• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 388
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Терещенко Л. К. Закон. 2013. № 6. С. 36-43.
Added: Dec 18, 2013
Article
Белицкая А. В., Хаустов Д. Закон. 2013. № 6. С. 140-147.
Added: Nov 20, 2013
Article
Медведев И. Р. Закон. 2017. № 7. С. 115-127.
Added: Jul 31, 2017
Article
Гальперин М. Л., Степанов Д. И., Новоселова Л. А. и др. Закон. 2018. № 1. С. 18-27.
Added: Dec 13, 2019
Article
Крашенинников П. В., Толстой Ю.К., Верещагин А. Н. и др. Закон. 2019. № 1. С. 18-37.
Added: Sep 18, 2020
Article
Гальперин М. Л., Крашенинников П. В., Головко Л. и др. Закон. 2020. № 1. С. 22-51.
Added: Jun 19, 2020
Article
Алебастрова И. А., Рассказова Н. Ю., Савельев А. И. и др. Закон. 2021. № 1. С. 19-40.
Added: Feb 17, 2021
Article
Тай Ю. В. Закон. 2021. № 1. С. 19-40.

The commentary provides an expert assessment of the landmark legislative changes.

Added: Mar 16, 2021
Article
Алимова Т., Комягин Д. Л. Закон. 2008. № 9.
Added: Feb 26, 2010
Article
Медведев И. Р. Закон. 2015. № 6. С. 181-195.

This paper examines the concept of the ‘right to the city’ by offering an analysis of the roots of the idea: the writings of the French Marxist and social theorist Henri Lefebvre. While there has been a growing utilization of Henri Lefebvre’s concepts during past two decades all over the world, he is neither translated in Russian nor widely recognized among the national legal scholars. The article explores how his theoretical writings on space and the urban can be used to redefine the existing Moscow district courts’ practice. The author emphasizes the main dimensions of the Russian legal framework governing the right to the city (the right to a healthy environment, the right to take part in public hearings, the right to information, etc.) and some civil procedural problems in the context of Lefebvre’s heritage (public interest lawsuits, the discussion “a right or an interest?”).

Added: Nov 20, 2016
Article
Фогельсон Ю. Б. Закон. 2018. № 1. С. 108-126.

The paper proposes a method for studying the legal consciousness of judges, based on the analysis of judicial decisions, which overcomes certain limitations of questionnaires and interviews. The effectiveness of this method is shown — a study of several groups of Russian higher court judgments has allowed describing deep attitudes in the legal consciousness of judges of these courts. The analysis covered the legal reasoning of the RF Constitutional Court, the RF Supreme Court and the RF Supreme Arbitrazh (Commercial) Court as well as their interpretation of legal norms and the mechanisms for selecting decisions for referral to the Supreme courts. It is also shown that, despite the limited material used in the study, it is sufficient to make general and justified conclusions about the legal consciousness of judges.

Added: Jan 17, 2018
Article
Горохов Б. А. Закон. 2004. № 8.
Added: Sep 29, 2010
Article
Давыденко Д. Л. Закон. 2020. № 6. С. 130-140.

This paper provides an overview of the legal regulation and practice of Russian state arbitrazh (commercial) courts in cases of challenging arbitral awards. The paper specifies legal grounds and procedure for challenging arbitral awards in Russia, the typical arguments of the  applicants in contesting such awards. A tendency towards the setting aside by the state courts of the arbitral awards has been identified, the relevant statistical data are provided. Separately, the application by the courts of a public policy clause is analysed. Also, the paper examines the specific examples of the effect of setting aside the arbitral awards in Russia on the possibility of their subsequent enforcement internationally. The author argues for a more consistent recognition by the Russian courts of the importance and value of arbitration as a widely used method for resolving disputes, including those arising in international trade.

Added: Oct 30, 2020