• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Of all publications in the section: 420
Sort:
by name
by year
Article
Древаль М. И. Общественные науки и современность. 2015. № 5.

This article discusses the main factors of media image of the North Caucasus. The object of study is considered in the following three categories: the specificity of the region relative to its position in the Russian Federation, the historical and cultural factors of the formation of the image of the region, as well as features of news-making about the North Caucasus, in particular, on the federal TV channels. Based on the analysis it were identified three key characteristics of the image of the North Caucasus, broadcasted on federal television channels - a "explosiveness" of the region (terrorist activity), the high concentration of criminal groups and socio-economic disadvantage. The study was performed in the methodology of grounded theory based on the material of expert interviews.

Added: Aug 19, 2015
Article
Касамара В. А., Сорокина А. А. Общественные науки и современность. 2014. № 1. С. 107-118.
Added: Feb 24, 2014
Article
Шевчук А. В. Общественные науки и современность. 2007. № 3. С. 44-54.
Added: Sep 17, 2008
Article
Бессонова О. Э. Общественные науки и современность. 2006. № 2. С. 130-143.
Added: Mar 31, 2013
Article
Автономов В. С., Автономов Ю. В. Общественные науки и современность. 2016. № 4. С. 5-20.
Added: Dec 4, 2016
Article
Сунгуров А. Ю. Общественные науки и современность. 2019. № 4. С. 87-98.

Paper devoted to analysis of contemporary academician  and expert discussions about practices of public and (or) citizen expertise. Three main approaches to this notions are formulated as result of this analysis. First – when customer of expertise is in focus of analyses. Public (citizen) expertise is expertise, booked by NGOs according to this approach. Performers of expertise are specialists-experts. Second approach deals with expertise – monitoring of some governmental process  (human rights of prisoners, or electoral process, as examples)which realized by NGO members (sometime together with  specialists-experts). In framework of the third approach the citizen position (or absent of it) of specialist-expert in the focus of attention: possibility for the to define agenda of expertise by themselves, to define mist actual social-politic problems and to propose decisions of them.

Added: Nov 2, 2019
Article
Василенок Н. А., Полищук Л. И., Шагалов И. Л. Общественные науки и современность. 2019. № 2. С. 35-53.

The article investigates the public-state partnership, in which the society by its own forces and means is included along with the state, in the creation of public goods and services. The impact of such practices on the quality of public administration and public welfare, depending on the state of institutions, including the accountability of government to society, and on the stock of social capital, is discussed. The conclusions of the theory of public-public partnership are interpreted in the light of Russian realities, where the participation of society in the co-production of public goods and services becomes widespread.

Added: Apr 12, 2019
Article
Шабанова М. А. Общественные науки и современность. 2014. № 5. С. 14-26.

The author attempts to summarize T. Zaslavskaya contribution to the research of the post-communist transformation processes. Main attention is paid to the category of ”social mechanism of the transformation process”, its main features and cognitive capabilities, as well as to the basic building blocks and communication original action-structural concept of the social mechanism of the transformation process. It is shown that the concept of Tatiana Zaslavskaya, being tied to the explana¬tion of the laws of real social change, equips future researchers effective and relevant theoretical and methodological tools for further research searches.

Added: Dec 24, 2014
Article
Шкаратан О. И. Общественные науки и современность. 2011. № 1. С. 5-24.

The article critically regards the evolution of approaches towards social mobility problem starting. The major focus in the context of transition towards post-industrial societies (or, in other terms, informational or network societies) is devoted to the meritocratic principle of social selection, i.e. where talented and well-educated people gain better advantages for social advancements.

Added: Sep 12, 2012
Article
Васильев Л. С. Общественные науки и современность. 2012. № 4. С. 150-161.

The author argues on expediency and mutual conditionality of evolutionary changes in the nature and in society. In the article three major factors of the evolution are allocated, namely: the accident, the factor of coincidence of circumstances and the factor of acceleration of social evolution.

Added: Nov 14, 2012
Article
Оболонский А. В. Общественные науки и современность. 2017. № 6. С. 77-82.
Added: Dec 1, 2017
Article
Краснов М. А. Общественные науки и современность. 2006. № 3.
Added: Oct 2, 2010
Article
Асатурян Д. М., Косалс Л. Я. Общественные науки и современность. 2019. № 6. С. 5-26.

Based on a representative survey of 300 manufacturing enterprises, as well as on the dataset collected by the authors and containing information on the status and main economic indicators of the analyzed companies, the paper discusses the influence of organizational social capital on the survival of Russian industrial enterprises during the economic crisis. Three indicators here measured the organizational social capital, i.e. relations between managers and employees: trust, the degree of formality of relations, and cooperation between managers and employees. The paper concludes that only the level of cooperation between managers and employees measured by the responses of workers positively influenced the chances of survival of an industrial enterprise during a crisis, while the trust and the level of formality of relations turned out to be insignificant in a Russian setting.

Added: Nov 6, 2019
Article
Заостровцев А.П. Общественные науки и современность. 2019. № 4. С. 99-108.

The article analyzes the content of the book by the professor A. Skorobogatov “Society as a Contract between the Strong and Weak. Essays on Economics of History”. The author of the book set the task to apply the economic method to the study of history, to look at it on the basis of the assumption of rationality of actors and, based on it, to show history as a change in the forms of interaction of strong and weak participants. The article notes that the author succeeded in many things: systematizing the hierarchies of institutions, highlighting the special role of culture, the concept of conventional expectations as an explanation of the stability of dictatorial regimes. The book correctly noted that economic activity ceases to be the lot of the weak when the economy begins to determine military power. Then there are state guarantees of property rights and force is subject to the rules. At the same time, the article has controversy with the author of the book on a number of questions. The definition of the rationality in the book is so trivial (the choice of the best means achieving the goal) that it describes any human activity. According to the author of the article, there is an excessive propensity to geographical determinism in the book. The theory of young and old dictatorships and especially its application to the history of Soviet Russia causes great doubts. A rather primitive “economism” is used in determining the optimal size of the states. However, controversy with the author does not mean at all that the book does not satisfy the interest in problems posed in. On the contrary, this book will certainly become the starting point for all subsequent works in the field of the economics of history because of its conceptual depth and new vision of many aspects of historical process.

Added: Sep 24, 2019
Article
Васильев Л. С. Общественные науки и современность. 2008. № 5. С. 152-162.
Added: Sep 22, 2012
Article
Тихонова Н. Е. Общественные науки и современность. 2012. № 2. С. 38-52.

Considering specifi city of modernization processes in Russia, caused both by internal problems and Russias place in global economy, the author brings an attention to the question of features of standard-values system of Russian reformers. Results of the analysis of 12 values-blocks forming a basis of the variety of the standard-valuable systems of Russians are given.

Added: Aug 21, 2012
Article
Тихонова Н. Е. Общественные науки и современность. 2012. № 2. С. 38-52.

Considering specifi city of modernization processes in Russia, caused both by internal problems and Russias place in global economy, the author brings an attention to the question of features of standard-values system of Russian reformers. Results of the analysis of 12 values-blocks forming a basis of the variety of the standard-valuable systems of Russians are given.

Added: Dec 13, 2012
Article
Тихонова Н. Е. Общественные науки и современность. 2012. № 3. С. 5-21.

The author continues a theme begun in previous issue (see N. Tikhonovas article in Social Sciences Today, 2012, № 2). Feature of is standard-valuable system of the Russian society is shown. Actors of steady blocks of norms and values from consecutive traditionalists to nemodernists, the Russian modernists and postmodernists are discussed. Valuable preferences of two last groups are analyzed in detail; the specifi city essentially distinguishing them from the western modernists is shown.

Added: Dec 13, 2012
Article
Тихонова Н. Е. Общественные науки и современность. 2010. № 5. С. 31-44.
Added: Oct 1, 2012
Article
Паин Э. А. Общественные науки и современность. 2009. № 6. С. 37-54.
Added: Feb 1, 2010
Article
Сидорина Т. Ю. Общественные науки и современность. 2014. № 3. С. 140-150.
Added: Dec 5, 2014