• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 467
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Троцук И. В., Никулин А. М. Социологические исследования. 2018. № 2. С. 92-101.
Added: Oct 9, 2018
Article
Кучмаева О. В. Социологические исследования. 2010. № 7.
Added: Oct 5, 2010
Article
Кодзима С. Социологические исследования. 2009. № 6. С. 121-131.
Added: Jan 22, 2017
Article
Щеглова Д. В., Глухова А. В., Сиденко О. А. и др. Социологические исследования. 2020. Т. 46. № 2. С. 43-52.

The most urgent issue in Russian public discourse is search for the best future and the way to achieve it. The authors present the results of a Russian expert survey carried out by the project «Domestic Political Agenda as a Unity Factor in Modern Russia». Experts' views on the desired future for Russia, the foundations of value consensus and the problems of building national unity are examined in the paper. The domestic political agenda was analyzed via triple scholarly optics: official (government), civil and public («people's») agendas, i.e. public request for power. The government and public agendas are the most inharmonious and they need more civil alternatives suggested. The authors note weakness of converting the three forms into each other and the primacy of a foreign policy course, viewing this as a threat to Russia's unity. All experts showed extraordinary unity in the assertion that there is no consolidated agenda in modern Russia.

Added: Apr 2, 2020
Article
Московская А. А. Социологические исследования. 2012. Т. 335. № 3. С. 16-21.
Added: Jan 31, 2013
Article
Богоявленский Д. Д. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 8.
Added: Oct 5, 2009
Article
Цыганов В. В., Шульц В. Л. Социологические исследования. 2012. Т. 40. № 8. С. 85-93.
Added: Aug 13, 2019
Article
Девятко И. Ф. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 1. С. 45-46.
Added: Sep 11, 2010
Article
Балабанова Е. С. Социологические исследования. 2002. № 11. С. 26-36.
Added: Jun 11, 2018
Article
Костенко В. В. Социологические исследования. 2014. № 11. С. 52-59.
Added: Oct 15, 2014
Article
Санина А. Г. Социологические исследования. 2014. № 12. С. 3-11.

The paper provides an oveerview of approaches to identity and analyses consequences of transfer of identity notion from socio-psychological and socio-cultural sphere into practical politics. Boundaries for interdisciplinary research of indetity are defined. Author concludes that indentity issues acquire in contemporary academic discourse and interdisciplinary character. Explanatory and discourse potential of the category makes students apply it to different areas of social reality. However, methodological consistency of the framework “essentalism – constructivism” and “individual – collective indentity” as a basis for interpreting research subject are still essential to formation of identity theory.

 

Added: Jun 11, 2015
Article
Аксенова О. В. Социологические исследования. 2004. № 11.
Added: Dec 2, 2008
Article
Замятин Д. Н. Социологические исследования. 2012. № 2. С. 3-11.
Added: Jan 24, 2018
Article
Санина А. Г. Социологические исследования. 2012. № 3. С. 77-87.
Added: Apr 5, 2013
Article
Санина А. Г. Социологические исследования. 2012. Т. 335. № 3. С. 77-87.
Added: Nov 18, 2012
Article
Нартова Н. А. Социологические исследования. 2019. Т. 45. № 12. С. 38-47.

The problematization of youth citizenship from the perspective of participation in traditional institutionalized politics not only questions the relevance of the dominant theoretical and methodological grounds for studying citizenship in modern conditions, but also calls for a new look at youth as a generation, including  their parents. The article is devoted to the analysis of ideas about citizenship in the generational perspective. Based on the concepts of everyday citizenship developed in youth research and a qualitative methodology, the work explores the meanings and interpretations of citizenship as part of personal experience by young adults (18-26 years) and their parents in St.Petersburg. The ideal-typical ideas about citizenship and the reflection on one’s own citizenship are consistently discussed.  The analysis of empirical material shows that young people have formed and share a relatively conventional model of citizenship as active involvement in social changes in everyday space. For the parent generation, citizenship is predominantly defined in moral and ethical categories and is manifested through responsible labor activity. At the same time, the more active and socially oriented position of youth leads to a change in intergenerational interaction: not only older generation transmit their values and experience to the younger, but also vice versa.

Added: Oct 31, 2019
Article
Мукомель В. И. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 2. С. 56-66.
Added: Aug 21, 2013
Article
Рывкина Р. В. Социологические исследования. 2005. № 6.
Added: Aug 25, 2013
Article
Соболева Н. Э. Социологические исследования. 2011. № 5. С. 90-95.

Added: Sep 14, 2012
Article
Мукомель В. И. Социологические исследования. 1999. № 6. С. 66-71.
Added: Aug 21, 2013
Article
Галицкая Е. Г., Галицкий Е. Б. Социологические исследования. 2013. № 3. С. 84-88.
Added: Jul 22, 2013