• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 69
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Виняр А. И., Герасименко Е. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2018.
Added: Dec 12, 2017
Article
Рахман Д. М. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2019. Т. 15. № 2. С. 213-228.

This paper addresses the system of purpose clauses in Hill Mari. It focuses on the conditions licensing omission of infinitival purpose clause subjects. Basically, these emerge where such subjects corefer to the matrix subject or indirect object. In cases of embedded predicate’s unaccusativity and direct object coreference, however, the subordinate subject can be omitted. Since this interdependence between unaccusativity of purpose clauses and options for their subjects omission have escaped the attention of previous typological studies, a question arises about the nature of this interdependence and its relation to other phenomena observed in Hill Mari. A similar pattern is observed in cases of argument omission in coordinate clauses where the first conjunct’s subject coreferent to the second conjunct’s object can only be omitted if the first clause’s verb is unaccusative. Given that the null pronominal (pro) analysis, usually implied in similar cases, proves to be empirically inadequate here, I propose to view this phenomenon as a case of argument ellipsis.

Added: Jan 15, 2020
Article
Летучий А. Б. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014. Т. 10. № 2. С. 292-330.

In the article, the relevance of Bybee's opposition of product-based generalizations vs. source-based generalizations for syntax is argued. Corpus data of Russian are used.

Added: Oct 6, 2014
Article
Князев М. Ю. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 11.0px Helvetica; color: #000000}

In this paper I analyze the construction with an independent infinitive clause and the subjunctive particle бы in Russian. I show that this construction has evaluative meaning and is ambiguous depending on whether it expresses the point of view of the speaker or the dative subject. I propose an empirical generalization, according to which the latter interpretation can only arise with certain word orders, namely when the dative subject linearly precedes the subjunctive particle. I offer a tentative account of this generalization from the perspective of an approach in which pragmatic categories such as point of view are syntactically represented.

Added: Oct 30, 2017
Article
Кувшинская Ю. М. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2015. Т. XI. № 2. С. 659-688.

The paper is focused on the influence of Theme-Rheme-structure on predicate agreement with quantifier phrases which contain a mention of an indefinite quantity. The author considers the dependence of the predicate choice on theme or rheme position of the quantifier phrase and reveals that the possibility of implementing different Theme-Rheme structures and its influence on predicate choice are unequal in the sentences with different quantifiers. The communicative conditions for singular or plural predicate agreement with quantifier phrases which contain neskolko, mnogo, nemalo, are described. The author concludes that singular predicate corresponds to the focus on the quantifier phrase (rhematic position or thematic position in contrast), the plural choice is conditioned by the focus on the other part of the sentence. Some specific communicative strategies such as superposition of rheme are considered.

Added: Apr 7, 2015
Article
Тагабилева М. Г. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014. Т. X. № 1. С. 854-864.
Added: Nov 10, 2013
Article
Козлов А. А., Кухто А. В., Привизенцева М. Ю. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 1. С. 522-533.

The paper present the lexical-typological approach to the problem of reality of "semantic fields"

Added: Oct 4, 2017
Article
Ахапкина Я. Э. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2015. Т. XI. № 1. С. 639-662.

A non-native Russian speaker at the advanced level of language proficiency makes the same mistakes as a native speaker does; however, these mistakes are much more frequent as the non-native speaker is influenced heavily by Russian language system and speech patterns.

Added: Feb 24, 2016
Article
Иванова К. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2017. Т. 13. № 3. С. 606-619.

Russian jussives with a particle pust’, while being rare and late acquired, still demonstrate some features special for child-adult communication. The communicative situation influences the characteristics of these constructions in terms of the use of aspect and transitive verbs, causing dissimilarity between child-directed and adult-directed speech. 

Added: Oct 31, 2017
Article
Ляшевская О. Н. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014. Т. X. № 2. С. 332-361.
Added: Oct 7, 2014
Article
Баранова В. В. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2014. Т. X. № 2. С. 99-120.

The paper briefly describes the formal and semantic properties of Russian construction composed of поди and a second imperative form VIMPER. The construction поди VIMPER may represent either unrealizable action from the speaker’s point of view or an action perceived by the speaker as very difficult. The theoretical framework used in this study is based on Construction Grammar. Поди VIMPER construction inherits its properties both from Russian non-directive imperative readings (or pseudo-imperative constructions) and from discourse word поди.

Added: Sep 29, 2014
Article
Федотов М. Л. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2012. Т. 8. № 1. С. 371-445.

The article comprises a study of a developed polysemy of the markers of two spatial cases, ablative (main allomorph  -lt) and elative (main allomorph  -st). Apart from the central meaning (source of movement—with orientations ‘at’ / (‘near’) and ‘in’ / ‘at’ respectively), each of these two markers is able to express a wide and diverse range of peripheral meanings that no longer provide any single invariant meaning. Examples of the most sematically “isolated” meanings discussed in the article are detected property (He looks happy), theme (I write about people), subject of evaluation (To my [mind], it was…). On the other hand, some groups of meanings semantically adjacent and connected to the central ones (in one way or another) can surely be found, too.  This description may have made a certain contribution to the study of Finnish and other Baltic Finnic languages. The analysis of some meanings—such as secondary object of trade exchange (…paid five roubles for the pencil, …bought the pencil for five roubles) or “captative” (I carry the bag by the handles)—may be of interest from typological point of view also.

Added: Oct 31, 2018
Article
Сударикова Е. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2018. Т. 14. С. 428-443.

This article includes the study of the properties of possessive and relative markers in Chukchi language (-in(e)/-en(a) и -kin(e)/-ken(a)). The co-occurence with different parts of speech was observed using animacy hierarchy. The incorporation and predicativisation ability was also analysed.

Added: Nov 23, 2017
Article
Холодилова М. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 1. С. 237-250.
Added: Jun 30, 2017
Article
Стенин И. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2010. Т. VI. № 3. С. 161-166.

The paper concerns the main syntactic and semantic features of a basic converb in the Tundra Nenets language. According to certain classifications, the converb in Tundra Nenets should be regarded as a non-canonical, varying-subject, and contextual converb. It retains most verbal properties, and could be regularly built on the basis of any verbal stem. The converb can occupy the positions of adjunct, complement, and nominal attribute. The temporal (taxis) interpretation of the converb depends on the aspectual characteristics of the verbal stem from which it is derived. The research is based on the analysis of the examples from the published sources and on the author’s own fieldwork on the Yamal Peninsula.

Added: Oct 15, 2016
Article
Ганенков Д. С. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. 12. № 1. С. 53-64.
Added: Oct 23, 2016
Article
Руднев П. В. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2011. Т. VII. № 3. С. 184-188.
Added: Sep 12, 2017
Article
Буденная (Сидорова) Евгения Владимировна Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 1. С. 40-52.
Added: Nov 1, 2019
Article
Федотов М. Л. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 2. С. 67-83.

The article focuses on the dialogical (non-narrative) uses of Russian delimitative predicates with prefix po  (poguljat’, porabotat’). In dialogical discourse, such predicates almost obligatorily receive perfect interpretation (i. e. in almost all cases — at least for non-topical predicates — they always express the semantics of current relevance). They differ in this respect from the transformative perfective verbs (napisat’, kupit’), which also frequently receive perfect interpretation in dialogical discourse, but it can be easily cancelled. In addition, in dialogical discourse delimitative verbs form a functional opposition with the corresponding imperfective verbs (in their “general-factual” uses) (cf. a pair Ja pospal vs. Ja spal). While the former express perfect semantics proper (current relevance semantics) — Ja pospal; Ja uže poguljal, — the latter express opposite experiential ~ “existential” semantics — Ja spal; Ja uže guljal. Given the fact that the delimitative derivation is highly productive in Russian (delimitative predicate can be formed from almost any imperfective verb), it can be considered to perform in Russian the role of a specialized perfect for atelic situations and for telic situations not achieving their natural endpoint. At the same time this device is (almost) obligatory in this function only in dialogical discourse in non-topical uses. The role of “non-perfect” grammatical device in the same conditions is performed by corresponding imperfective predicates.

Added: Nov 5, 2018
Article
Козлов А. А., Муравьёв Н. А., Никифорова С. О. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 1. С. 534-547.

The paper deals with a Moksha Mordvin aspectual morpheme which is ambiguous between inchoative and anticausative

Added: Oct 4, 2017
Article
Козлов А. А. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2016. Т. XII. № 1. С. 534-547.

The paper deals with semantic and morphosyntax of one aspectual derivation in Moksha

Added: Oct 3, 2017