• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 124
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Карпенко И. А. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2014. Т. XL. № 2. С. 110-126.

The article presents the possible role of measurement in quantum-mechanical description of physical reality. The widely spread interpretations of quantum phenomena are considered as indicating the apparent connection between conscious processes (such as observation) and the properties of the microcosm. The reasons for discrepancies between the results of observations of the microcosm and macrocosm and the potential association of consciousness with these reasons are closely investigated. The mentioned connection is meant to be interpreted in the sense that the probable requirement for a complete understanding of quantum theory is the adequate description of consciousness within it and that the correct theory of consciousness should include quantum-mechanical theoretical apparatus. The author draws the conclusions about the current state of the “measuring” problem in its relationship with consciousness. The research is based on current ideas of several leading physicists, philosophers and mathematicians

Added: Apr 29, 2014
Article
Катречко С. Л. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2011. Т. XXVIII. № 2. С. 205-213.
Added: Nov 18, 2013
Article
Селиверстов В. В., Попик О. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2013. № 2. С. 210-218.
Added: Oct 1, 2013
Article
Катречко С. Л. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2011. Т. XXVIII . № 2. С. 213-229.
Added: Nov 18, 2013
Article
Демин М. Р., Мочалова И. Н. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2011. Т. 29. № 3. С. 227-232.
Added: Oct 24, 2011
Article
Левин С. М. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2018. Т. 55. № 2. С. 153-164.
Added: Oct 20, 2017
Article
Горбатова Ю. В. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2008. № 3. С. 199-210.
Added: Oct 15, 2012
Article
Кузин И. А. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2015. Т. XLVI. № 4. С. 163-179.

Classical, selectionist (adaptationist) evolutionary epistemology of science draws an analogy between development of science and natural selection. But natural selection immediately increases only the relative fitness of organisms with regard to specific and changing environment. Therefore evolutionary epistemology of science is exploited (by van Fraassen in particular) against scientific realism which presumes existence of absolute scientific progress as an approach to truth. In modern biology in order to explain absolute evolutionary progress nonadaptationist, nonselectionist models based on a passive trend mechanism (a random walk limited by walls) were worked out, the ratchet model in particular. This paper suggests nonadaptationist extension of evolutionary epistemology of science, namely the ratchet model of scientific progress and illustrates it by history of thermodynamics. This model enables to combine realistic concept of scientific progress as an approach to truth with antirealistic concept of scientific development as an improvement of problem-solving ability: the former is ascribed to scientific dynamics on a global scale and the latter on a  local.

Added: Oct 19, 2016
Article
Левин С. М., Гаспаров И. Г. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2015. № 2. С. 5-19.
Added: Jul 1, 2015
Article
Порус В. Н., Касавин И. Т. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2018. Т. 55. № 4. С. 8-25.
Added: Dec 3, 2018
Article
Левин С. М. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2013. Т. XXXVIII. № 4. С. 104-116.
Added: Jan 4, 2014
Article
Дубровский Д. И. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2008. № 4.
Added: Oct 28, 2010
Article
Горбатов В. В. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. Т. XXVI. № 4. С. 240-244.
Added: Mar 5, 2011
Article
Столярова О. Е. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. № 2. С. 65-67.
Added: Dec 18, 2010
Article
Горбатова Ю. В. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2017. Т. 53. № 3. С. 229-239.

This work is a review of the book by Stephen T. Davis “God, Reason, and Theistic Proofs". The author discusses some methodological, logical and ontological advantages and disadvantages of this book as well as some features related to the translation of the book into Russian. The analysis is presented here not in chronological (chapter by chapter), but in a thematic order that enables the reader to get quickly acquainted with topics and problems considered in the book.

Added: Sep 5, 2017
Article
Князева Е. Н. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. № 1. С. 42-49.
Added: Jan 26, 2014
Article
Малли Э. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2014. Т. XLII. № 4. С. 209-217.
Added: Nov 30, 2014
Article
Порус В. Н. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2012. Т. XXXII. № 2. С. 5-15.
Added: May 3, 2013
Article
Демин М. Р. Эпистемология и философия науки. 2010. Т. 24. № 2. С. 195-214.
Added: Mar 8, 2011