• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 323
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Клейнер Г. Б. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2005. Т. 14. № 4. С. 30-48.
Added: Apr 4, 2013
Article
Коваль Т. Б. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 1997. Т. 6. № 4. С. 151-170.
Added: Oct 8, 2012
Article
Овчарова Л. Н., Пишняк А. И. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2006. Т. 15. № 3. С. 134-157.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Article
Смирнов С. Н. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2005. Т. 14. № 4. С. 64-77.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Article
Шкаратан О. И. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2006. Т. 15. № 3. С. 3-30.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Article
Захаров С.В., Чурилова Е.В. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2013. Т. XXII. № 4. С. 86-117.

Based on reliable sources of statistical information and its quantitative analysis, the authors address the following questions: what is the real prevalence of single motherhood in Russia, taking into consideration different modes of defining the phenomenon; to what extent do the socio-demographic characteristics of women raising children in single parent and two-parent families differ; what is the probability that women with children will transition from one partnership status to another; and whether the average duration of parenting children in single-mother families has increased or decreased over the last decades. The paper uses data from the population censuses, extensive vital statistics, as well as data from two waves of a large sample survey "Parents and children, men and women in family and society," performed in the framework of the UNECE "Generations and Gender" comparative research program of surveys. Although single-mother families are significantly present in the structure of Russian families, our analysis does not confirm the widespread opinion that the number of single parent families in Russia is growing. The proportion of single mothers varies from 12% to 21% and the proportion of children under 18 years of age living in single parent families varies from 10% to 25% depending on the definition being used. On the whole, the social and demographic characteristics of single mothers and mothers bringing up children in unions do not differ significantly. However, single mothers share certain characteristics: more experience of changing partners, fewer numbers of children ever born, early orphanhood, diversity of values regarding family and children’s education, and greater economic vulnerability. Nonetheless, single motherhood is a temporary condition for a considerable number of women, a stage in the establishment of a two-parent family. The dynamism of single motherhood directly influences the conditions in which children are socialized within the family. The average duration of living in a single-parent family has decreased for children who were born in single parent families, and has increased for children who were born in two-parent families. The data confirm the growing instability of mothers’ marital/partnership status in both types of families. At the same time, over the last decades, a child’s overall probability and average duration of living in a two-parent family with someone other than the biological father have increased over the last decades, which may be assumed to entail a specific type of parenting and upbringing.

 

Added: Sep 27, 2013
Article
Тихонова Н. Е. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2003. Т. 12. № 1. С. 36-84.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Article
Темницкий А. Л. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2017. Т. 26. № 3. С. 64-89.
Added: Oct 22, 2018
Article
Шишкин С. В. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2003. Т. 12. № 3. С. 104-129.
Added: Oct 7, 2012
Article
Гудков Л. Д., Дубин Б. В., Левинсон А. Г. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2009. Т. 18. № 2. С. 22-33.
Added: Oct 2, 2012
Article
Медушевский А. Н. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 1997. Т. 6. № 3. С. 115-154.
Added: Oct 8, 2012
Article
Ястребов Г. А. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2010. Т. 19. № 3. С. 57-89.
Added: Oct 2, 2012
Article
Тихонова Н. Е., Каравай А. В. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2017. Т. 26. № 3. С. 6-35.

The article focuses on the questions concerning quality of the human capital of workers in modern Russia, their heterogeneity in that respect, and the role played by human capital in differentiation of Russian labor force in general and workers in particular. The analysis is based on the data from 24th wave of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey - Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) (October 2014 - February 2015); the sample is 12908 individuals, including 2352 workers. Identification of professional statuses was based on the ISCO-08. The article gives an overall assessment of the human capital of working Russians. It is shown that in respect of their human capital quality, workers are divided in two groups with 3:1 ratio. The smaller group possesses high-quality human capital, including higher level of learning experience and skills of using modern digital technologies. This subgroup of workers can make basic labor pool for innovative transformations in the Russian economy in the conditions of development of clear signals on the importance of professional training, in particular – in case of rigid connection between professional training and wages. Using various specifications of Mincer equation, it is shown that currently the situation is quite different, and the quality of human capital has practically no effect on the wages of workers. As a result, even workers with high-quality human capital mostly do not have professional training that match their employment profile (except for on the job training) and do not seek to improve their skills, considering their professionalism to be already high enough.

Added: Sep 16, 2017
Article
Климов И. А. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 1999. Т. 8. № 3. С. 133-152.
Added: Oct 8, 2012
Article
Коссов В. В. Мир России: Социология, этнология. 2000. Т. 9. № 2. С. 53-62.
Added: Oct 8, 2012