The matters relating to the history of the investment legislation development in Russia are considered; regulations, adopted at different phases of history, which govern investment activities in the security market, are characterized. Special attention is given to the characterization of current investment legislation, the legal regulation evolution phase passed by the Russian security market. The currently adopted deregulations, governing the securities institution, are also analyzed.
The article gives a theoretical justification to such legal phenomenon, which is the blanket rule, and as well as in relation to technical regulation are analyzed some trends and patterns of use.
In the article questions of administrative discretion are considered. The historical analogies in the doctrinal approaches to the definition of the nature and content of administrative discretion in the Russian Empire and in modern Russia are carried out. Factors influencing the balance of rights and discretions in various epoches of historical development of the Russian state are identified.
This article is devoted to the legal and regulatory framework that is used by the police. The author analyzes the law "On Police" as a fundamental source of police enforcement.
The article is devoted to the existence of private legislative initiative in the history of Russia. Special attention is given to theoretical issues to identify ways and procedures of participation of private actors in the lawmaking process. Periods in the development of private legislative initiative are allocated. Historical analogies with modern components of the legislative process are designated.
In this article process of formation of development of customs system and customs legal relationship of Russia during the post-war period under the influence of influence СЭВ, СТС and cancellations of monopoly for foreign trade will be investigated and analyzed.
Legislation on examinational requirements for seekers of Master's and Doctor's law degree in the Russian universities of the XIX century is analysed. The author makes examples of such tests, mentions opinions of contemporary jurists.
The article elaborates upon the individual approach concerning a legal liability in the regulatory system of migrational processes. The author, using instances, illustrates the diversity of a regulatory function of the responsibility. The conclusion, regarding the necessity of more careful development of illegal labor migration's countermeasures, is rationalized.