philosophy of name” (1927), finally the monography “The philosophy of Plotinus” has become one of the sources for the book “The ancient cosmos and the modern science” (1927). Through the textological comparison of German annotations with the published works by Losev the author comes to the conclusion they could be dated on the beginning of the 1920s, not later but the summer of 1923. According to the author's hypothesis these annotations togetherb with the other German texts by Losev cold be an evidence for his contacts with german academic scholars at the beginning of the 1920s.
In the S. Horujy’ text the "non-philosophy" of François Laruelle is treated as a phenomenon belonging to the modern trend of the deterritorialization of philosophy and choosing the way of the deterritorialization into science. Laruelle’s way of the deterritorialization is described, in which an interdisciplinary conceptual framework is constructed basing on transformed elements of quantum mechanics. Critical arguments of Husserl, Heidegger and Habermas against the deterritorialization into science are discussed and it is pointed out that non-philosophy exploits also another and directly opposite way of the deterritorialization, that into “non-semantics”, the discourse with disconnected meanings of its elements. Here non-philosophy becomes close to some currents in avant-garde art, which practiced so called transreason. The author discovers, in particular, profound similarity of discursive positions of Laruelle and Russian oberiuts. The resulting assessment of the combination of two opposite discursive strategies in non-philosophy is presented.
Nikolay Karamzin was a special person of his time. He was the first Russian traveler who went to the West not to learn, but to observe, he was the reformer of the Russian language, combining Russian identity with European words, and the first Russian historian, Russian "Tacitus". Karamzin, no doubt, has created a new type of Russian cultural person, which has come a long way to understand what means to be an enlightened individual.
In the paper the history of concept " new people " on materials of the Russian classical literature as it is presented to S.A.Nikolsky's monographies " Russian outlook “ New people ” as idea and the phenomenon: experience of judgement in domestic philosophy and the classical literature 40-60-х years of XIX century. (М.: Progress-tradition, 2012)is considered.
The new German text of A.F. Losev (1893–1988), his brief annotations of the four earlier works, is introduced into scientific circulation for the first time and translated into Russian. The Russian translation has been prepared printed on original typo-script from the personal archive of the philosopher. The commentary to the translation presents results if the synoptic comparison of this text with other Losev's published texts which gives reasons to date the German text on the beginning of 1920s, before summer 1923. All conjectures are put in angle brackets. German words for some terms are put in brackets. The paralells from the Version 2 und Version 3 are remarked in the commentary. All editor's notes and remarks in the citations from Version 3 are reproduced: author's underlines are shown with bolts, strikethroughs are put in square brackets, conjectures and editor's remarks are put in angle brackets.
The essay on thinking of thinking. The article is motivated by the 80-th birth anniversary of outstanding psychologist and pedagogue V.V. Davydov who was engaged, in collaboration with D.B. Elkonin, in elaboration of psychological foundations and pedagogical practices of developing education. The program he has devised focused on the advance of schoolchildren’s capacity for theoretical thinking and formation of readiness, inclination and capacity for conceptual thinking. An attempt to apply V.V. Davydov’s ideas to analysis of the thinking per se is made. Special attention is given to reflexion and intuition.