• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 127
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Апресян В. Ю. Вопросы языкознания. 2014. № 2. С. 3-26.
Added: Oct 13, 2013
Article
Калашников А. В. Вопросы языкознания. 2010. № 5. С. 121-129.
Added: Oct 28, 2010
Article
Богомолова Н. К. Вопросы языкознания. 2012. № 5. С. 101-124.
Added: Oct 19, 2014
Article
Орехов Б. В. Вопросы языкознания. 2011. № 3. С. 153-155.

The article deals with the conference «Slavicorp» in Warsaw in November 2010.

Added: Sep 28, 2013
Article
Кюсева М. В., Киммельман В. И. Вопросы языкознания. 2019. № 5. С. 120-134.
Added: Nov 28, 2018
Article
Шаврина Т. О. Вопросы языкознания. 2017. № 4. С. 115-134.
This paper discusses the history of methods of automatic spelling correction and the requirements faced by systems implementing such methods at different historical stages. Despite the fact that, since 1960s, the quality of correction has been steadily increasing, two basic technological problems remain: detection  of a misspelled word and selection of the optimal candidate for correction. A detailed analysis of contex- tual features (such as symbolic context, morphological and syntactic characteristics) for NLP-applications  utilizing automatic spelling correction can be useful for further improvement of performance in both prob- lematic areas.
Added: Sep 12, 2017
Article
Иомдин Б. Л. Вопросы языкознания. 2014. № 4. С. 87-103.

The paper discusses various techniques of discovering and describing lexical ambiguity. This is one of the top issues in computational linguistics. A variety of techniques are used for word sense disambiguation, but all of them are based on context. Yet, studying how word senses work without context and what patterns of polysemous words could be found in speakers’ minds also seems an interesting and important issue. The main approaches to WSD with or without context (in narrow and broad sense, including the situational context) are evaluated. The importance of corpora in discovering word senses is substantiated. New experimental data are presented, which allow defining subsets of senses for polysemous words for different speakers and rating the senses in the dictionary. Finally, the paper proposes to distinguish between absolute and relative polysemy and to search for ways of their adequate lexicographic description. 

 

Added: Aug 20, 2014
Article
Козлов А. А. Вопросы языкознания. 2016. № 1. С. 51-75.

The paper proposes a diachronic explanation of the syntax of resultatives in Moksha Mordvin

Added: Oct 4, 2017
Article
Рахилина Е. В., Тестелец Я. Г. Вопросы языкознания. 2016. № 2. С. 7-21.

The paper addresses Charles Fillmore’s contribution to modern linguistics. We discuss Fillmore’s fundamental ideas such as Case Grammar, presupposition, deixis, frame, compositionality, Construction Grammar, which have significantly influenced its current development.

Added: Jun 5, 2016
Article
Иткин И. Б. Вопросы языкознания. 2014. № 2. С. 27-45.
Added: Sep 30, 2015
Article
Зорина З. А. Вопросы языкознания. 2008. № 4. С. 41-50.
Added: Mar 10, 2010
Article
Летучий А. Б. Вопросы языкознания. 2013. № 1. С. 143-147.

In the article, linguistic projects which are supported by Russian Fund for Humanities in 2012 are briefly considered.

Added: Oct 24, 2013
Article
Резникова Т. И., Выренкова А. С. Вопросы языкознания. 2016. № 6. С. 142-149.

The paper presents an annual overview of scientific projects - conferences and expeditions - supported by Russian Foundation for the Humanities in 2016

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica}
Added: Mar 3, 2017
Article
Скачедубова М. В. Вопросы языкознания. 2018. № 5. С. 64-76.

The article analyzes l-forms without an auxiliary with a meaning of a pre-past action. Such l-participles are usually regarded as perfect forms used in pluperfect contexts. However, it will be shown that apparently we deal with the rise of a specialized for expressing the grammatical meaning of result, for which the correlation with time (present or past) was irrelevant. This interpretation is confirmed with the material of Modern Russian dialects with -shi / -vshi perfect and pluperfect, where the -shi / -vshi form used without the auxiliary in the past tense can mean the result pertaining not only to the present, but also to the past.

Added: Oct 3, 2018