• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 182
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Бочавер А. А., Кузнецова В. Б., Бианки Е. М. и др. Вопросы психологии. 2015. № 5. С. 146-157.
Added: Feb 9, 2016
Article
Радина Н. К., Ким Н. В. Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 6. С. 65-74.

In this article the results of empiric research of youth conspicuous consumption are presented. There were identified a group of “naive anti-consumerists” who ignore consumption as a social activity. It is stated that “naive anti-consumerists” has a lack of psychological recourses to promote the ideology of anti-consumerism. It is also supposed that the ideology of anti-consumerism is promoted by groups that are oriented on conspicuous consumption with “new content”.

Added: Oct 13, 2014
Article
Зирко А. В., Орлов А. Б. Вопросы психологии. 2018. № 6. С. 40-48.
Added: Feb 11, 2019
Article
Петровский В. А., Бодрова Е. В., Давыдов В. и др. Вопросы психологии. 1989. № 3.
Added: Nov 10, 2010
Article
Мандрикова Е. Ю. Вопросы психологии. 2005. № 6. С. 54-62.
Added: Nov 2, 2010
Article
Зинченко В. П. Вопросы психологии. 2009. № 3. С. 72-82.
Added: Mar 9, 2011
Article
Зинченко В. П. Вопросы психологии. 1996.
Added: Feb 8, 2014
Article
Орлов А. Б. Вопросы психологии. 2003. № 1. С. 154-158.
Added: Jan 28, 2010
Article
Пермогорский М. С., Поддьяков А. Н. Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 2. С. 3-14.

The paper looks into the contemporary state of the problem of decision-making and preference of some alternatives over others, discussing intransitivity of relations of superiority: one object is superior to another in a certain aspect, while the second is superior to the third and the third is superior to the first (A>B, B>C, C>A). The authors analyze two broad groups of theories and empirical studies reflecting opposite views on the nature of the relations and rationality of intransitivity of relations of superiority. The authors argue that understanding of intransitivity of superiority relations is no less important line of cognitive development than understanding of transitivity; they should be studied as complementary subjects. Thus it is necessary to study individual differences in cognitive sets with regard to transitivity/intransitivity of superiority, as well as individual characteristics of solving problems of that kind.

Added: Oct 9, 2013
Article
Орлов А. Б. Вопросы психологии. 2000. № 2. С. 52-55.
Added: Feb 9, 2010
Article
Гулевич О. А., Спиридонов В. Ф., Безменова И. К. и др. Вопросы психологии. 2011. № 2. С. 121-128.
Added: Oct 1, 2012
Article
Егорова П. А., Осин Е. Н., Кедрова Н. Б. и др. Вопросы психологии. 2018. № 3. С. 22-33.
Added: Oct 18, 2017
Article
Зинченко В. П. Вопросы психологии. 2009. № 2.
Added: Sep 23, 2010
Article
Ениколопов С. Н., Ясная В. А. Вопросы психологии. 2007. № 7. С. 25-47.
Added: Nov 18, 2010
Article
Евдокименко А. С. Вопросы психологии. 2007. № 3. С. 158-166.
Added: Nov 14, 2013
Article
Самоненко И. Ю., Самоненко Ю. А., Жильцова О. А. Вопросы психологии. 2013. Т. 5. С. 81-93.
Added: Sep 28, 2018