• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 282
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Кон И. С. Вопросы философии. 2010. № 5.
Added: Oct 22, 2010
Article
Ионин Л. Г. Вопросы философии. 2007. № 3. С. 3-14.
Added: Mar 28, 2009
Article
Осминская Н. А. Вопросы философии. 2011. № 2. С. 151-158.

The publication presents the Russian translation of selected chapters from "Dissertatio de Arte Combinatoria" by G.W. Leibniz, one of his earliest works. These chapters were published separately in 1666 under the title "Disputatio Arithmetica de complexionibus" and never translated into Russian. In his introduction the translator analyses the main themes of the "Dissertation" in there connection to the projects of universal science developed by R. Lull, E. Weigel, J. Biesterfeld and in the context of metaphysical and logical researches of Leibniz.

Added: Sep 20, 2012
Article
Кантор В. К. Вопросы философии. 2019. № 8. С. 124-134.

The article deals with the fate of one of the greatest thinkers and writers of the late 19th – mid 20th centuries Dmitry Merezhkovsky, creator of the novel trilogy “Christ and the Antichrist”, a treatise that shook the whole of Europe, “L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky”, the creator of the meanings of the Silver age. The author’s interest is focused on the idea of the Second, Christian Revival, which, according to Merezhkovsky, should take into account the experience of the Renaissance; it “will find the Holy Flesh”, turning conscious efforts not in the previous, pagan era, but directly into Christianity itself. Merezhkovsky saw The Second Revival in the possibilities of new imagery of Russian literature, imbued with the new trends of the mysterious “John’s Christianity”. He outlined Russian literature, earlier than L. Shestov, as a Russian philosophy of the cultures in a series of philosophical articles – “The Forthcoming Ham”, “Sick Russia”, “The Prophet of the Russian revolution” perceived by contemporaries as a revelation of a new era. After Joachim of Fiore Merezhkovsky actualized the idea of the Third Testament. This actualization had a huge impact on the society and culture of European countries. The author shows that Merezhkovsky seems to be testing Christianity for the possibility of preserving and realizing human freedom. The thinker argues that Christianity has lost the very idea of freedom, so Nietzsche is right to speak with his “Antichrist” against the Christian Church. The article shows that the Joachim of Fiore’s idea of the Third Testament, accepted by Merezhkovsky, would facilitate the return of freedom to Christianity when the way for the Second Revival will be opened. Every idea is changing in the minds its of supporters. The article notes that instead of freedom in the idea of the Third Testament, the Nazis saw the idea of the Third Reich. The fate of Merezhkovsky in the era of Nazism and Bolshevik totalitarianism was an endless flight. The author comes to the conclusion that the idea of freedom, which was to be realized in the Third Testament of Merezhkosky, was the answer of the intellectual and writer to the practice of totalitarian structures of the ideocracy of the 20th century. 

Added: Aug 24, 2019
Article
Углева А. В. Вопросы философии. 2016. № 10. С. 47-57.

The purpose of this article consists in identification of the bases of a normativeness in modern ethics, object of studying in which is not practice, but moral knowledge. The modern moral philosophy developed from opposition between intellectualism where the Good was thought in categories "true" and "false", and sentimentalism for which there is no moral truth, but there are only moral emotions and feelings. Today this discussion is still actual, however it has got new sense in connection with criticism of ethical rationalism and realism in modern metaethics.

Added: Jun 14, 2016
Article
Порус В. Н. Вопросы философии. 2014. № 11. С. 52-62.
Added: Nov 20, 2014
Article
Порус В. Н. Вопросы философии. 2014. № 11. С. 52-62.
In the article actual methodological problems of modern psychology as they are put and solved within the frame of cultural-historical psychology are considered. Organic interrelation of this branch of a psychological science with anthropocentrical philosophy of culture is shown. The conclusion that prospects of creative contacts of psychologists and philosophers of cultural- historical orientation are connected with opposition to cultural crisis is done.
Added: Mar 6, 2016
Article
Кантор В. К., Порус В. Н., Пружинин Б. И. Вопросы философии. 2016. № 3. С. 5-50.

For the last two decades a large number of philosophical texts have been issued including texts that were formerly hard to access for a Russian reader – publications of the works of Russian philosophers that had not been issued for wide circles of readers, translations (including from eastern languages), publications of the archival materials and epistolary heritage of the philosophers. Notwithstanding, in cases of quality issues the process of publishing itself generally used to be accompanied by signifi  cant preparative work – research, philological, commentary and philosophically-interpretative work. Vast experience has been accumulated in this sphere. While at the same time, a number of signifi  cant philosophic-methodological problems have been revealed. At the center of this problem fi  eld lies the question – is there any specifi  city in the work of publishing preparation of archival philosophical texts? Is the publishing preparation of such a philosophical text differentiated from that of the preparation of any other translated or archival literary work that requires transcription or commentary? Or is this a sphere of exclusively philological work? What is the specifi  city of philosophical translation and can we represent the archival publication as a type of “translation”? And so on. Certain answers to these questions defi  ne not only the peculiarities of publishing projects and the choice of readership, but also the situation in the intellectual culture of Russia. Therefore it is often surrounded by quite distinct polemics. It is supposed, that an acute necessity of comprehensive discussion of correlated thematics has emerged today. Furthermore the accumulated experience allows the clarification of the practical requirements for publication.

Added: Mar 24, 2016
Article
Алюшин А. Л., Князева Е. Н. Вопросы философии. 2007. № 12. С. 81-96.
Added: Mar 8, 2009
Article
Пружинин Б. И., Апресян Р. Г., Артемьева О. В. и др. Вопросы философии. 2017. № 10. С. 5-46.

In April 2017 in the journal Voprosy Filosofii took place a round-table format conference dedicated to the discussion of the situation that developed in the sphere of modern ethical investigations and perspectives of ethical problematics in Russian philosophical ethics. The relevance of the conference’s topic is determined by the fact that nowadays the spiritual atmosphere in the country and in the world is rapidly changing. That is why ethical problematics becomes the key element of philosophical work as in our country and also abroad. The participants of the conference set the task to analyze moral alternatives of the modern world conditioned by the ethics orientation on absolute foundations of morality on one hand, and on the other hand by the factual relativity of these norms, that expresses in the detachment of applied ethics from the philosophical ethics. In the center of discussion were problems and difficulties in Russian ethical investigations and the attempts to determine the priorities of their near-future development. All the participants of the occurred heated discussions agreed that the contemporary situation in ethics can be adequately understood only in the broad historical context of philosophical experiments in this sphere and first of all in the context of relevant philosophical-methodological problematics. Below are published the materials of the conference.

Added: Feb 3, 2018
Article
Левин С. М. Вопросы философии. 2013. № 7. С. 144-153.

The  paper  claims  all  metaphysical  views  could  be  divided  in  two  classes:  metaphysical moral exclusivism that is the idea of the otherworldly nature of morality, and metaphysical moral inclusivism that is the idea that morality is an intrinsic component of the reality. The originality of the proposed separation is justifi ed by historical review and the comparison with known ethical concepts. We also consider how the metaphysical notions of morality should correlate with the methodology of the empirical study of moral consciousness. We show that asking the question about the place of morality in the structure of reality imposes some theoretical constraints upon the Is-Ought Problem.

Added: Oct 11, 2013
Article
Князева Е. Н., Куркина Е. С. Вопросы философии. 2009. № 9. С. 116-131.
The authors paint a portrait of Sergey Pavlovich Kurdyumov (1928-2004) as a scientist and a man and demonstrate his substantial contribution to the development of the modern interdisciplinary theory and of methodology of study in complex self-organizing systems. They explore the content of main concepts and notions introduced by him, such as eigen functions of a nonlinear medium, tempoworlds, the nonlinear principle of superposition or the principle of co-evolution of complex structures, cyclicity of evolution of complex systems, soft, resonant control of complex systems, and show the possible ways of application of these notions to futures studies (social forecasting), to the understanding of functioning of creative intuition and of directions of reform of education. Kurdyumov was a master of problem definition and a genuine thinker of the modern epoch of interdisciplinarity.
Added: Jan 26, 2014
Article
Филиппов А. Ф. Вопросы философии. 2013. № 11. С. 155-168.

Hannah Arendt did not consider herself a philosopher and was not going to create any general doctrine of man. However, Arendt wrote philosophical works, and she never lost sight of what was going on in the German philosophical anthropology for about half a century. The polemics with philosophical anthropology forms one of the important, albeit implicit themes of her works. She criticized Martin Heidegger, one of her main philosophical mentors, drawing on some arguments that were mostly like those Max Scheler, the founder the German philosophical anthropology, used against Heidegger. The last great work that Arendt did not even prepare to print, her book “The Life of the Mind”, based on her Gifford Lectures. Here, especially in the first

Added: Nov 19, 2013
Article
Климова С. М. Вопросы философии. 2010. № 5. С. 115-125.

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of philosophical outlook insurance and examined its effect on the development of Tolstoy as a philosopher 

Added: Sep 20, 2014
Article
Гаспарян Д. Э. Вопросы философии. 2019. № 6. С. 62-75.

The article is devoted to the comparison of M. Mamardashvili`s and H. Arendt`s ideas on the nature of thinking, evil, moral and political actions. Comparing ideas of these two thinkers the following thesis is justified: both authors explore the idea of law as a special type of supernatural community and human solidarity. They also emphasize that to be moral means to practice the thinking (reflection) which is always in process and neverstops.

Added: Sep 29, 2018
Article
Щедрина Т. Г. Вопросы философии. 2009. № 6. С. 177-183.
Added: Jun 24, 2013