• A
  • A
  • A
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • АБB
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Обычная версия сайта
Найдено 3 018 публикаций
Сортировка:
по названию
по году
Статья
Zhmud L., Kouprianov A. V. Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences. 2018. Vol. 109. No. 3. P. 445-472.
Добавлено: 20 сентября 2018
Статья
Vinogradov A. Apocrypha. 2011. Vol. 22. P. 105-114.

Апостол Андрей, о котором Новый Завет сообщает довольно скупо, предстает в Acta Andreae (2 пол. II в.) как проповедник энкратизма, однако в византийскую эпоху акты были переработаны посредством удаления «ереси», но послужили утверждению культа апостола в Патрах на Пелопоннесе. Кроме того, сообщение о переправе Андрея через Босфор было истолковано впоследствии как основание Константинопольской кафедры и дополнено столичными легендами. Помимо этого, Андрей становится героем совместных апокрифических деяний с другими апостолами, имеющих фантастический характер, прежде всего, «Деяний Андрея и Матфия» (нач. IV в.), действие которых с VI в. стало локализоваться на южном берегу Черного моря. Отдельные сведения из всех этих источников стали обобщаться с VI в. в т.н. апостольских списках, а они, в свою очередь, повлияли на Епифания Монаха, написавшего в 815–843 гг. «Житие Андрея» — текст уникального жанра для традиции произведений об апостолах. Это житие, где деятельность апостола разворачивается на территории Византийской империи в границах IX в., породило ряд переработок в IX–XI вв. (Никиты Пафлагона, Симеона Метафраста и др.), а также повлияло на формирование предания о проповеди Андрея у грузин и русских — так Андрей превратился из проповедника энкратизма в апостола Византии и ее мира.

Добавлено: 23 октября 2012
Статья
Kovalova A. Osteuropa. 2016. No. 8-10. P. 467-486.
Добавлено: 17 октября 2016
Статья
Stepanov B., Natalia Samutina. Urban history. 2018. Vol. 45. No. 1. P. 74-99.

The article discusses the dramatic history of the Tsaritsyno Park and museum-reserve. By the mid-2000s, it had become one of Moscow's iconic places and a zone where urban public culture was shaped. The authors trace the history of this architectural ensemble and park in terms of their role in сity culture and analyse changes in the historical culture of contemporary post-Soviet Moscow. The Tsaritsyno Park and museum exemplify these changes. An unfinished country residence of Catherine II, with a Grand Palace that had stood as a ruin for over 200 years, it has been radically renewed by the Moscow city authorities in what came to be labelled ‘fantasy restoration’. The palace was finished and now serves as the core of the museum, organized according to a controversial historical policy. Tsaritsyno as a whole became a cultural oddity featuring historical attractions for the public, effectively an ‘eighteenth-century theme park’.

Добавлено: 23 октября 2016
Статья
Ivantchik A. Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia. 2017. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 189-209.
Добавлено: 21 февраля 2019
Статья
Dragoş Gh. Năstăsoiu. The Hungarian Historical Review. Acta Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae – New Series. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 587-617.
Добавлено: 30 октября 2018
Статья
Fedyukin I. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 2010. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 741-762.
Добавлено: 1 апреля 2014
Статья
Seleznyov N. Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies. 2010. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 108-117.
Добавлено: 7 октября 2017
Статья
Bondarenko D. M., Grätz T., Skalník P. Social Evolution & History. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 5-16.
Добавлено: 7 октября 2014
Статья
Rogozhina A. A. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii. 2017. Vol. 2. No. 77. P. 356-376.
Добавлено: 11 марта 2017
Статья
Kalinin I. Osteuropa. 2017. Vol. 67. No. 6-8. P. 7-17.

Russlands Führung steht im Jahr 2017 vor einer Herausforderung: Sie muss Erinnerung an die Oktoberrevolution in ein Geschichtsbild verpacken, das Revolutionen als solche ablehnt. Ihre zentrale Botschaft lautet: Versöhnung. Doch es geht nicht um den Bürgerkrieg 1917–1920. Die Vergangenheit ist nur vorgeschoben. Es geht darum, jede Form von Kritik am heutigen Regime als Bedrohung des gesellschaftlichen Friedens zu diffamieren und mit dem Stigma zerstörerischer revolutionärer Tätigkeit zu belegen. Die Oktoberrevolution soll vergessen werden, an ihre Stelle ein nationalpatriotisches Gedenken an jene Ordnung durchgesetzt werden, die im Oktober 1917 gestürzt wurde.

Добавлено: 31 января 2018
Статья
Bobrovnikov V. Insight Turkey. 2018. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 249-270.
Добавлено: 10 февраля 2019
Статья
Elena Cirkovic. Law and Critique. 2016. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 23-44.

This paper addresses the processes by which the international community intervened and participated in the defining of Bosnian identity and the corresponding constitutional framework, as well as the continuous paradoxical tension between the ethnic local and claims to universalism of supranational legal norms. In particular, the 1995 Constitution and the architecture of its sovereignty have been contested through provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights. The analysis is further supported by the discussion of the architectonic structure of the Town Hall/National Library in Sarajevo that has had an important constitutional role since the collapse of the Ottoman period. The paper thus focuses on two sites for construction/deconstruction of Bosnian sovereignty: the constitutional framework and the more concretely visible architectural symbol of the Town Hall/National Library. This importance of a visual and spatial approach to Bosnian realities is carried further by the 1993 ‘Eulogy’ that Jean-Luc Nancy wrote for Sarajevo, as a site of the Mêlée.

Добавлено: 21 октября 2017
Статья
Fedotova A. A., Kouprianov A. V. Евразиатский энтомологический журнал. 2016. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 321-327.

Ранее публиковавшиеся биографические очерки о создателе теории фаз саранчи сэре Борисе Уварове, сэре Борисе Уварове, рыцаре-командоре ордена св. Михаила и св. Георгия и члене Лондонского королевского общества (1886 [sic] — 1970) были основаны главным образом на личных воспоминаниях его друзей и коллег, записанных в 1970 году или позднее. Архивные исследования обнаруживают подлинную дату его рождения и позволяют уточнить некоторые другие важные факты и даты его ранней биографии.

Добавлено: 5 сентября 2016
Статья
Penskaja E. ENTHYMEMA. 2015. No. 13. P. 167-183.
Добавлено: 6 марта 2016
Статья
Piskunova N. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 128-140.
Добавлено: 17 октября 2014
Статья
Grinin L. E., Korotayev A., A. V. M. Social Evolution & History. 2009. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 6-50.

The comparison between biological and social macroevolution is a very important (though insufficiently studied) subject whose analysis renders new significant possibilities to comprehend the processes, trends, mechanisms, and peculiarities of each of the two types of macroevolution. Of course, there are a few rather important (and very understandable) differences between them; however, it appears possible to identify a number of fundamental similarities. One may single out at least three fundamental sets of factors determining those similarities. First of all, those similarities stem from the fact that in both cases we are dealing with very complex non-equilibrium (but rather stable) systems whose principles of functioning and evolution are described by the General Systems' Theory, as well as by a number of cybernetic principles and laws.

Secondly, in both cases we do not deal with isolated systems; in both cases we deal with a complex interaction between systems of organic systems and external environment, whereas the reaction of systems to external challenges can be described in terms of certain general principles (that, however, express themselves rather differently within the biological reality, on the one hand, and within the social reality, on the other).

Thirdly, it is necessary to mention a direct ‘genetic’ link between the two types of macroevolution and their mutual influence.

It is important to emphasize that the very similarity of the principles and regularities of the two types of macroevolution does not imply their identity. Rather significant similarities are frequently accompanied by enormous differences. For example, genomes of the chimpanzees and the humans are very similar – with differences constituting just a few per cent; however, there are enormous differences with respect to intellectual and social differences of the chimpanzees and the humans hidden behind the apparently ‘insignificant’ difference between the two genomes.

Thus, in certain respects it appears reasonable to consider the biological and social macroevolution as a single macroevolutionary process. This implies the necessity to comprehend the general laws and regularities that describe this process, though their manifestations may display significant variations depending on properties of a concrete evolving entity (biological, or social one). An important notion that may contribute to the improvement of the operationalization level as regards the comparison between the two types of macroevolution is the one that we suggested some time ago – the social aromorphosis (that was developed as a counterpart to the notion of biological aromorphosis well established within Russian evolutionary biology). We regard social aromorphosis as a rare qualitative macrochange that increases in a very significant way complexity, adaptability, and mutual influence of the social systems, that opens new possibilities for social macrodevelopment. In our paper we discuss a number of regularities that describe biological and social macroevolution and that employ the notions of social and biological aromorphosis such as ones of the module evolution (or the evolutionary ‘block assemblage’), ‘payment for arogenic progress’ etc.

Добавлено: 15 октября 2014
Статья
Viola L. A., Barenberg A., Goldman W. Z. et al. Canadian Slavonic Papers. 2019. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 225-243.

ince 2015, our journal’s publisher, Taylor & Francis, has sponsored the Canadian Association of Slavists’ Taylor & Francis Book Prize. It is awarded annually for the best academic book in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies published in the previous calendar year by a Canadian author (citizen or permanent resident). The winner of the 2018 prize, to be awarded at the annual conference of the Canadian Association of Slavists at the University of British Columbia in June, is Lynne Viola of the University of Toronto for her book, Stalinist Perpetrators on Trial: Scenes from the Great Terror in Soviet Ukraine (Oxford University Press, 2017). To mark Professor Viola’s achievement and to further the discussion of her important work, Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue canadienne des slavistes invited three international scholars who work in related fields of Soviet history to comment on the book. Following interventions from Alan Barenberg, Wendy Z. Goldman, and Tanja Penter, Professor Viola offers a response.

Добавлено: 13 июня 2019
Статья
Lukin A. Asia Policy. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 19-25.
Добавлено: 22 июля 2018
Статья
Afanasyev A. A. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política. 2016. Vol. XIII. No. 2. P. 429-456.

Neste ensaio histórico investigamos as origens da Teoria Quantitativa do Dinheiro (Moeda) em Portugal do meio do Século dʼOuro. Temos encontrado as fontes desta teoria na primeira suma portuguesa da teologia moral Manual de Confessores e Penitentes que foi composto pelo franciscano português frade Rodrigo do Porto e foi impressa na Universidade de Coimbra em 1549. Também temos encontrado a inspiração de frei Rodrigo do Porto para a formação do pensamento econômico (das teorias do preço justo e da teoria quantitativa) do grande pensador espanhol e verdadeiro descobridor da Teoria Quantitativa do Dinheiro doutor Martinho de Azpilcueta Navarro.

Добавлено: 31 декабря 2016
Статья
Kochetkova E. Scandinavian Journal of History. 2018. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 212-232.
Добавлено: 16 октября 2015